Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 5/2024

Open Access 30-01-2024 | Multiple Sclerosis | Original Communication

Isolated cognitive impairment in people with multiple sclerosis: frequency, MRI patterns and its development over time

Authors: Piet M. Bouman, Maureen A. van Dam, Laura E. Jonkman, Martijn D. Steenwijk, Menno M. Schoonheim, Jeroen J. G. Geurts, Hanneke E. Hulst

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To study the frequency of isolated (i.e., single-domain) cognitive impairments, domain specific MRI correlates, and its longitudinal development in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

Methods

348 PwMS (mean age 48 ± 11 years, 67% female, 244RR/52SP/38PP) underwent neuropsychological testing (extended BRB-N) at baseline and at five-year follow-up. At baseline, structural MRI was acquired. Isolated cognitive impairment was defined as a Z-score of at least 1.5 SD below normative data in one domain only (processing speed, memory, executive functioning/working memory, and attention). Multi-domain cognitive impairment was defined as being affected in ≥ 2 domains, and cognitively preserved otherwise. For PwMS with isolated cognitive impairment, MRI correlates were explored using linear regression. Development of isolated cognitive impairment over time was evaluated based on reliable change index.

Results

At baseline, 108 (31%) PwMS displayed isolated cognitive impairment, 148 (43%) PwMS displayed multi-domain cognitive impairment. Most PwMS with isolated cognitive impairment were impaired on executive functioning/working memory (EF/WM; N = 37), followed by processing speed (IPS; N = 25), memory (N = 23), and attention (N = 23). Isolated IPS impairment was explained by a model of cortical volume and fractional anisotropy (adj. R2 = 0.539, p < 0.001); memory by a model with cortical volume and hippocampal volume (adj. R2 = 0.493, p = 0.002); EF/WM and attention were not associated with any MRI measure. At follow-up, cognitive decline was present in 11/16 (69%) of PwMS with isolated IPS impairment at baseline. This percentage varied between 18 and 31% of PwMS with isolated cognitive impairment in domains other than IPS at baseline.

