Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Rhinology

Nasal septal packing: which one?

Authors: Engin Acıoğlu, Deniz Tuna Edizer, Özgür Yiğit, Fırat Onur, Zeynep Alkan

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of four different types of nasal packs on pain, nasal fullness and postoperative bleeding following septoplasty. Prospective randomised double blind study was conducted. The study group included 119 patients who underwent endonasal septoplasty under general anaesthesia. Four types of nasal packing materials were utilized: (1) Merocel standard 8-cm nasal dressing without airway, (2) Doyle Combo splint (DCS), (3) Merocel in a glove finger and (4) Vaseline gauze. All packs were removed at the 48th hour (±3 h) after the surgery. Three different variables were investigated following the surgical procedure: (1) pain, (2) nasal fullness and (3) bleeding after removal of the nasal packing material. DCS produced the greatest pain at the first and sixth postoperative hours. At the first postoperative day, the greatest pain score was reported for Merocel in the glove finger and the least for Merocel. The pain scores during the removal of the nasal packings were highest for Merocel and lowest for Merocel in the glove finger. DCS had the lowest nasal fullness score. Bleeding ratio was highest for Merocel, followed by Vaseline gauze, DCS and Merocel in the glove finger. Many different commercially available packing materials are presently used, each with inherent advantages and disadvantages. We evaluated the pain, nasal fullness and bleeding potential of four nasal packing materials and determined that Merocel had the highest pain potential during removal and the highest rate of bleeding following removal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1022–1024PubMedCrossRef Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1022–1024PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ozcan C, Vayisoglu Y, Kiliç S et al (2008) Comparison of rapid rhino and Merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37:826–831PubMed Ozcan C, Vayisoglu Y, Kiliç S et al (2008) Comparison of rapid rhino and Merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37:826–831PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bresnihan M, Mehigan B, Curran A (2007) An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Clin Otolaryngol 32:352–355PubMedCrossRef Bresnihan M, Mehigan B, Curran A (2007) An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Clin Otolaryngol 32:352–355PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Orlandi RR, Lanza DC (2004) Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope 114:1541–1544PubMedCrossRef Orlandi RR, Lanza DC (2004) Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope 114:1541–1544PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kula M, Yuce I, Unlu Y et al (2010) Effect of nasal packing and haemostatic septal suture on mucociliary activity after septoplasty: an assessment by rhinoscintigraphy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:541–546PubMedCrossRef Kula M, Yuce I, Unlu Y et al (2010) Effect of nasal packing and haemostatic septal suture on mucociliary activity after septoplasty: an assessment by rhinoscintigraphy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:541–546PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shaw CL, Dymock RB, Cowin A et al (2000) Effect of packing on nasal mucosa of sheep. J Laryngol Otol 114:506–509PubMed Shaw CL, Dymock RB, Cowin A et al (2000) Effect of packing on nasal mucosa of sheep. J Laryngol Otol 114:506–509PubMed
7.
go back to reference Yilmazer C, Sener M, Yilmaz I et al (2007) Pre-emptive analgesia for removal of nasal packing: a double-blind placebo controlled study. Auris Nasus Larynx 34:471–475PubMedCrossRef Yilmazer C, Sener M, Yilmaz I et al (2007) Pre-emptive analgesia for removal of nasal packing: a double-blind placebo controlled study. Auris Nasus Larynx 34:471–475PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cruise AS, Amonoo-Kuofi K, Srouji I et al (2006) A randomized trial of Rapid Rhino Riemann and Telfa nasal packs following endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 31:25–32PubMedCrossRef Cruise AS, Amonoo-Kuofi K, Srouji I et al (2006) A randomized trial of Rapid Rhino Riemann and Telfa nasal packs following endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 31:25–32PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nunez DA, Martin FW (1991) An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 16:549–550PubMedCrossRef Nunez DA, Martin FW (1991) An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 16:549–550PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F et al (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22:306–320PubMedCrossRef Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F et al (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22:306–320PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Moumoulidis I, Draper MR, Patel H et al (2006) A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:719–722PubMedCrossRef Moumoulidis I, Draper MR, Patel H et al (2006) A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:719–722PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Arya AK, Butt O, Nigam A (2003) Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery. Rhinology 41:241–243PubMed Arya AK, Butt O, Nigam A (2003) Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery. Rhinology 41:241–243PubMed
14.
go back to reference Dubin MR, Pletcher SD (2009) Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:279–285PubMedCrossRef Dubin MR, Pletcher SD (2009) Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:279–285PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hajiioannou JK, Bizaki A, Fragiadakis G et al (2007) Optimal time for nasal packing removal after septoplasty. A comparative study. Rhinology 45:68–71PubMed Hajiioannou JK, Bizaki A, Fragiadakis G et al (2007) Optimal time for nasal packing removal after septoplasty. A comparative study. Rhinology 45:68–71PubMed
Metadata
Title
Nasal septal packing: which one?
Authors
Engin Acıoğlu
Deniz Tuna Edizer
Özgür Yiğit
Fırat Onur
Zeynep Alkan
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1842-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2012 Go to the issue