Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 3/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Research

“My Plate is Full”: Reasons for Declining a Genetic Evaluation of Hearing Loss

Authors: Marci M. Lesperance, Erin Winkler, Tori L. Melendez, Beverly M. Yashar

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to obtain patient and parent perspectives on genetic evaluation of hearing loss, in order to identify motivators, expectations, and barriers. Three focus groups were conducted following a semi-structured discussion guide, led by an independent moderator. Participants were hearing parents of children with permanent hearing loss or deaf adults. Qualitative content analysis was used to develop a codebook and identify major themes and subthemes. Participant views were compared to national guidelines. The 28 participants comprised 23 parents representing 21 unique families and 5 deaf adults. 13/21 families and 0/5 adults reported comorbidities, 4/21 families and 3/5 adults had a positive family history, and 12/21 families versus 0/5 adults had utilized genetics services. A common theme among adults and parents was a curiosity as to the cause of hearing loss. Parents were motivated to detect comorbidities and optimize care for hearing loss. Some parents felt overwhelmed by the hearing loss and unprepared to pursue early genetic evaluation as recommended in guidelines. Several reported positive experiences following genetics consultation, while others reported unease and unmet expectations. Notably, both parents and adults expressed ambivalence regarding the desire for genetic knowledge. Financial concerns and difficulties obtaining a referral were cited as extrinsic barriers. For parents of children with hearing loss, both the presence of comorbidities and a positive family history were drivers of genetics consultation and/or genetic testing. We identified educational opportunities for both patients and providers that would improve informed decision-making and increase access to genetic services. Consideration of the patient/family perspective and their decision-making processes, along with flexibility in the approach to genetics evaluation and its timing, will optimize both the development and implementation of guidelines.
Literature
ACMG. (2000). American College of Medical Genetics. Statement of the American College of Medical Genetics on universal newborn hearing screening. Genetics in Medicine, 2, 149–150.CrossRef
Alford, R. L., Arnos, K. S., Fox, M., Lin, J. W., Palmer, C. G., Pandya, A., Rehm, H. L., Robin, N. H., Scott, D. A., & Yoshinaga-Itano, C. (2014). American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline for the clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss. Genetics in Medicine, 16(4), 347–355.CrossRefPubMed
Boudreault, P., Baldwin, E. E., Fox, M., Dutton, L., Tullis, L. E., Linden, J., Kobayashi, Y., Zhou, J., Sinsheimer, J. S., Sininger, Y., Grody, W. W., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2010). Deaf adults reasons for genetic testing depend on cultural affiliation: Results from a prospective, longitudinal genetic counseling and testing study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 209–227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Brunger, J. W., Murray, G. S., O'Riordan, M., Matthews, A. L., Smith, R. J., & Robin, N. H. (2000). Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 67(6), 1621–1625.CrossRefPubMed
Burton, S. K., Withrow, K., Arnos, K. S., Kalfoglou, A. L., & Pandya, A. (2006). A focus group study of consumer attitudes toward genetic testing and newborn screening for deafness. Genetics in Medicine, 8(12), 779–783.CrossRefPubMed
Cohen, J. S., & Biesecker, B. B. (2010). Quality of life in rare genetic conditions: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 152a(5), 1136–1156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Dagan, O., Hochner, H., Levi, H., Raas-Rothschild, A., & Sagi, M. (2002). Genetic testing for hearing loss: Different motivations for the same outcome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 113(2), 137–143.CrossRefPubMed
Duncan, R. D., Prucka, S., Wiatrak, B. J., Smith, R. J., & Robin, N. H. (2007). Pediatric otolaryngologists' use of genetic testing. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 133(3), 231–236.CrossRef
Fisher, H. R., McKevitt, C., & Boaz, A. (2011). Why do parents enroll their children in research: A narrative synthesis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 544–551.CrossRefPubMed
Genetics in Primary Care Institute Website (2015). geneticsinprimarycare.aap.org. Web. 1 Oct. 2015, from geneticsinprimarycare.aap.org.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2006). Attitudes to genetic testing for deafness: The importance of informed choice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(1), 51–59.CrossRefPubMed
Hammers, E. (Ed.). (2009). Innovations in service delivery in the age of genomics workshop summary. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Kaimal, G., Steinberg, A. G., Ennis, S., Harasink, S. M., Ewing, R., & Li, Y. (2007). Parental narratives about genetic testing for hearing loss: A one year follow up study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 775–787.CrossRefPubMed
Kaye, C. I. (2012). Genetic service delivery: Infrastructure, assessment and information. Public Health Genomics, 15(3–4), 164–171.CrossRefPubMed
Kemper, A. R., & Downs, S. M. (2000). A cost-effectiveness analysis of newborn hearing screening strategies. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154(5), 484–488.CrossRefPubMed
Kiedrowski, L.A., Owens, K.M., Yashar, B.M., Schuette, J.L. (2016). Parents' perspectives on variants of uncertain significance from chromosome microarray analysis. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(1), 101–111.