Conclusion

Isolated cognitive impairment is frequently present in PwMS and can serve as a proxy for further decline, particularly when it concerns processing speed. Cortical and deep grey matter atrophy seem to play a pivotal role in isolated cognitive impairment. Timely detection and patient-tailored intervention, predominantly for IPS, may help to postpone further cognitive decline.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benedict R, Amato MP, DeLuca J, Geurts JJG (2020) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues. Lancet Neurol 19(10):860–871PubMedPubMedCentral Benedict R, Amato MP, DeLuca J, Geurts JJG (2020) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues. Lancet Neurol 19(10):860–871PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Kalb R et al (2018) Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler 24(13):1665–1680PubMedPubMedCentral Kalb R et al (2018) Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler 24(13):1665–1680PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Sumowski JF et al (2018) Cognition in multiple sclerosis: State of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology 90(6):278–288PubMedPubMedCentral Sumowski JF et al (2018) Cognition in multiple sclerosis: State of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology 90(6):278–288PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Wojcik C et al (2022) Staging and stratifying cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 28(3):463–471PubMed Wojcik C et al (2022) Staging and stratifying cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 28(3):463–471PubMed
5.
go back to reference Calabrese M et al (2009) Cortical lesions and atrophy associated with cognitive impairment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 66(9):1144–1150PubMed Calabrese M et al (2009) Cortical lesions and atrophy associated with cognitive impairment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 66(9):1144–1150PubMed
6.
go back to reference Curti E et al (2018) Correlation between cortical lesions and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav 8(6):e00955PubMedPubMedCentral Curti E et al (2018) Correlation between cortical lesions and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav 8(6):e00955PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Daams M et al (2016) Multi-parametric structural magnetic resonance imaging in relation to cognitive dysfunction in long-standing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 22(5):608–619PubMed Daams M et al (2016) Multi-parametric structural magnetic resonance imaging in relation to cognitive dysfunction in long-standing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 22(5):608–619PubMed
8.
go back to reference Eijlers AJC et al (2018) Predicting cognitive decline in multiple sclerosis: a 5-year follow-up study. Brain 141(9):2605–2618PubMed Eijlers AJC et al (2018) Predicting cognitive decline in multiple sclerosis: a 5-year follow-up study. Brain 141(9):2605–2618PubMed
9.
go back to reference Benedict RH, Zivadinov R (2011) Risk factors for and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 7:332–342PubMed Benedict RH, Zivadinov R (2011) Risk factors for and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 7:332–342PubMed
10.
go back to reference Damasceno A, Pimentel-Silva LR, Damasceno BP, Cendes F (2020) Cognitive trajectories in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal 6-year study. Mult Scler 26(13):1740–1751PubMed Damasceno A, Pimentel-Silva LR, Damasceno BP, Cendes F (2020) Cognitive trajectories in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal 6-year study. Mult Scler 26(13):1740–1751PubMed
11.
go back to reference Polman CH et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302PubMedPubMedCentral Polman CH et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Steenwijk MD et al (2014) What explains gray matter atrophy in long-standing multiple sclerosis? Radiology 272(3):832–842PubMed Steenwijk MD et al (2014) What explains gray matter atrophy in long-standing multiple sclerosis? Radiology 272(3):832–842PubMed
13.
go back to reference Schoonheim MM et al (2015) Thalamus structure and function determine severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 84(8):776–783PubMed Schoonheim MM et al (2015) Thalamus structure and function determine severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 84(8):776–783PubMed
14.
go back to reference Eijlers AJC et al (2018) Determinants of cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis with and without atrophy. Radiology 288(2):544–551PubMed Eijlers AJC et al (2018) Determinants of cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis with and without atrophy. Radiology 288(2):544–551PubMed
15.
go back to reference Eijlers AJC et al (2017) Increased default-mode network centrality in cognitively impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology 88:952–960PubMed Eijlers AJC et al (2017) Increased default-mode network centrality in cognitively impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology 88:952–960PubMed
16.
go back to reference Meijer KA et al (2017) Increased connectivity of hub networks and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 88:2107–2114PubMed Meijer KA et al (2017) Increased connectivity of hub networks and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 88:2107–2114PubMed
17.
go back to reference Verhage F (1964) Intelligentie En Leeftijd: Onderzoek bij Nederlanders Van Twaalf Tot Zevenenzeventig Jaar. Van Gorcum, Assen Verhage F (1964) Intelligentie En Leeftijd: Onderzoek bij Nederlanders Van Twaalf Tot Zevenenzeventig Jaar. Van Gorcum, Assen
18.
go back to reference Kurtzke JF (1983) An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452PubMed Kurtzke JF (1983) An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452PubMed
19.
go back to reference Rao SM (1990) A manual for the brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Rao SM (1990) A manual for the brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
20.
go back to reference Buschke H (1973) Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 12:543–550 Buschke H (1973) Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 12:543–550
21.
go back to reference Smith A (1982) The symbol digits modalities test manual, revised. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles Smith A (1982) The symbol digits modalities test manual, revised. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles
22.
go back to reference Stroop JR (1992) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol Gen 121:15–23 Stroop JR (1992) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol Gen 121:15–23
23.
go back to reference Kane MJ, Engle RW (2003) Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J Exp Psychol Gen 132(1):47–70PubMed Kane MJ, Engle RW (2003) Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J Exp Psychol Gen 132(1):47–70PubMed
24.
go back to reference Brueggemann P et al (2021) On the relationship between tinnitus distress, cognitive performance and aging. Prog Brain Res 262:263–285PubMed Brueggemann P et al (2021) On the relationship between tinnitus distress, cognitive performance and aging. Prog Brain Res 262:263–285PubMed
25.
go back to reference Jensen AR, Rohwer WD Jr (1966) The Stroop color-word test: a review. Acta Psychol (Amst) 25(1):36–93PubMed Jensen AR, Rohwer WD Jr (1966) The Stroop color-word test: a review. Acta Psychol (Amst) 25(1):36–93PubMed
26.
go back to reference Van der Elst W, Van Boxtel MP, Breukelen GJ, Jolles J (2006) The concept shifting test: adult normative data. Psychol Assess 18:424–432PubMed Van der Elst W, Van Boxtel MP, Breukelen GJ, Jolles J (2006) The concept shifting test: adult normative data. Psychol Assess 18:424–432PubMed
27.
go back to reference Brand N, Jolles J (1987) Information processing in depression and anxiety. Psychol Med 17:263–267 Brand N, Jolles J (1987) Information processing in depression and anxiety. Psychol Med 17:263–267
28.
go back to reference Benedict R (2009) Standards for sample composition and impairment classification in neuropsychological studies of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 15(7):777–778PubMed Benedict R (2009) Standards for sample composition and impairment classification in neuropsychological studies of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 15(7):777–778PubMed
29.
go back to reference Fischer M et al (2014) How reliable is the classification of cognitive impairment across different criteria in early and late stages of multiple sclerosis? J Neurol Sci 343(1–2):91–99PubMed Fischer M et al (2014) How reliable is the classification of cognitive impairment across different criteria in early and late stages of multiple sclerosis? J Neurol Sci 343(1–2):91–99PubMed
31.
go back to reference Patenaude B, Smith SM, Kennedy DN, Jenkinson M (2011) A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 56(3):907–922PubMed Patenaude B, Smith SM, Kennedy DN, Jenkinson M (2011) A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 56(3):907–922PubMed
32.
go back to reference Smith SM et al (2002) Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage 17(1):479–489PubMed Smith SM et al (2002) Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage 17(1):479–489PubMed
33.
go back to reference Geurts JJG et al (2011) Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion detection scoring using double inversion recovery MRI. Neurology 76(5):418–424PubMed Geurts JJG et al (2011) Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion detection scoring using double inversion recovery MRI. Neurology 76(5):418–424PubMed
34.
go back to reference Podda J et al (2021) Predominant cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis: Insights from patient-centered outcomes. Mult Scler Relat Disord 51:102919PubMed Podda J et al (2021) Predominant cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis: Insights from patient-centered outcomes. Mult Scler Relat Disord 51:102919PubMed
35.
go back to reference De Meo E et al (2021) Identifying the distinct cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 78(4):414–425PubMed De Meo E et al (2021) Identifying the distinct cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 78(4):414–425PubMed
36.
go back to reference Schoonheim MM et al (2014) Sex-specific extent and severity of white matter damage in multiple sclerosis: implications for cognitive decline. Hum Brain Mapp 35(5):2348–2358PubMed Schoonheim MM et al (2014) Sex-specific extent and severity of white matter damage in multiple sclerosis: implications for cognitive decline. Hum Brain Mapp 35(5):2348–2358PubMed
37.
go back to reference Rocca MA et al (2018) The hippocampus in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 17(10):918–926PubMed Rocca MA et al (2018) The hippocampus in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 17(10):918–926PubMed
38.
