Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Multiple Sclerosis | Research

Patient and nurse preference for Sensoready autoinjector pen versus other autoinjectors in multiple sclerosis: results from a pilot multicenter survey

Authors: Amy Perrin Ross, Christian Besser, Shubhanvita Naval, Dee Stoneman, Harriet Gaunt, Noreen Barker

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sensoready® autoinjector pen facilitates self-administration of subcutaneous ofatumumab injections at home. We aim to investigate patient and nurse preference for using Sensoready® versus comparator autoinjectors in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

A pilot survey was conducted in Germany followed by in-field interviews across United States, Germany, France, and Italy. The survey recruited 80 MS patients and 50 MS nurses. Respondents were interviewed for 45-min on qualitative open-ended and quantitative close-ended survey consisting of 31 questions for patients and 41 for nurses. Ratings were measured on Likert scale from 1 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important).

Results

“Easy to perform self-injection with the pen” and “Patient able to use independently” (both, mean overall score 9.4) were the most important attributes for both patients and nurses. Sensoready® scored high across most important attributes for both patients and nurses (p < 0.05). Sensoready® was preferred over comparator devices across majority of the important attributes (84%; p < 0.05), especially ease of use of the pen (mean overall score 9.4). Sensoready® was preferred over their current device by 9/10 nurses and 8/10 patients if they had to choose a treatment based on the device alone.

