Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2008

01-01-2008 | Melanomas

N-Ratio: a Novel Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Stage-III Cutaneous Melanoma

Authors: Carlo Riccardo Rossi, MD, Simone Mocellin, MD, PhD, Sandro Pasquali, MD, Pierluigi Pilati, MD, Donato Nitti, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the ratio between metastatic and excised lymph nodes (“N-ratio”) might have an independent prognostic value in patients with TNM stage-III cutaneous melanoma.

Methods

The clinical records of 213 melanoma patients who had undergone radical lymph node dissection (RLND) and were found to harbor pathology-proven metastatic disease were used for analysis. The following clinico-pathological variables were considered for the prognostic study: patient’s age and sex, primary tumor site, tumor thickness, Clark’s level, ulceration, absolute number of positive lymph nodes, total number of excised lymph nodes, TNM stage (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC), and N-ratio (N-ratio A, ≤10%; N-ratio B, 10–25%; N-ratio C, >25%).

Results

Patients were categorized into three N-ratio classes according to the percentage of metastatic lymph nodes (N-ratio A, n = 94; N-ratio B, n = 95; N-ratio C, n = 24). The mean follow-up was 40 months. At univariate survival analysis, tumor thickness (P < 0.0001), ulceration (P = 0.046), Clark’s level (P = 0.0002), number of positive lymph nodes (P < 0.0001), TNM stage (P < 0.0001), and N-ratio (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Interestingly, the Cox proportional hazard model showed that, along with tumor thickness (HR 1.069, = 0.008) and TNM stage (HR 1.696, = 0.015), N-ratio (HR 1.578, = 0.012) also independently predicted OS.

Conclusions

N-ratio is a novel easy-to-obtain independent prognostic factor for melanoma patients with lymph node metastases and might provide clinicians with additional information suitable for patient stratification while choosing adjuvant treatment. Validation of these results in larger prospective series is warranted to implement N-ratio in the routine clinical setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 16:3635–48 Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 16:3635–48
2.
go back to reference Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prognostic factors Analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System. J Clin Oncol 2001; 16:3622–34 Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prognostic factors Analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System. J Clin Oncol 2001; 16:3622–34
3.
go back to reference Balch CM, Soong SJ, Atkins MB, et al. An evidence staging system for cutaneous melanoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54:131–49PubMedCrossRef Balch CM, Soong SJ, Atkins MB, et al. An evidence staging system for cutaneous melanoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54:131–49PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 2005; 365:687–701PubMed Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 2005; 365:687–701PubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Verna S, Quirt I, McrCeady D, Bak K, Charette M, Iscoe N. Systematic review of systematic adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk of recurrent melanoma. Cancer 2006; 106:1431–2CrossRef Verna S, Quirt I, McrCeady D, Bak K, Charette M, Iscoe N. Systematic review of systematic adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk of recurrent melanoma. Cancer 2006; 106:1431–2CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kirkwood JM, Manola J, Ibrahim J, Sondak V, Ernstoff MS, Rao U. A pooled analysis of eastern cooperative oncology group and intergroup trials of adjuvant high-dose interferon for melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10:1670–7PubMedCrossRef Kirkwood JM, Manola J, Ibrahim J, Sondak V, Ernstoff MS, Rao U. A pooled analysis of eastern cooperative oncology group and intergroup trials of adjuvant high-dose interferon for melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10:1670–7PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lens MB, Dawes M. Interferon alfa therapy for malignant melanoma: a systemic review of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:1818–25PubMedCrossRef Lens MB, Dawes M. Interferon alfa therapy for malignant melanoma: a systemic review of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:1818–25PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wheatley K, Natalie I, Hancock B, Gore M, Eggermont Alexander, Suciu S. Does adjuvant interferon-α for high-risk melanoma provide worthwhile benefit? A meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2003; 29:241–52PubMedCrossRef Wheatley K, Natalie I, Hancock B, Gore M, Eggermont Alexander, Suciu S. Does adjuvant interferon-α for high-risk melanoma provide worthwhile benefit? A meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2003; 29:241–52PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gogas H, Ioannovich J, Dafni U, et al. Prognostic significance of autoimmunity during treatment of melanoma with interferon. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:709–718PubMedCrossRef Gogas H, Ioannovich J, Dafni U, et al. Prognostic significance of autoimmunity during treatment of melanoma with interferon. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:709–718PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, et al. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:1077–85PubMedCrossRef Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, et al. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:1077–85PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al. The ratio between metastatic and examined nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless the type of lymphadenectomy. Results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 2007; 245:543–52PubMedCrossRef Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al. The ratio between metastatic and examined nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless the type of lymphadenectomy. Results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 2007; 245:543–52PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:2910–6PubMedCrossRef Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:2910–6PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kuru B. Prognostic significance of total number of nodes removed, and ratio of positive nodes to removed nodes in positive breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:1082–8PubMedCrossRef Kuru B. Prognostic significance of total number of nodes removed, and ratio of positive nodes to removed nodes in positive breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:1082–8PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA, Hoffman JP. The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 2004; 70:235–40PubMed Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA, Hoffman JP. The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 2004; 70:235–40PubMed
16.
go back to reference Lehmann EL, Romano JP. Testing statistical hypotheses, Third Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005 Lehmann EL, Romano JP. Testing statistical hypotheses, Third Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005
17.
go back to reference Mocellin S, Provenzano M, Rossi CR, Pilati PL, Nitti D, Lise M. DNA Array-based gene profiling. From surgical specimen to the molecular portrait of cancer. Ann Surg 2005; 241:16–26PubMed Mocellin S, Provenzano M, Rossi CR, Pilati PL, Nitti D, Lise M. DNA Array-based gene profiling. From surgical specimen to the molecular portrait of cancer. Ann Surg 2005; 241:16–26PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bittner M, Meltzer P, Chen Y, et al. Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000; 406:536–40PubMedCrossRef Bittner M, Meltzer P, Chen Y, et al. Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000; 406:536–40PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lewis TB, Robinson JE, Bastien R. Molecular classification of melanoma using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Cancer 2005; 104:1678–86PubMedCrossRef Lewis TB, Robinson JE, Bastien R. Molecular classification of melanoma using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Cancer 2005; 104:1678–86PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cheon AD, Essner R, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Judging the therapeutic value of lymph node dissections for melanoma. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191:16–23CrossRef Cheon AD, Essner R, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Judging the therapeutic value of lymph node dissections for melanoma. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191:16–23CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Galliot-Repkat C, Cailliod R, Trost O, et al. The prognostic impact of the extent of lymph node dissection in patients with stage III melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:790–4PubMedCrossRef Galliot-Repkat C, Cailliod R, Trost O, et al. The prognostic impact of the extent of lymph node dissection in patients with stage III melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:790–4PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
N-Ratio: a Novel Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Stage-III Cutaneous Melanoma
Authors
Carlo Riccardo Rossi, MD
Simone Mocellin, MD, PhD
Sandro Pasquali, MD
Pierluigi Pilati, MD
Donato Nitti, MD
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9641-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2008 Go to the issue