Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 4/2006

01-10-2006 | Original Paper

Nativity and Cardiovascular Disease Screening Practices

Author: Janine M. Jurkowski

Published in: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading causes of death among Mexican American adults living in the United States. Using data from a modified Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey and guided by the Anderson Model, this study examined the effect of nativity on CVD screening practices among 423 Mexican American adults living in Chicago. Dependent variables included having had a blood pressure and cholesterol screening and a routine check up in the past 2 years. Multivariate analyses were used to control for sociodemographic factors, while accounting for complex sampling design. Compared to those born in Mexico, US-born Mexican Americans had significantly greater odds of obtaining blood pressure (OR=5.61), and cholesterol screenings (OR=1.60) and having a routine checkup (OR=2.69) in the past 2 years. Health professionals with an agenda to increase screenings for CVD risk factors among Mexican Americans living in northern cities should understand the impact of nativity on screening practices.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Update—2003 Update. Dallas (TX); 2002 American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Update—2003 Update. Dallas (TX); 2002
2.
go back to reference Kaiser Permanente. A Provider's Handbook on Culturally Competent care: Latino Population. Oakland, CA: Kaiser Permanente National Diversity Council; 2001 Kaiser Permanente. A Provider's Handbook on Culturally Competent care: Latino Population. Oakland, CA: Kaiser Permanente National Diversity Council; 2001
3.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress in chronic disease prevention treatment and perceived blood pressure control among self-reported hypertensives—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1986. MMWR 1987; 36(17):260–267 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress in chronic disease prevention treatment and perceived blood pressure control among self-reported hypertensives—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1986. MMWR 1987; 36(17):260–267
4.
go back to reference Jurkowski JM: Cardiovascular disease behaviors among Latinas, non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white women. Dissertation Abstracts International 2003; DAI-B 64/03:1206 Jurkowski JM: Cardiovascular disease behaviors among Latinas, non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white women. Dissertation Abstracts International 2003; DAI-B 64/03:1206
5.
go back to reference Diaz VA: Cultural factors in preventive care: Latinos. Prim Care Clin Off Pract 2002; 29:495–502CrossRef Diaz VA: Cultural factors in preventive care: Latinos. Prim Care Clin Off Pract 2002; 29:495–502CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Scott, LW, et al. U.S. Minority Health A Chartbook. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1999 Scott, LW, et al. U.S. Minority Health A Chartbook. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1999
7.
go back to reference DeLaet DE, et al. Receipt of preventive services among privately insured minorities in managed care versus fee-for-service insurance plans. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17(6):451–457CrossRefPubMed DeLaet DE, et al. Receipt of preventive services among privately insured minorities in managed care versus fee-for-service insurance plans. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17(6):451–457CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Guendelman S, Wagner TH: Health services utilization among Latinos and White-non-Latinos. Results from a national survey. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2000; 11:179–194PubMed Guendelman S, Wagner TH: Health services utilization among Latinos and White-non-Latinos. Results from a national survey. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2000; 11:179–194PubMed
9.
go back to reference Borrayo EA, Guarnaccia CA: Differences in Mexican-born and US-born women of Mexican Decent regarding factors related to breast cancer screening behaviors. Health Care Women Int 2000; 21:599–613CrossRefPubMed Borrayo EA, Guarnaccia CA: Differences in Mexican-born and US-born women of Mexican Decent regarding factors related to breast cancer screening behaviors. Health Care Women Int 2000; 21:599–613CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jurkowski JM, Johnson TP: Acculturation and cardiovascular disease screening practices among Mexican Americans living in Chicago. Ethn Dis 2005; 15(3) Jurkowski JM, Johnson TP: Acculturation and cardiovascular disease screening practices among Mexican Americans living in Chicago. Ethn Dis 2005; 15(3)
11.
go back to reference de la Torre A, et al. The health insurance status of US Latino women: A profile from the 1982–1984 HHANES. Am J Public Health 1996; 86:533–537PubMed de la Torre A, et al. The health insurance status of US Latino women: A profile from the 1982–1984 HHANES. Am J Public Health 1996; 86:533–537PubMed
12.
