Skip to main content
Top
Published in: memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology 3/2023

Open Access 15-08-2023 | Myelodysplastic Syndrome | short review

FlASHback—personal highlights regarding myelodysplastic syndrome from the 2022 ASH meeting

Authors: Verena Petzer, Dominik Wolf

Published in: memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology | Issue 3/2023

Login to get access

Summary

This article intends to summarize and comment on some of the highlights regarding myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) presented at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting. Many abstracts dealt with the validation of the two new classifications and the International Prognostic Scoring System–Molecular (IPSS-M) being among the most intensively discussed topics in the community. Moreover, for the first time, real-world data on luspatercept were presented. Long-term data from the MEDALIST trial showed which patients benefit most from therapy with luspatercept, adding important information for the use of this substance. However, except for the phase III trial Sintra-REV, practice-changing clinical reports were sparse, although earlier trials in both higher-and lower-risk MDS reported on promising agents currently in clinical development that will hopefully improve the future management of MDS patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bernard E, Tuechler H, Greenberg PL, et al. Molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. N Eng J Med Evid. 2022;1(7):EVIDoa2200008. Bernard E, Tuechler H, Greenberg PL, et al. Molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. N Eng J Med Evid. 2022;1(7):EVIDoa2200008.
2.
go back to reference Sauta E, Robin M, Bersanelli M, et al. Real-world validation of molecular international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-M) for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1121–4.CrossRef Sauta E, Robin M, Bersanelli M, et al. Real-world validation of molecular international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-M) for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1121–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Aguirre LE, Al Ali N, Ball S, et al. Validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-M) risk stratification model for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1125–7.CrossRef Aguirre LE, Al Ali N, Ball S, et al. Validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-M) risk stratification model for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1125–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36(7):1703–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36(7):1703–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP, et al. International consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022;140(11):1200–28.CrossRefPubMed Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP, et al. International consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022;140(11):1200–28.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ball S, Singh AM, Al Ali N, et al. A product of clash of titans or true reflection of disease biology? Validation of 2022 WHO and ICC classifications in a large dataset of patients with Myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1118–20.CrossRef Ball S, Singh AM, Al Ali N, et al. A product of clash of titans or true reflection of disease biology? Validation of 2022 WHO and ICC classifications in a large dataset of patients with Myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1118–20.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Haferlach C, Huber S, Mueller H, et al. MDS classification—do we still have to count blasts? Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1130–1.CrossRef Haferlach C, Huber S, Mueller H, et al. MDS classification—do we still have to count blasts? Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1130–1.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Platzbecker U, Santini V, Komrokji RS, et al. Characterization of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes experiencing long-term responses with luspatercept in the MEDALIST study. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):9808–10.CrossRef Platzbecker U, Santini V, Komrokji RS, et al. Characterization of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes experiencing long-term responses with luspatercept in the MEDALIST study. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):9808–10.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Santini V, Fenaux P, Zeidan AM, et al. Overall survival and progression-free survival of patients following luspatercept treatment in the MEDALIST trial. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):4079–81.CrossRef Santini V, Fenaux P, Zeidan AM, et al. Overall survival and progression-free survival of patients following luspatercept treatment in the MEDALIST trial. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):4079–81.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Komrokji RS, Al Ali N, Ball S, et al. Luspatercept for treatment of lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes: real world data replicates medalist study results and confirms activity among hypomethylating agents and lenalidomide treated patients. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):4039–41.CrossRef Komrokji RS, Al Ali N, Ball S, et al. Luspatercept for treatment of lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes: real world data replicates medalist study results and confirms activity among hypomethylating agents and lenalidomide treated patients. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):4039–41.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mukherjee S, Brown-Bickerstaff C, McBride A, et al. Real-world outcomes of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) treated with luspatercept: an evaluation of US clinical practice utilization and treatment patterns. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):944–6.CrossRef Mukherjee S, Brown-Bickerstaff C, McBride A, et al. Real-world outcomes of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) treated with luspatercept: an evaluation of US clinical practice utilization and treatment patterns. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):944–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, et al. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00874-7.CrossRef Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, et al. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(23)00874-7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference López Cadenas F, Lumbreras E, González T, et al. Evaluation of lenalidomide (LEN) vs placebo in non-transfusion dependent low risk del(5q) MDS patients. Final results of sintra-REV phase III international multicenter clinical trial. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1109–11.CrossRef López Cadenas F, Lumbreras E, González T, et al. Evaluation of lenalidomide (LEN) vs placebo in non-transfusion dependent low risk del(5q) MDS patients. Final results of sintra-REV phase III international multicenter clinical trial. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1109–11.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Toribio Castelló SM, Lopez-Cadenas F, Preudhomme C, et al. Long-term evolution of somatic mutations in patients with del(5q) MDS early treated with lenalidomide in the sintra-rev clinical trial: safe and effecitive approach? Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):9740–3.CrossRef Toribio Castelló SM, Lopez-Cadenas F, Preudhomme C, et al. Long-term evolution of somatic mutations in patients with del(5q) MDS early treated with lenalidomide in the sintra-rev clinical trial: safe and effecitive approach? Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):9740–3.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sperling AS, Guerra VA, Kennedy JA, et al. Lenalidomide promotes the development of TP53-mutated therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2022;140(16):1753–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sperling AS, Guerra VA, Kennedy JA, et al. Lenalidomide promotes the development of TP53-mutated therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2022;140(16):1753–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Platzbecker U, Komrokji RS, Fenaux P, et al. Imetelstat achieved prolonged, continuous transfusion independence (TI) in patients with heavily transfused non-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS) relapsed/refractory (R/R) to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESas) within the Imerge phase 2 study. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1106–8.CrossRef Platzbecker U, Komrokji RS, Fenaux P, et al. Imetelstat achieved prolonged, continuous transfusion independence (TI) in patients with heavily transfused non-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS) relapsed/refractory (R/R) to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESas) within the Imerge phase 2 study. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1106–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, et al. Continuous tranfusion independence with Imetelstat in heavily transfused NON-DEL(5Q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes relapsed/refractory to Erythropoiesis stimulating agents in Imerge phase 3 topic: MPN and MDS: targeting red cells and platelets. 2023; 165. Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, et al. Continuous tranfusion independence with Imetelstat in heavily transfused NON-DEL(5Q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes relapsed/refractory to Erythropoiesis stimulating agents in Imerge phase 3 topic: MPN and MDS: targeting red cells and platelets. 2023; 165.
18.
go back to reference Zeidan AM, Ando K, Rauzy O, et al. Primary results of stimulus-MDS1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of TIM‑3 inhibition with sabatolimab added to Hypomethylating agents (HMas) in adult patients with higher-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):2063–5.CrossRef Zeidan AM, Ando K, Rauzy O, et al. Primary results of stimulus-MDS1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of TIM‑3 inhibition with sabatolimab added to Hypomethylating agents (HMas) in adult patients with higher-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):2063–5.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brunner AM, Esteve J, Porkka K, et al. Efficacy and safety of sabatolimab (MBG453) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMas) in patients (pts) with very high/high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (vHR/HR-MDS) and acute Myeloid leukemia (AML): final analysis from a phase Ib study. Blood. 2021;138(Supplement 1):244–244.CrossRef Brunner AM, Esteve J, Porkka K, et al. Efficacy and safety of sabatolimab (MBG453) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMas) in patients (pts) with very high/high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (vHR/HR-MDS) and acute Myeloid leukemia (AML): final analysis from a phase Ib study. Blood. 2021;138(Supplement 1):244–244.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Garcia-Manero G, McCloskey J, Griffiths EA, et al. Pharmacokinetic exposure equivalence and preliminary efficacy and safety from a randomized cross over phase 3 study (ASCERTAIN study) of an oral Hypomethylating agent ASTX727 (cedazuridine/decitabine) compared to IV Decitabine. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):846.CrossRef Garcia-Manero G, McCloskey J, Griffiths EA, et al. Pharmacokinetic exposure equivalence and preliminary efficacy and safety from a randomized cross over phase 3 study (ASCERTAIN study) of an oral Hypomethylating agent ASTX727 (cedazuridine/decitabine) compared to IV Decitabine. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):846.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bernard E, Nannya Y, Hasserjian RP, et al. Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Med. 2020;26(10):1549–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bernard E, Nannya Y, Hasserjian RP, et al. Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Med. 2020;26(10):1549–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Savona MR, McCloskey JK, Griffiths EA, et al. Prolonged survival in Bi-allelic TP53-mutated (TP53mut) MDS subjects treated with oral decitabine/cedazuridine in the ascertain trial (ASTX727-02). Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):2066–9.CrossRef Savona MR, McCloskey JK, Griffiths EA, et al. Prolonged survival in Bi-allelic TP53-mutated (TP53mut) MDS subjects treated with oral decitabine/cedazuridine in the ascertain trial (ASTX727-02). Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):2066–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Takahashi K, Patel K, Bueso-Ramos C, et al. Clinical implications of TP53 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes treated with hypomethylating agents. Oncotarget. 2016;7(12):14172–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Takahashi K, Patel K, Bueso-Ramos C, et al. Clinical implications of TP53 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes treated with hypomethylating agents. Oncotarget. 2016;7(12):14172–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
FlASHback—personal highlights regarding myelodysplastic syndrome from the 2022 ASH meeting
Authors
Verena Petzer
Dominik Wolf
Publication date
15-08-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1865-5041
Electronic ISSN: 1865-5076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-023-00900-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology 3/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine