Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Knee

Muscle torque in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches

Authors: Chih-Hung Chang, Rong-Sen Yang, Kuang-Ho Chen, Tang-Kue Liu, Wen-Chih Chen, Yi-Ching Ho, Sheng-Mou Hou

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The subvastus and midvastus approaches are two of the most commonly performed quadriceps preserving approaches for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can hasten functional recovery and rehabilitation. However, there has not been sufficient investigation with respect to a quantitative comparison between the two approaches in terms of muscle strength. To compare outcomes with respect to muscle strength between these two approaches, quadriceps and hamstring muscle torques of 20 patients who underwent primary TKA with the subvastus (SV) approach and 10 patients who received the midvastus (MV) approach were measured after surgery. The median age of patients in the SV group (68 years, range 53–77 years) was significantly different that the median age of patients in the MV group (61 years, range 50–73 years) (P = 0.0141). There was no significant difference in patient weight, height, or postoperative duration before muscle testing between the SV and MV groups. There were no significant differences in peak muscle torque or hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio between the groups. We thus conclude peak muscle torque and H/Q ratios were not statistically different with the SV or MV approach, therefore functional outcome is comparable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berth A, Urbach D, Neumann W, Awiszus F (2007) Strength and voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris muscle in total knee arthroplasty with midvastus and subvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 22:83–88CrossRefPubMed Berth A, Urbach D, Neumann W, Awiszus F (2007) Strength and voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris muscle in total knee arthroplasty with midvastus and subvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 22:83–88CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Boyd AD Jr, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB (1993) Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:674–681PubMed Boyd AD Jr, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB (1993) Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:674–681PubMed
3.
go back to reference Callaghan M, Babu V, Ellis D, Samarji R (2009) Electromyographic comparison of the mid-vastus and sub-vastus approaches to total knee arthroplasty. Curr Orthop Pract 20:442–447CrossRef Callaghan M, Babu V, Ellis D, Samarji R (2009) Electromyographic comparison of the mid-vastus and sub-vastus approaches to total knee arthroplasty. Curr Orthop Pract 20:442–447CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chang CH, Chen KH, Yang RS, Liu TK (2002) Muscle torques in total knee arthroplasty with subvastus and parapatellar approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res 98:189–195CrossRef Chang CH, Chen KH, Yang RS, Liu TK (2002) Muscle torques in total knee arthroplasty with subvastus and parapatellar approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res 98:189–195CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dalury DF, Snow RG, Adams MJ (2008) Electromyographic evaluation of the midvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 23:136–140CrossRefPubMed Dalury DF, Snow RG, Adams MJ (2008) Electromyographic evaluation of the midvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 23:136–140CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference de Haan A, Gerrits KHL, de Ruiter CJ (2009) Counterpoint: the interpolated twitch does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle. J Appl Physiol 107:355–357CrossRefPubMed de Haan A, Gerrits KHL, de Ruiter CJ (2009) Counterpoint: the interpolated twitch does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle. J Appl Physiol 107:355–357CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Floren M, Davis J, Peterson MGE, Laskin RS (2007) A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Arthroplasty 22:51–57CrossRefPubMed Floren M, Davis J, Peterson MGE, Laskin RS (2007) A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Arthroplasty 22:51–57CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Haas SB, Manitta MA, Burdick P (2006) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:112–116CrossRefPubMed Haas SB, Manitta MA, Burdick P (2006) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:112–116CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference In Y, Kim JM, Choi NY, Kim SJ (2007) Large thigh girth is a relative contraindication for the subvastus approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:569–573CrossRefPubMed In Y, Kim JM, Choi NY, Kim SJ (2007) Large thigh girth is a relative contraindication for the subvastus approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:569–573CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Laskin RS (2007) Surgical exposure for total knee arthroplasty. For everything there is a season. J Anthroplasty 22:12–14CrossRef Laskin RS (2007) Surgical exposure for total knee arthroplasty. For everything there is a season. J Anthroplasty 22:12–14CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lin HT, Hsu AT, Chang JH, Chien CS, Chang GL (2008) Comparison of EMG activity between maximal manual muscle testing and cybex maximal isometric testing of the quadriceps femoris. J Formos Med Assoc 107:175–180CrossRefPubMed Lin HT, Hsu AT, Chang JH, Chien CS, Chang GL (2008) Comparison of EMG activity between maximal manual muscle testing and cybex maximal isometric testing of the quadriceps femoris. J Formos Med Assoc 107:175–180CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pagnano MW, Meneghini RM (2006) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty with an optimized subvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 21(4 Suppl 1):22–26CrossRefPubMed Pagnano MW, Meneghini RM (2006) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty with an optimized subvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 21(4 Suppl 1):22–26CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rand JA (1994) The patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:612–620PubMed Rand JA (1994) The patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:612–620PubMed
14.
go back to reference Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr AR (2007) Evaluation of complications associated with 600 mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:76–81CrossRefPubMed Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr AR (2007) Evaluation of complications associated with 600 mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:76–81CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr AR (2008) Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:19–25CrossRefPubMed Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr AR (2008) Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:19–25CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Seyler TM, Bonutti PM, Ulrich SD, Fatscher T, Marker DR, Mont MA (2007) Minimally invasive lateral approach to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:21–26CrossRefPubMed Seyler TM, Bonutti PM, Ulrich SD, Fatscher T, Marker DR, Mont MA (2007) Minimally invasive lateral approach to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:21–26CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Pratt JA, McClung CD, Schmalzried TP (2003) Knee strength after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:605–611CrossRefPubMed Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Pratt JA, McClung CD, Schmalzried TP (2003) Knee strength after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:605–611CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Taylor JL (2009) Point: the interpolated twitch does/does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle. J Appl Physiol 107:354–355CrossRefPubMed Taylor JL (2009) Point: the interpolated twitch does/does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle. J Appl Physiol 107:354–355CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tria AJ (2000) Surgical principles of total knee replacement: incisions, extensor mechanism, ligament balancing. In: Pellicci PM, Tria AJ, Garvin KL (eds) Orthopaedic knowledge update hip and knee reconstruction, 2nd edn. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, IL, pp 281–282 Tria AJ (2000) Surgical principles of total knee replacement: incisions, extensor mechanism, ligament balancing. In: Pellicci PM, Tria AJ, Garvin KL (eds) Orthopaedic knowledge update hip and knee reconstruction, 2nd edn. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, IL, pp 281–282
20.
go back to reference Tsauo JY, Li WC, Yang RS (2006) Functional outcomes after endoprosthetic knee reconstruction following resection of osteosarcoma near the knee. Disabil Rehabil 28:61–66CrossRefPubMed Tsauo JY, Li WC, Yang RS (2006) Functional outcomes after endoprosthetic knee reconstruction following resection of osteosarcoma near the knee. Disabil Rehabil 28:61–66CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Weinrauch P, Myers N, Wilkinson M, Dodsworth J, Fitzpatrick P, Whitehouse S (2006) Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. J Orthop Surg 14:47–52 Weinrauch P, Myers N, Wilkinson M, Dodsworth J, Fitzpatrick P, Whitehouse S (2006) Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. J Orthop Surg 14:47–52
Metadata
Title
Muscle torque in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches
Authors
Chih-Hung Chang
Rong-Sen Yang
Kuang-Ho Chen
Tang-Kue Liu
Wen-Chih Chen
Yi-Ching Ho
Sheng-Mou Hou
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1066-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2010 Go to the issue