Top

European Spine Journal

Published in:

01-07-2016 | Original Article

Narrow cervical canal in 1211 asymptomatic healthy subjects: the relationship with spinal cord compression on MRI

Authors: Hiroaki Nakashima, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Kota Suda, Masatsune Yamagata, Takayoshi Ueta, Fumihiko Kato

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2016

Abstract

Purpose

Narrow cervical canal (NCC) has been a suspected risk factor for later development of cervical myelopathy. However, few studies have evaluated the prevalence in asymptomatic subjects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of NCC in a large cohort of asymptomatic volunteers.

Methods

This study was a cross-sectional study of 1211 asymptomatic volunteers. Approximately 100 men and 100 women representing each decade of life from the 20s to the 70s were included in this study. Cervical canal anteroposterior diameters at C5 midvertebral level on X-rays, and the prevalence of spinal cord compression (SCC) and increased signal intensity (ISI) changes on MRI were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the cut-off value of the severity of canal stenosis resulting in SCC.

Results

NCC (<14 mm) was observed in 123 (10.2 %) subjects. SCC and ISI were found in 64 (5.3 %) and 28 (2.3 %) subjects, respectively. The prevalence of NCC was significantly higher in females and older subjects, but the occurrence of severe NCC (<12 mm) did not increase with age. The canal size in subjects with SCC or ISI was significantly smaller than in those without SCC (p < 0.0001). The cut-off values of cervical canal stenosis resulting in SCC were 14.8 and 13.9 mm in males and females, respectively.

Conclusions

The prevalence of NCC was considerably lower among asymptomatic healthy volunteers; the cervical canal diameter in subjects with SCC or ISI was significantly smaller than in asymptomatic subjects; NCC is a risk factor for SCC.

Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG (2013) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 19:409–421CrossRefPubMed

Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG (2015) Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000913

Baptiste DC, Fehlings MG (2006) Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 6:190s–197s. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.024 CrossRef

Karadimas SK, Erwin WM, Ely CG, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG (2013) The pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 38(22 Suppl 1):S21–S36CrossRefPubMed

Kasai Y, Akeda K, Uchida A (2007) Physical characteristics of patients with developmental cervical spinal canal stenosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 16:901–903. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0358-2 CrossRef

Hayashi H, Okada K, Hamada M, Tada K, Ueno R (1987) Etiologic factors of myelopathy. A radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res (214):200–209

Inoue H, Ohmori K, Takatsu T, Teramoto T, Ishida Y, Suzuki K (1996) Morphological analysis of the cervical spinal canal, dural tube and spinal cord in normal individuals using CT myelography. Neuroradiology 38:148–151CrossRefPubMed

Sasaki T, Kadoya S, Iizuka H (1998) Roentgenological study of the sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in normal adult Japanese. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 38:83–88 discussion 88–89 CrossRef

Edwards WC, LaROCCA H (1983) The developmental segmental sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine 8:20–27CrossRefPubMed

10.

Torg JS, Naranja RJ Jr, Pavlov H, Galinat BJ, Warren R, Stine RA (1996) The relationship of developmental narrowing of the cervical spinal canal to reversible and irreversible injury of the cervical spinal cord in football players. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78:1308–1314

11.

Gore DR (2001) Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a 10-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2463–2466CrossRef

12.

Morishita Y, Naito M, Hymanson H, Miyazaki M, Wu G, Wang JC (2009) The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 18:877–883. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0968-y CrossRef

13.

Shigematsu H, Ueda Y, Koizumi M, Takeshima T, Tanaka Y, Satoh N, Matsumori H, Oshima T, Matsuyama E, Kugai A, Takakura Y (2008) Does developmental canal stenosis influence surgical results of bilateral open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? J Neurosurg Spine 9:358–362. doi:10.3171/spi.2008.9.10.358 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Higo M (1987) Roentgenological study of anterior–posterior diameter in developmental canal stenosis of cervical spine. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 61:455–465PubMed

15.

Nagata K, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H, Muraki S, Ishimoto Y, Yamada H, Takiguchi N, Nakagawa Y, Minamide A, Oka H (2014) The prevalence of cervical myelopathy among subjects with narrow cervical spinal canal in a population-based magnetic resonance imaging study: the Wakayama Spine Study. Spine J 14:2811–2817CrossRefPubMed

16.

Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T (2012) Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: radiographic data from over 1200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 21:1492–1498. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2167-5 CrossRef

17.

Kato F, Yukawa Y, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T (2012) Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: magnetic resonance imaging of over 1200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 21:1499–1507. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2176-4 CrossRef

18.

Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T, Kato F (2015) Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of the cervical spines in 1211 asymptomatic subjects. Spine 40:392–398CrossRefPubMed

19.

Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M, Ito K (2007) MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine 32:1675–1678CrossRefPubMed

20.

Murone I (1974) The importance of the sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal canal in relation to spondylosis and myelopathy. J Bone Jt Surg Br 56:30–36

21.

Higo M, Sakou T, Suzuki Y, Matsumoto R, Ito H, Kosakura H (1984) Roentogenologicalstudyoftheantero-posteriordiameter in cervical developmental canal stenosis [in Japanese]. Rinsho Seikei Geka 19:361–366

22.

Goto S-I, Umehara J, Aizawa T, Kokubun S (2010) Comparison of cervical spinal canal diameter between younger and elder generations of Japanese. J Orthop Sci 15:97–103CrossRefPubMed

23.

Wolf BS, Khilnani M, Malis L (1956) The sagittal diameter of the bony cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis. J Mt Sinai Hosp N Y 23:283–292PubMed

Title: Narrow cervical canal in 1211 asymptomatic healthy subjects: the relationship with spinal cord compression on MRI
Authors: Hiroaki Nakashima
Yasutsugu Yukawa
Kota Suda
Masatsune Yamagata
Takayoshi Ueta
Fumihiko Kato
Publication date: 01-07-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4608-z

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Narrow cervical canal in 1211 asymptomatic healthy subjects: the relationship with spinal cord compression on MRI

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Morphological studies of cartilage endplates in subaxial cervical region

Heterotopic ossification and clinical outcome in nonconstrained cervical arthroplasty 2 years after surgery: the Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT)

Cervical cages placed bilaterally in the facet joints from a posterior approach significantly increase foraminal area

Abstracts for SFCR-August 2016

C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of cervical spine with anterior versus posterior types of procedures in patients with cervical myelopathy

Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “The surgical management of atlanto-axial subluxation in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis” (Khalid M. I. Salem et al. Eur Spine J; 2014, DOI 10.1007/s00586-014-3648-5)