go back to reference Collins KS, et al. Health Concerns Across A Woman's Lifespan: The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Women's Health. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1999 Collins KS, et al. Health Concerns Across A Woman's Lifespan: The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Women's Health. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1999
13.
go back to reference Chicago Fact Book. Chicago: City of Chicago Department of Commerce; 2000 Chicago Fact Book. Chicago: City of Chicago Department of Commerce; 2000
14.
go back to reference United States Bureau of the Census. Profiles of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Washington DC: United States Department of Commerce; 2001 United States Bureau of the Census. Profiles of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Washington DC: United States Department of Commerce; 2001
15.
go back to reference Brick JM, et al. Bias in list-assisted telephone samples. Public Opin Q 1995; 59:218–223CrossRef Brick JM, et al. Bias in list-assisted telephone samples. Public Opin Q 1995; 59:218–223CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Trodahl V, Carter R Random selection of respondents within households. J Mark Res 1964; 1:71–76CrossRef Trodahl V, Carter R Random selection of respondents within households. J Mark Res 1964; 1:71–76CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bryant BE Respondent selection in a time of changing household composition. J Mark Res 1975; 12:129–135CrossRef Bryant BE Respondent selection in a time of changing household composition. J Mark Res 1975; 12:129–135CrossRef
18.
go back to reference American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2000 American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2000
19.
go back to reference Survey Research Laboratory. Report on Health Behaviors in Greater Lawn. Report No. 842. Chicago: Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2000 Survey Research Laboratory. Report on Health Behaviors in Greater Lawn. Report No. 842. Chicago: Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2000
20.
go back to reference Survey Research Laboratory. Report on Health Behaviors in Lawndale. Report No. 849. Chicago: Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2000 Survey Research Laboratory. Report on Health Behaviors in Lawndale. Report No. 849. Chicago: Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2000
21.
go back to reference Keeter S, Miller C, Kohut A: Consequences of reducing non-response in a national telephone survey. Public Opin Q 2000; 64:125–148CrossRefPubMed Keeter S, Miller C, Kohut A: Consequences of reducing non-response in a national telephone survey. Public Opin Q 2000; 64:125–148CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Groves RM, Couper MP: Non-Response in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley Publishers; 1998 Groves RM, Couper MP: Non-Response in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley Publishers; 1998
23.
go back to reference Pearson TA, et al. AHA prevention conference III: Behavior change and compliance: Keys to improving cardiovascular health, January 15–17, 1993, Monterrey, California: Lipids: Workshop IV. Circulation 1993; 88:1397–1401PubMed Pearson TA, et al. AHA prevention conference III: Behavior change and compliance: Keys to improving cardiovascular health, January 15–17, 1993, Monterrey, California: Lipids: Workshop IV. Circulation 1993; 88:1397–1401PubMed
24.
go back to reference Andersen RM: Revisiting the behavioral model and access to care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995; 36:1–10PubMedCrossRef Andersen RM: Revisiting the behavioral model and access to care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995; 36:1–10PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Long JS: Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997 Long JS: Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997
26.
go back to reference Wright RE: Logistic Regression. In Grimm LG, Yarnold PR, eds. Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 217–244). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000 Wright RE: Logistic Regression. In Grimm LG, Yarnold PR, eds. Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 217–244). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000
27.
go back to reference Hamilton LC: Statistics with STATA. Updated for Version 7. Belmont, CACA: Duxbury; 2003 Hamilton LC: Statistics with STATA. Updated for Version 7. Belmont, CACA: Duxbury; 2003
28.
go back to reference Public Health Action Plan to Prevent Heart Disease and Stroke. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. http://www.cdc.gov/cvh/Action_Plan/full_appendix_c.htm Date of last review: December 01, 2004. Viewed: May 31, 2005 Public Health Action Plan to Prevent Heart Disease and Stroke. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. http://​www.​cdc.​gov/​cvh/​Action_​Plan/​full_​appendix_​c.​htm Date of last review: December 01, 2004. Viewed: May 31, 2005
29.
go back to reference MMWR: State-specific cholesterol screening trends–United States, 1991–1999.. 2000; 49(33):750–5 MMWR: State-specific cholesterol screening trends–United States, 1991–1999.. 2000; 49(33):750–5
30.
