Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Musculoskeletal biomechanics of patients with or without adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion

Authors: Mazda Farshad, Pascal Raffael Furrer, Florian Wanivenhaus, Lukas Urbanschitz, Marco Senteler

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Study design

A retrospective, single center, case-control study was performed.

Objective

The present study employed patient-specific biomechanical modeling to find potential biomechanical differences after spinal fusion at L4/5 in patients with and without subsequent development of adjacent segment disease (ASD).

Methods

The study population comprised patients who underwent primary spinal fusion at L4/5 and were either asymptomatic during > 4 years of follow-up (CTRL; n = 18) or underwent revision surgery for ASD at L3/4 (n = 20). Landmarks were annotated on preoperative and follow-up lateral radiographs, and specific musculoskeletal models were created using a custom-built modeling pipeline. Simulated spinal muscle activation and lumbar intervertebral shear loads in unfused segments were analyzed in upright standing and forward flexion. Differences between the pre- and postoperative conditions were computed for each patient.

Results

The average postoperative muscle activity in the upright standing posture was 88.4% of the preoperative activity in the CTRL group (p <  0.0001), but did not significantly change from pre- to postoperatively in the ASD group (98.0%). The average shear load magnitude at the epifusional joint L3/4 during upright standing increased from pre- to postoperatively in the ASD group (+ 3.9 N, +/− 17.4 (n = 18)), but decreased in the CTRL group (− 4.6 N, +/− 23.3 (n = 20); p <  0.001).

Conclusion

Patient-specific biomechanical simulation revealed that spinal fusion surgery resulted in greater shear load magnitude and muscle activation and therefore greater forces at the epifusional segment in those with ASD compared with those without ASD. This is a first report of patient-specific disc load and muscle force calculation with predictive merits for ASD.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1938–44.CrossRef Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1938–44.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, et al. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:1560–6. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, et al. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:1560–6.
24.
go back to reference Senteler M, Weisse B, Rothenfluh DA, Farshad MT, Snedeker JG. Fusion angle affects intervertebral adjacent spinal segment joint forces-Model-based analysis of patient specific alignment. J Orthop Res. 2017:35:131–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23357. Senteler M, Weisse B, Rothenfluh DA, Farshad MT, Snedeker JG. Fusion angle affects intervertebral adjacent spinal segment joint forces-Model-based analysis of patient specific alignment. J Orthop Res. 2017:35:131–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jor.​23357.
Metadata
Title
Musculoskeletal biomechanics of patients with or without adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion
Authors
Mazda Farshad
Pascal Raffael Furrer
Florian Wanivenhaus
Lukas Urbanschitz
Marco Senteler
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04916-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021 Go to the issue