Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Myopia information on TikTok: analysis factors that impact video quality and audience engagement

Authors: Shuai Ming, Jie Han, Xi Yao, Xiaohong Guo, Qingge Guo, Bo Lei

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

TikTok is emerging as a vital platform for health information dissemination. Despite myopia being a global public health issue, the high-quality myopia information shared by health educators often fails to go viral. It is imperative to analyze the factors influencing video quality and popularity, especially from diverse perspectives of researchers, health educators, and audiences.

Methods

TikTok myopia-related videos were retrieved using TikTok’s default comprehensive search (DCS) and most liked search (MLS) strategies. Venn diagrams were employed to illustrate the relationships and commonalities between the two strategies across four sample sizes (top 200, 150, 100, and 50). Video metadata, including details such as creator information, production properties, upload time, video duration, and viewer engagement, were collected. Video quality was assessed using the DISCERN tool. Video content covering six aspects of myopia were evaluated. The impact of search strategies, video sample sizes, production properties, and myopia content on video quality and audience engagement was analyzed through single-factor or multi-factor analysis.

Results

DCS and MLS retrieval strategies, as well as varying sample sizes, resulted in differences in audience engagement for myopia videos (P < 0.039), while The DISCERN quality scores remained comparable (P > 0.221). Videos published by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and non-profit organizations (NPOs) were associated with high-quality (P ≤ 0.014) but comparatively lower popularity (P < 0.033). Videos that reported contents of risk factors, management, and outcomes showed high popularity (P < 0.018), while longer video duration (> 60s) exhibited the opposite trend (P < 0.032). Content on myopia evaluation (P ≤ 0.001) and management (P ≤ 0.022) and video duration were positively correlated with higher DISCERN quality.