go back to reference MMWR: State-specific trends in self-reported blood pressure screening and high blood pressure—United States, 1991–1999. 2002; 51(21):456–460 MMWR: State-specific trends in self-reported blood pressure screening and high blood pressure—United States, 1991–1999. 2002; 51(21):456–460
31.
go back to reference Illinois Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS): http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/display.asp?cat=CA&yr=1999&qkey=2728&state=IL Illinois Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS): http://​apps.​nccd.​cdc.​gov/​brfss/​display.​asp?​cat=​CA&​yr=​1999&​qkey=​2728&​state=​IL
32.
go back to reference Bertakis KD, et al. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract 2000; 49(2):147–52PubMed Bertakis KD, et al. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract 2000; 49(2):147–52PubMed
33.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2. US Department of Health and Human Services; 1992 National Center for Health Statistics. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2. US Department of Health and Human Services; 1992
34.
go back to reference Waksberg J, et al. Assessment of Major Federal Data Sets for Analyses of Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander Subgroups and Native Americans, Extending the Utility of Federal Data Bases. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services; 2000 Waksberg J, et al. Assessment of Major Federal Data Sets for Analyses of Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander Subgroups and Native Americans, Extending the Utility of Federal Data Bases. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services; 2000
35.
go back to reference Guzman B: The Hispanic Population: Census 2000 Brief. 2001. U.S. Census Bureau.Report number: C2kBR/01–3 Guzman B: The Hispanic Population: Census 2000 Brief. 2001. U.S. Census Bureau.Report number: C2kBR/01–3
36.
go back to reference Casper ML, et al. Women and Heart Disease: An Atlas of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortality (2nd ed.). Morgantown WV: Office for Social Environment and Health Research; 2000 Casper ML, et al. Women and Heart Disease: An Atlas of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortality (2nd ed.). Morgantown WV: Office for Social Environment and Health Research; 2000
37.
go back to reference Garbers S, et al. Barriers to breast cancer screening for low income Mexican and Dominican women in New York City. J Urban Health 2003; 80(1):81–91PubMed Garbers S, et al. Barriers to breast cancer screening for low income Mexican and Dominican women in New York City. J Urban Health 2003; 80(1):81–91PubMed
38.
go back to reference Chavez LR, et al.Understanding knowledge and attitudes about breast cancer: A cultural analysis. Arch Fam Med 1995; 4:145–152CrossRefPubMed Chavez LR, et al.Understanding knowledge and attitudes about breast cancer: A cultural analysis. Arch Fam Med 1995; 4:145–152CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Barnett E, et al. Men and Heart Disease: An Atlas of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortality. First Edition. Morgantown WV: Office for Social Environment and Health Research; 2001 Barnett E, et al. Men and Heart Disease: An Atlas of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortality. First Edition. Morgantown WV: Office for Social Environment and Health Research; 2001
40.
go back to reference Jackson C, et al. The behavioral risk factor survey and the stanford five-city project survey: A comparison of cardiovascular risk behavior estimates. Am J Public Health 1992; 82:412–416PubMedCrossRef Jackson C, et al. The behavioral risk factor survey and the stanford five-city project survey: A comparison of cardiovascular risk behavior estimates. Am J Public Health 1992; 82:412–416PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bowlin SJ, et al. Reliability and changes in validity of self-reported cardiovascular disease risk factors using dual response: The behavioral risk factor surveillance system. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49:511–517CrossRefPubMed Bowlin SJ, et al. Reliability and changes in validity of self-reported cardiovascular disease risk factors using dual response: The behavioral risk factor surveillance system. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49:511–517CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Shea S, et al. Reliability of the behavioral risk factor survey in a triethnic population. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133:489–500PubMed Shea S, et al. Reliability of the behavioral risk factor survey in a triethnic population. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133:489–500PubMed
Metadata
Title
Nativity and Cardiovascular Disease Screening Practices
Author
Janine M. Jurkowski
Publication date
01-10-2006
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 1557-1912
Electronic ISSN: 1557-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-006-9004-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 4/2006 Go to the issue