go back to reference Sacco R et al (2015) Cognitive impairment and memory disorders in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: the role of white matter, gray matter and hippocampus. J Neurol 262(7):1691–1697PubMed Sacco R et al (2015) Cognitive impairment and memory disorders in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: the role of white matter, gray matter and hippocampus. J Neurol 262(7):1691–1697PubMed
39.
go back to reference Tremblay A et al (2018) Thalamic and hippocampal volume associated with memory functions in multiple sclerosis. Brain Cogn 125:61–68PubMed Tremblay A et al (2018) Thalamic and hippocampal volume associated with memory functions in multiple sclerosis. Brain Cogn 125:61–68PubMed
40.
go back to reference Faria CA, Alves HVD, Charchat-Fichman H (2015) The most frequently used tests for assessing executive functions in aging. Dement Neuropsychol 9(2):149–155PubMedPubMedCentral Faria CA, Alves HVD, Charchat-Fichman H (2015) The most frequently used tests for assessing executive functions in aging. Dement Neuropsychol 9(2):149–155PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Marchesi O et al (2022) Functional and structural MRI correlates of executive functions in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 28(5):742–756PubMed Marchesi O et al (2022) Functional and structural MRI correlates of executive functions in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 28(5):742–756PubMed
42.
go back to reference Bryan J, Luszcz MA (2000) Measurement of executive function: considerations for detecting adult age differences. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 22(1):40–55PubMed Bryan J, Luszcz MA (2000) Measurement of executive function: considerations for detecting adult age differences. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 22(1):40–55PubMed
43.
go back to reference Bergsland N et al (2016) Localized atrophy of the thalamus and slowed cognitive processing speed in MS patients. Mult Scler 22(10):1327–1336PubMed Bergsland N et al (2016) Localized atrophy of the thalamus and slowed cognitive processing speed in MS patients. Mult Scler 22(10):1327–1336PubMed
44.
go back to reference Carotenuto A et al (2022) Cognitive trajectories in multiple sclerosis: a long-term follow-up study. Neurol Sci 43(2):1215–1222PubMed Carotenuto A et al (2022) Cognitive trajectories in multiple sclerosis: a long-term follow-up study. Neurol Sci 43(2):1215–1222PubMed
45.
go back to reference Colato E et al (2021) Predicting disability progression and cognitive worsening in multiple sclerosis using patterns of grey matter volumes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 92(9):995–1006PubMed Colato E et al (2021) Predicting disability progression and cognitive worsening in multiple sclerosis using patterns of grey matter volumes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 92(9):995–1006PubMed
46.
go back to reference Sandry J et al (2021) The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is sensitive but non-specific in MS: lexical access speed, memory, and information processing speed independently contribute to SDMT performance. Mult Scler Relat Disord 51:102950PubMed Sandry J et al (2021) The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is sensitive but non-specific in MS: lexical access speed, memory, and information processing speed independently contribute to SDMT performance. Mult Scler Relat Disord 51:102950PubMed
47.
go back to reference Van Schependom J et al (2014) The Symbol Digit Modalities Test as sentinel test for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 21(9):1219–1225 (e71–2)PubMed Van Schependom J et al (2014) The Symbol Digit Modalities Test as sentinel test for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 21(9):1219–1225 (e71–2)PubMed
49.
go back to reference Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J (2008) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 7:1139–1151PubMed Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J (2008) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 7:1139–1151PubMed
50.
go back to reference Langdon DW et al (2012) Recommendations for a brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Mult Scler 18(6):891–898PubMedPubMedCentral Langdon DW et al (2012) Recommendations for a brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Mult Scler 18(6):891–898PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Gromisch ES, Portnoy JG, Foley FW (2018) Comparison of the abbreviated minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (aMACFIMS) and the brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). J Neurol Sci 388:70–75PubMed Gromisch ES, Portnoy JG, Foley FW (2018) Comparison of the abbreviated minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (aMACFIMS) and the brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). J Neurol Sci 388:70–75PubMed
52.
go back to reference van Dongen L et al (2020) Introducing multiple screener: an unsupervised digital screening tool for cognitive deficits in MS. Mult Scler Relat Disord 38:101479PubMed van Dongen L et al (2020) Introducing multiple screener: an unsupervised digital screening tool for cognitive deficits in MS. Mult Scler Relat Disord 38:101479PubMed
Metadata
Title
Isolated cognitive impairment in people with multiple sclerosis: frequency, MRI patterns and its development over time
Authors
Piet M. Bouman
Maureen A. van Dam
Laura E. Jonkman
Martijn D. Steenwijk
Menno M. Schoonheim
Jeroen J. G. Geurts
Hanneke E. Hulst
Publication date
30-01-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12185-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Journal of Neurology 5/2024 Go to the issue