Conclusion

Videos created by HCPs and NPOs deserve greater attention. Rather than pursuing entertaining effects, professional educators should emphasize producing concise, and high-quality myopia content that readily resonates with the audience and has the potential to go viral on the platform.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bourne R, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(9):e888–97.PubMedCrossRef Bourne R, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(9):e888–97.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, et al. The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;62:134–49.PubMedCrossRef Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, et al. The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;62:134–49.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Flaxman SR, Bourne R, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e1221–34.PubMedCrossRef Flaxman SR, Bourne R, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e1221–34.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.PubMedCrossRef Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Xu T, Wang B, Liu H, et al. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in China from 1990 to 2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(12):e682–91.PubMedCrossRef Xu T, Wang B, Liu H, et al. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in China from 1990 to 2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(12):e682–91.PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Bhatt NR, Czarniecki SW, Borgmann H, et al. A Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Eur Urol Focus. 2021Sep;7(5):1195–204.PubMedCrossRef Bhatt NR, Czarniecki SW, Borgmann H, et al. A Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Eur Urol Focus. 2021Sep;7(5):1195–204.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ming S, Han J, Li M, Liu Y, Xie K, Lei B. TikTok and adolescent vision health: Content and information quality assessment of the top short videos related to myopia. Front Public Health. 2023;4(10):1068582.CrossRef Ming S, Han J, Li M, Liu Y, Xie K, Lei B. TikTok and adolescent vision health: Content and information quality assessment of the top short videos related to myopia. Front Public Health. 2023;4(10):1068582.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Unni Z, Weinstein E. Shelter in Place, Connect Online: Trending TikTok Content During the Early Days of the U.S. COVID-19 Pandemic. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(5):863–8.PubMedCrossRef Unni Z, Weinstein E. Shelter in Place, Connect Online: Trending TikTok Content During the Early Days of the U.S. COVID-19 Pandemic. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(5):863–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Jaime C. COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2020;34(5):367–9.PubMedCrossRef Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Jaime C. COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2020;34(5):367–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yang S, Zhan J, Xu X. Is TikTok a high-quality source of information on thyroid cancer? Endocrine. 2023;81(2):270–6.PubMedCrossRef Yang S, Zhan J, Xu X. Is TikTok a high-quality source of information on thyroid cancer? Endocrine. 2023;81(2):270–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Anastasio AT, Tabarestani TQ, Bagheri K, et al. A New Trend in Social Media and Medicine: The Poor Quality of Videos Related to Ankle Sprain Exercises on TikTok. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023;8(2):24730114231171116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Anastasio AT, Tabarestani TQ, Bagheri K, et al. A New Trend in Social Media and Medicine: The Poor Quality of Videos Related to Ankle Sprain Exercises on TikTok. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023;8(2):24730114231171116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zheng S, Tong X, Wan D, Hu C, Hu Q, Ke Q. Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;5(25):e47210.CrossRef Zheng S, Tong X, Wan D, Hu C, Hu Q, Ke Q. Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;5(25):e47210.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yeung A, Ng E, Abi-Jaoude E. TikTok and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study of Social Media Content Quality. Can J Psychiatry. 2022;67(12):899–906.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yeung A, Ng E, Abi-Jaoude E. TikTok and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study of Social Media Content Quality. Can J Psychiatry. 2022;67(12):899–906.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference O’Sullivan NJ, Nason G, Manecksha RP, O’Kelly F. The unintentional spread of misinformation on “TikTok”; A paediatric urological perspective. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(3):371–5.PubMedCrossRef O’Sullivan NJ, Nason G, Manecksha RP, O’Kelly F. The unintentional spread of misinformation on “TikTok”; A paediatric urological perspective. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(3):371–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Xu AJ, Taylor J, Gao T, Mihalcea R, Perez-Rosas V, Loeb S. TikTok and prostate cancer: misinformation and quality of information using validated questionnaires. Bju Int. 2021;128(4):435–7.PubMedCrossRef Xu AJ, Taylor J, Gao T, Mihalcea R, Perez-Rosas V, Loeb S. TikTok and prostate cancer: misinformation and quality of information using validated questionnaires. Bju Int. 2021;128(4):435–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Shan Y, Xing Z, Dong Z, Ji M, Wang D, Cao X. Translating and Adapting the DISCERN Instrument Into a Simplified Chinese Version and Validating Its Reliability: Development and Usability Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;2(25):e40733.CrossRef Shan Y, Xing Z, Dong Z, Ji M, Wang D, Cao X. Translating and Adapting the DISCERN Instrument Into a Simplified Chinese Version and Validating Its Reliability: Development and Usability Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;2(25):e40733.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bai G, Fu K, Fu W, Liu G. Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Public Health. 2022;15(10):924748.CrossRef Bai G, Fu K, Fu W, Liu G. Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Public Health. 2022;15(10):924748.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Song S, Xue X, Zhao YC, Li J, Zhu Q, Zhao M. Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e28318.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Song S, Xue X, Zhao YC, Li J, Zhu Q, Zhao M. Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e28318.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wolffsohn JS, Whayeb Y, Logan NS, Weng R. IMI-Global Trends in Myopia Management Attitudes and Strategies in Clinical Practice-2022 Update. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64(5):12.CrossRef Wolffsohn JS, Whayeb Y, Logan NS, Weng R. IMI-Global Trends in Myopia Management Attitudes and Strategies in Clinical Practice-2022 Update. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64(5):12.