Martinez, A., Linden, J., Schimmenti, L. A., & Palmer, C. G. (2003). Attitudes of the broader hearing, deaf, and hard-of-hearing community toward genetic testing for deafness. Genetics in Medicine, 5(2), 106–112.CrossRefPubMed
McAllister, M., Davies, L., Payne, K., Nicholls, S., Donnai, D., & MacLeod, R. (2007). The emotional effects of genetic diseases: Implications for clinical genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 143(22), 2651–2661.CrossRef
Middleton, A., Hewison, J., & Mueller, R. F. (1998). Attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for hereditary deafness. American Journal of Human Genetics, 63(4), 1175–1180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Middleton, A., Hewison, J., & Mueller, R. (2001). Prenatal diagnosis for inherited deafness--what is the potential demand? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(2), 121–131.CrossRefPubMed
Middleton, A., Emery, S. D., & Turner, G. H. (2010). Views, knowledge, and beliefs and genetics and genetic counselling among deaf people. Sign Language Studies, 10, 170–196.CrossRef
Morton, N. E. (1991). Genetic epidemiology of hearing impairment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 630, 16–31.CrossRefPubMed
Morzaria, S., Westerberg, B. D., & Kozak, F. K. (2005). Evidence-based algorithm for the evaluation of a child with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The Journal of Otolaryngology, 34(5), 297–303.CrossRefPubMed
Mulley, A. G., Trimble, C., & Elwyn, G. (2012). Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter. BMJ, 345, e6572.CrossRefPubMed
Palmer, C. G., Martinez, A., Fox, M., Sininger, Y., Grody, W. W., & Schimmenti, L. A. (2008). Ethnic differences in parental perceptions of genetic testing for deaf infants. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(1), 129–138.CrossRefPubMed
Palmer, C. G., Lueddeke, J. T., & Zhou, J. (2009). Factors influencing parental decision about genetics evaluation for their deaf or hard-of-hearing child. Genetics in Medicine, 11(4), 248–255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Ross, L. F., Saal, H. M., David, K. L., & Anderson, R. R. (2013). Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genetics in Medicine, 15(3), 234–245.CrossRefPubMed
Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Shearer, A.E., DeLuca, A.P., Hildebrand, M.S., Taylor, K.R., Gurrola, J., Scherer, S., Scheetz, T.E., Smith, R.J.H. (2010). Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(49), 21104–21109.CrossRef
Steinberg, A. G., Kaimal, G., Bain, L., Krantz, I., & Li, Y. (2007). Parental narratives on genetic testing for children with hearing loss: A qualitative inquiry. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 143a(14), 1533–1545.CrossRefPubMed
Stern, S. J., Arnos, K. S., Murrelle, L., Welch, K. O., Nance, W. E., & Pandya, A. (2002). Attitudes of deaf and hard of hearing subjects towards genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis of hearing loss. Journal of Medical Genetics, 39(6), 449–453.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Taneja, P. R., Pandya, A., Foley, D. L., Nicely, L. V., & Arnos, K. S. (2004). Attitudes of deaf individuals towards genetic testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 130a(1), 17–21.CrossRefPubMed
Whelan, A. J., Ball, S., Best, L., Best, R. G., Echiverri, S. C., Ganschow, P., et al. (2004). Genetic red flags: Clues to thinking genetically in primary care practice. Primary Care; Clinics in Office Practice, 31(3), 497–508.CrossRefPubMed
White, K. R. (2003). The current status of EHDI programs in the United States. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9(2), 79–88.CrossRefPubMed
Withrow, K. A., Burton, S., Arnos, K. S., Kalfoglou, A., & Pandya, A. (2008). Consumer motivations for pursuing genetic testing and their preferences for the provision of genetic services for hearing loss. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(3), 252–260.CrossRefPubMed
Yoshinaga-Itano, C. (2003). Early intervention after universal neonatal hearing screening: Impact on outcomes. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9(4), 252–266.CrossRefPubMed
Yoshinaga-Itano C, Abdala de Uzcategui C. (2001). Early identification and social-emotional factors of children with hearing loss and children screened for hearing loss. In: Kurtzer-White E, Luterman D, eds: Early Childhood Deafness. Baltimore, MD: York Press: 13–28.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A. L., Coulter, D. K., & Mehl, A. L. (1998). Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics, 102(5), 1161–1171.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
“My Plate is Full”: Reasons for Declining a Genetic Evaluation of Hearing Loss
Authors
Marci M. Lesperance
Erin Winkler
Tori L. Melendez
Beverly M. Yashar
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0149-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Genetic Counseling 3/2018 Go to the issue

Original Research

Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study

Original Research

Limitations and Pitfalls of Using Family Letters to Communicate Genetic Risk: a Qualitative Study with Patients and Healthcare Professionals

Original Research

“Yeah that Made a Big Difference!”: The Importance of the Relationship between Health Professionals and Fathers Who Have a Child with Down Syndrome

Original Research

Assessment of Current Genetic Counselor Practices in Post-Visit Written Communications to Patients

News

Message from the Editor-in-Chief

Original Research

The Experience of Genetic Counselors Working with Patients Facing the Decision of Pregnancy Termination after 24 Weeks Gestation