Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2011

01-12-2011

Multivisceral Resections in Pancreatic Cancer: Identification of Risk Factors

Authors: Christoph M. Burdelski, Matthias Reeh, Dean Bogoevski, Florian Gebauer, Michael Tachezy, Yogesh K. Vashist, Guellue Cataldegirmen, Emre Yekebas, Jakob R. Izbicki, Maximilian Bockhorn

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is an assumption that multivisceral resections (MVRs) in patients with a pancreatic malignancy are associated with higher morbidity. The oncologic benefit, however, remains controversial.

Methods

The aim was to identify risk factors for complications in cases of MVR in patients with pancreatic cancer. Of 1099 patients who underwent major pancreatic resection at our institution between January 1992 and October 2008, a total of 55 were treated with an MVR involving resection of one or more additional organs. This group was compared with 154 patients who had palliative bypass surgery and 303 patients who underwent standard pancreatic head resection.

Results

Multivisceral resection patients had an overall higher incidence of major surgical complications (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was comparable in all groups. Median survival after MVR was inferior to that after standard resection but was significantly better than that after palliative bypass. Univariate logistic regression analysis identified concomitant colon, kidney, and liver resections and any intraoperative transfusion as predictors of complications; in the multivariate analysis, only kidney resections and any intraoperative transfusion were confirmed predictors. In contrast, T status, kidney resection, resection of four or more organs, any postoperative transfusion, and intensive care unit stay of >2 days were identified as predictors of survival in the univariate Cox regression analysis; in the multivariate analysis, only the T status was confirmed. Median survival after MVR was 16 months, after palliative bypass 6 months, and after standard resection 18 months (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Multivisceral resections are technically feasible procedures with increased survival when compared to palliative bypass procedures. The incidence of postoperative complications was increased with kidney resection and when intraoperative transfusion was required.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN et al (2008) Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 143:75–83 discussion 83PubMedCrossRef Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN et al (2008) Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 143:75–83 discussion 83PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H et al (2004) A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 350:1200–1210PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H et al (2004) A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 350:1200–1210PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M et al (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:586–594PubMedCrossRef Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M et al (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:586–594PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ et al (1996) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does it have a role in the palliation of pancreatic cancer? Ann Surg 223:718–725 discussion 725–728PubMedCrossRef Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ et al (1996) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does it have a role in the palliation of pancreatic cancer? Ann Surg 223:718–725 discussion 725–728PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D, Cataldegirmen G et al (2008) En bloc vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies infiltrating major blood vessels: perioperative outcome and long-term survival in 136 patients. Ann Surg 247:300–309PubMedCrossRef Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D, Cataldegirmen G et al (2008) En bloc vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies infiltrating major blood vessels: perioperative outcome and long-term survival in 136 patients. Ann Surg 247:300–309PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yamada H, Hirano S, Tanaka E et al (2006) Surgical treatment of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 8:85–88 Yamada H, Hirano S, Tanaka E et al (2006) Surgical treatment of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 8:85–88
9.
go back to reference Bockhorn M, Cataldegirmen G, Kutup A et al (2009) Crossing the Rubicon: when pancreatic resection with curative intent ends in an R2 status—impact of “desmoplastic pseudo-pancreatitis” and anatomical site of irresectability. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1212–1221PubMedCrossRef Bockhorn M, Cataldegirmen G, Kutup A et al (2009) Crossing the Rubicon: when pancreatic resection with curative intent ends in an R2 status—impact of “desmoplastic pseudo-pancreatitis” and anatomical site of irresectability. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1212–1221PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG et al (2005) A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 138:618–628 discussion 628–630PubMedCrossRef Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG et al (2005) A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 138:618–628 discussion 628–630PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Amano H, Miura F, Toyota N et al (2009) Pancreatectomy with reconstruction of the right and left hepatic arteries for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:777–780PubMedCrossRef Amano H, Miura F, Toyota N et al (2009) Pancreatectomy with reconstruction of the right and left hepatic arteries for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:777–780PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Toomey P, Hernandez J, Morton C et al (2009) Resection of portovenous structures to obtain microscopically negative margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is worthwhile. Am Surg 75:804–809 discussion 809–810PubMed Toomey P, Hernandez J, Morton C et al (2009) Resection of portovenous structures to obtain microscopically negative margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is worthwhile. Am Surg 75:804–809 discussion 809–810PubMed
13.
go back to reference Strobel O, Hackert T, Hartwig W et al (2009) Survival data justifies resection for pancreatic metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3340–3344PubMedCrossRef Strobel O, Hackert T, Hartwig W et al (2009) Survival data justifies resection for pancreatic metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3340–3344PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hirano S, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T et al (2007) Feasibility of en-bloc wedge resection of the pancreas and/or the duodenum as an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy for advanced gallbladder cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:149–154PubMedCrossRef Hirano S, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T et al (2007) Feasibility of en-bloc wedge resection of the pancreas and/or the duodenum as an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy for advanced gallbladder cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:149–154PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fusai G, Warnaar N, Sabin CA et al (2008) Outcome of R1 resection in patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:1309–1315PubMedCrossRef Fusai G, Warnaar N, Sabin CA et al (2008) Outcome of R1 resection in patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:1309–1315PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC et al (2007) Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 246:52–60PubMedCrossRef Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC et al (2007) Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 246:52–60PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV et al (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237PubMedCrossRef Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV et al (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kato K, Yamada S, Sugimoto H et al (2009) Prognostic factors for survival after extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: influence of resection margin status on survival. Pancreas 38:605–612PubMedCrossRef Kato K, Yamada S, Sugimoto H et al (2009) Prognostic factors for survival after extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: influence of resection margin status on survival. Pancreas 38:605–612PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Menon KV, Gomez D, Smith AM et al (2009) Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP). HPB (Oxford) 11:18–24 Menon KV, Gomez D, Smith AM et al (2009) Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP). HPB (Oxford) 11:18–24
20.
go back to reference Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D et al (2011) Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg 98:86–92PubMedCrossRef Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D et al (2011) Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg 98:86–92PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U et al (2009) Multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: risk-analysis and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 250:81–87PubMedCrossRef Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U et al (2009) Multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: risk-analysis and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 250:81–87PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598PubMedCrossRef Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multivisceral Resections in Pancreatic Cancer: Identification of Risk Factors
Authors
Christoph M. Burdelski
Matthias Reeh
Dean Bogoevski
Florian Gebauer
Michael Tachezy
Yogesh K. Vashist
Guellue Cataldegirmen
Emre Yekebas
Jakob R. Izbicki
Maximilian Bockhorn
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1263-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2011

World Journal of Surgery 12/2011 Go to the issue