Conclusion

Both MS patients and nurses preferred the Sensoready® (ofatumumab) over comparator autoinjectors for their treatment, mostly driven by ease of administration.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Comi G, Bar-Or A, Lassmann H. Role of B Cells in multiple sclerosis and related disorders. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(1):13–23.CrossRefPubMed Comi G, Bar-Or A, Lassmann H. Role of B Cells in multiple sclerosis and related disorders. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(1):13–23.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cotchett KR, Dittel BN, Obeidat AZ. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 B Cells depleting drugs in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2021;49: 102787.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cotchett KR, Dittel BN, Obeidat AZ. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 B Cells depleting drugs in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2021;49: 102787.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Negron A, Robinson RR, Stüve O, Forsthuber TG. The role of B cells in multiple sclerosis: Current and future therapies. Cell Immunol. 2019;339:10–23.CrossRefPubMed Negron A, Robinson RR, Stüve O, Forsthuber TG. The role of B cells in multiple sclerosis: Current and future therapies. Cell Immunol. 2019;339:10–23.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bar-Or A, Grove RA, Austin DJ, Tolson JM, VanMeter SA, Lewis EW, et al. Subcutaneous ofatumumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: The MIRROR study. Neurology. 2018;90(20):e1805–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bar-Or A, Grove RA, Austin DJ, Tolson JM, VanMeter SA, Lewis EW, et al. Subcutaneous ofatumumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: The MIRROR study. Neurology. 2018;90(20):e1805–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, et al. Ofatumumab versus teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):546–57.CrossRefPubMed Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, et al. Ofatumumab versus teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):546–57.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Klein C, Lammens A, Schäfer W, Georges G, Schwaiger M, Mössner E, et al. Epitope interactions of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 and their relationship to functional properties. mAbs. 2013;5(1):22–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klein C, Lammens A, Schäfer W, Georges G, Schwaiger M, Mössner E, et al. Epitope interactions of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 and their relationship to functional properties. mAbs. 2013;5(1):22–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference KESIMPTA. EPAR. Available from Kesimpta | European Medicines Agency (europa.eu) KESIMPTA. EPAR. Available from Kesimpta | European Medicines Agency (europa.eu)
10.
go back to reference Bar-Or A FE, Goodyear A, et al. Onset of B-cell depletion with subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: results from the APLIOS bioequivalence study. Poster presentation at ACTRIMS, West Palm Beach, FL2020. Bar-Or A FE, Goodyear A, et al. Onset of B-cell depletion with subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: results from the APLIOS bioequivalence study. Poster presentation at ACTRIMS, West Palm Beach, FL2020.
11.
go back to reference Ridyard CH, Dawoud DM, Tuersley LV, Hughes DA. A Systematic review of patients’ perspectives on the subcutaneous route of medication administration. The patient. 2016;9(4):281–92. Ridyard CH, Dawoud DM, Tuersley LV, Hughes DA. A Systematic review of patients’ perspectives on the subcutaneous route of medication administration. The patient. 2016;9(4):281–92.
12.
go back to reference Bayas A. Improving adherence to injectable disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10(3):285–7.CrossRefPubMed Bayas A. Improving adherence to injectable disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10(3):285–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lugaresi A, Rottoli MR, Patti F. Fostering adherence to injectable disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(9):1029–42.CrossRefPubMed Lugaresi A, Rottoli MR, Patti F. Fostering adherence to injectable disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(9):1029–42.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lugaresi A. Addressing the need for increased adherence to multiple sclerosis therapy: can delivery technology enhance patient motivation? Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2009;6(9):995–1002.CrossRefPubMed Lugaresi A. Addressing the need for increased adherence to multiple sclerosis therapy: can delivery technology enhance patient motivation? Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2009;6(9):995–1002.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Steinberg SC, Faris RJ, Chang CF, Chan A, Tankersley MA. Impact of adherence to interferons in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a non-experimental, retrospective, cohort study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(2):89–100.CrossRefPubMed Steinberg SC, Faris RJ, Chang CF, Chan A, Tankersley MA. Impact of adherence to interferons in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a non-experimental, retrospective, cohort study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(2):89–100.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Limmroth V, Reischl J, Mann B, Morosov X, Kokoschka A, Weller I, et al. Autoinjector preference among patients with multiple sclerosis: results from a national survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1325–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Limmroth V, Reischl J, Mann B, Morosov X, Kokoschka A, Weller I, et al. Autoinjector preference among patients with multiple sclerosis: results from a national survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1325–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kivitz A, Cohen S, Dowd JE, et al. Clinical assessment of pain, tolerability, and preference of an autoinjection pen versus a prefilled syringe for patient self-administration of the fully human, monoclonal antibody adalimumab: the TOUCH trial. Clin Ther. 2006;28(10):1619–29.CrossRefPubMed Kivitz A, Cohen S, Dowd JE, et al. Clinical assessment of pain, tolerability, and preference of an autoinjection pen versus a prefilled syringe for patient self-administration of the fully human, monoclonal antibody adalimumab: the TOUCH trial. Clin Ther. 2006;28(10):1619–29.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Demary W, Schwenke H, Rockwitz K, et al. Subcutaneously administered methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis, by prefilled syringes versus prefilled pens: patient preference and comparison of the self-injection experience. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:1061–71.PubMedPubMedCentral Demary W, Schwenke H, Rockwitz K, et al. Subcutaneously administered methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis, by prefilled syringes versus prefilled pens: patient preference and comparison of the self-injection experience. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:1061–71.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Borrás-Blasco J, Gracia-Pérez A, Rosique-Robles JD, Casterá MD, Abad FJ. Acceptability of switching adalimumab from a prefilled syringe to an autoinjection pen. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10(3):301–7.CrossRefPubMed Borrás-Blasco J, Gracia-Pérez A, Rosique-Robles JD, Casterá MD, Abad FJ. Acceptability of switching adalimumab from a prefilled syringe to an autoinjection pen. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10(3):301–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tischer B, Mehl A. Patients’ and nurses’ preferences for autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: results of a European survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:1413–24. Tischer B, Mehl A. Patients’ and nurses’ preferences for autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: results of a European survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:1413–24.
23.
go back to reference Robitzsch A. Why ordinal variables can (almost) always be treated as continuous variables: clarifying assumptions of robust continuous and ordinal factor analysis estimation methods. Front Educ. 2020;5: 589965.CrossRef Robitzsch A. Why ordinal variables can (almost) always be treated as continuous variables: clarifying assumptions of robust continuous and ordinal factor analysis estimation methods. Front Educ. 2020;5: 589965.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Morgan NA, Rego LL. The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting business performance. Mark Sci. 2006;25(5):426–39.CrossRef Morgan NA, Rego LL. The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting business performance. Mark Sci. 2006;25(5):426–39.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Indovina KA, Keniston A, Manchala V, Burden M. Predictors of a top-box patient experience: a retrospective observational study of HCAHPS data at a safety net institution. Journal of Patient Experience. 2021;26(8):23743735211034344. Indovina KA, Keniston A, Manchala V, Burden M. Predictors of a top-box patient experience: a retrospective observational study of HCAHPS data at a safety net institution. Journal of Patient Experience. 2021;26(8):23743735211034344.
26.
go back to reference Thakur K, Biberger A, Handrich A, Rezk MF. Perceptions and preferences of two etanercept autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: a new European union-approved etanercept biosimilar (Benepali) versus etanercept (Enbrel) – findings from a nurse survey in Europe. Rheumatol Ther. 2016;3(1):77–89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thakur K, Biberger A, Handrich A, Rezk MF. Perceptions and preferences of two etanercept autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: a new European union-approved etanercept biosimilar (Benepali) versus etanercept (Enbrel) – findings from a nurse survey in Europe. Rheumatol Ther. 2016;3(1):77–89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Thakur K, Biberger A, Handrich A, Rezk MF. Patient perceptions and preferences of two etanercept autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: findings from a patient survey in Europe. Rheumatol Ther. 2016;3(2):245–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thakur K, Biberger A, Handrich A, Rezk MF. Patient perceptions and preferences of two etanercept autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: findings from a patient survey in Europe. Rheumatol Ther. 2016;3(2):245–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Patient and nurse preference for Sensoready autoinjector pen versus other autoinjectors in multiple sclerosis: results from a pilot multicenter survey
Authors
Amy Perrin Ross
Christian Besser
Shubhanvita Naval
Dee Stoneman
Harriet Gaunt
Noreen Barker
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03100-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Neurology 1/2023 Go to the issue