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ostrin LA, Harb E, Nickla DL, et al. IMI-The Dynamic Choroid: New Insights, Challenges, and Potential Significance for Human Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ostrin LA, Harb E, Nickla DL, et al. IMI-The Dynamic Choroid: New Insights, Challenges, and Potential Significance for Human Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kong W, Song S, Zhao YC, Zhu Q, Sha L. TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e30409.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kong W, Song S, Zhao YC, Zhu Q, Sha L. TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e30409.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wu J, Greene M, Bickett A, Song AH, Swartz JJ. Period pain is not normal: a content analysis of endometriosis-related videos on the social media platform TikTok. BJOG. 2023;130(12):1555–6.PubMedCrossRef Wu J, Greene M, Bickett A, Song AH, Swartz JJ. Period pain is not normal: a content analysis of endometriosis-related videos on the social media platform TikTok. BJOG. 2023;130(12):1555–6.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Costantini JG, Qi YA, Steinemann TL. Gone Viral: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Contact Lens-Related Videos on TikTok. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(11):479–84.PubMedCrossRef Costantini JG, Qi YA, Steinemann TL. Gone Viral: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Contact Lens-Related Videos on TikTok. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(11):479–84.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rehman R, Hasan S, Akram H, Jahnke M. TikTok as a Source of Dermatologic Information on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2022;33(6S):S133–4.PubMedCrossRef Rehman R, Hasan S, Akram H, Jahnke M. TikTok as a Source of Dermatologic Information on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2022;33(6S):S133–4.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Özkent MS, Kılınç MT. Female urinary incontinence on TikTok and YouTube: is online video content sufficient? Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(11):2775–81.PubMedCrossRef Özkent MS, Kılınç MT. Female urinary incontinence on TikTok and YouTube: is online video content sufficient? Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(11):2775–81.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Basch CH, Yalamanchili B, Fera J, Narayanan S. Most liked #monkeypox videos on TikTok: Implications for infection control. Am J Infect Control. 2024;52(1):123–4.PubMedCrossRef Basch CH, Yalamanchili B, Fera J, Narayanan S. Most liked #monkeypox videos on TikTok: Implications for infection control. Am J Infect Control. 2024;52(1):123–4.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Wu J, Greene M, Happ M, Trahair E, Montoya M, Swartz JJ. Medication abortion on TikTok: misinformation or reliable resource? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(6):749–51.PubMedCrossRef Wu J, Greene M, Happ M, Trahair E, Montoya M, Swartz JJ. Medication abortion on TikTok: misinformation or reliable resource? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(6):749–51.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lorenzo-Luaces L, Dierckman C, Adams S. Attitudes and (Mis)information About Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on TikTok: An Analysis of Video Content. J Med Internet Res. 2023;13(25):e45571.CrossRef Lorenzo-Luaces L, Dierckman C, Adams S. Attitudes and (Mis)information About Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on TikTok: An Analysis of Video Content. J Med Internet Res. 2023;13(25):e45571.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Gupta R, John J, Gupta M, et al. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Breast Reconstruction with Fat Grafting Content on TikTok. Arch Plast Surg. 2022;49(5):614–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gupta R, John J, Gupta M, et al. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Breast Reconstruction with Fat Grafting Content on TikTok. Arch Plast Surg. 2022;49(5):614–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
39.
go back to reference Wang L, Li Y, Gu J, Xiao L. A quality analysis of thyroid cancer videos available on TikTok. Front Public Health. 2023;23(11):1049728.CrossRef Wang L, Li Y, Gu J, Xiao L. A quality analysis of thyroid cancer videos available on TikTok. Front Public Health. 2023;23(11):1049728.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Gong X, Dong B, Li L, Shen D, Rong Z. TikTok video as a health education source of information on heart failure in China: a content analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11(11):1315393.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gong X, Dong B, Li L, Shen D, Rong Z. TikTok video as a health education source of information on heart failure in China: a content analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11(11):1315393.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Zheng DX, Mulligan KM, Scott JF. TikTok and dermatology: An opportunity for public health engagement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(1):e25–6.PubMedCrossRef Zheng DX, Mulligan KM, Scott JF. TikTok and dermatology: An opportunity for public health engagement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(1):e25–6.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Rein B. Making Science Education More Accessible: A Case Study of TikTok’s Utility as a Science Communication Tool. Neuroscience. 2023;15(530):192–200.CrossRef Rein B. Making Science Education More Accessible: A Case Study of TikTok’s Utility as a Science Communication Tool. Neuroscience. 2023;15(530):192–200.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Xue X, Yang X, Xu W, Liu G, Xie Y, Ji Z. TikTok as an Information Hodgepodge: Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of Genitourinary Cancers Related Content. Front Oncol. 2022;15(12):789956.CrossRef Xue X, Yang X, Xu W, Liu G, Xie Y, Ji Z. TikTok as an Information Hodgepodge: Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of Genitourinary Cancers Related Content. Front Oncol. 2022;15(12):789956.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference O’Donnell N, Jerin SI, Mu D. Using TikTok to Educate, Influence, or Inspire? A Content Analysis of Health-Related EduTok Videos. J Health Commun. 2023;28(8):539–51.PubMedCrossRef O’Donnell N, Jerin SI, Mu D. Using TikTok to Educate, Influence, or Inspire? A Content Analysis of Health-Related EduTok Videos. J Health Commun. 2023;28(8):539–51.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hu RH, Zhang HB, Yuan B, et al. Quality and accuracy of gastric cancer related videos in social media videos platforms. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2025.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hu RH, Zhang HB, Yuan B, et al. Quality and accuracy of gastric cancer related videos in social media videos platforms. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2025.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Myopia information on TikTok: analysis factors that impact video quality and audience engagement
Authors
Shuai Ming
Jie Han
Xi Yao
Xiaohong Guo
Qingge Guo
Bo Lei
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18687-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue