Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurology and Therapy 2/2024

Open Access 12-02-2024 | Multiple Sclerosis | ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Understanding the Symptoms and Impacts Experienced by People with Relapsing–Remitting MS: A Qualitative Investigation Using Semi-Structured Interviews

Authors: Amy Barrett, Oyebimpe Olayinka-Amao, Tjalf Ziemssen, Trishna Bharadia, Christian Henke, Paul Kamudoni

Published in: Neurology and Therapy | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disabling disease with unpredictable clinical manifestations. As clinical assessments may not fully capture the impact of MS on quality of life, they can be complemented by patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to provide a more comprehensive picture of MS disease state and impact. The objectives of this study were to explore the experiences of people with relapsing–remitting MS, including symptoms and impacts on daily life, and to provide a conceptual model of MS outcomes.

Methods

A literature review of studies that evaluated the experiences of people with MS was completed and combined with semi-structured concept elicitation interviews conducted with 14 people with relapsing–remitting MS in the USA.

Results

The average age of the 14 participants was 43.9 (range 25–64) years, most were White (78.6%) and female (78.6%), and the mean duration since diagnosis was 6.6 (2–10) years. The most bothersome symptoms identified included fatigue (n = 9), cognitive dysfunction (n = 5), mobility/difficulty with walking (n = 3), and vision problems (n = 3). The most commonly reported impacts on daily life were balance problems/instability (n = 13), work life/productivity (n = 12), difficulty walking (n = 11), daily activities/household chores (n = 11), and leisure activities (n = 10).

Conclusion

There was a high frequency of concepts associated with physical function, fatigue, and sensory-motor actions. A conceptual model was developed that captures the disease symptoms, impairments, and impacts identified in the interviews as well as known processes and symptoms identified in the literature search. This model underpins the appropriateness of PRO instruments, such as the PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a and PROMIS Physical Function (MS) 15a, which evaluate symptoms and impacts that matter most to people with MS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
4.
go back to reference Newland PK, Thomas FP, Riley M, Flick LH, Fearing A. The use of focus groups to characterize symptoms in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2012;44(6):351–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Newland PK, Thomas FP, Riley M, Flick LH, Fearing A. The use of focus groups to characterize symptoms in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2012;44(6):351–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kister I, Bacon TE, Chamot E, Salter AR, Cutter GR, Kalina JT, Herbert J. Natural history of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Int J MS Care. 2013;15(3):146–58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kister I, Bacon TE, Chamot E, Salter AR, Cutter GR, Kalina JT, Herbert J. Natural history of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Int J MS Care. 2013;15(3):146–58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barin L, Salmen A, Disanto G, et al. The disease burden of multiple sclerosis from the individual and population perspective: which symptoms matter most? Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;25:112–21.PubMedCrossRef Barin L, Salmen A, Disanto G, et al. The disease burden of multiple sclerosis from the individual and population perspective: which symptoms matter most? Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;25:112–21.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rommer PS, Eichstädt K, Ellenberger D, et al. Symptomatology and symptomatic treatment in multiple sclerosis: results from a nationwide MS registry. Mult Scler J. 2019;25(12):1641–52.CrossRef Rommer PS, Eichstädt K, Ellenberger D, et al. Symptomatology and symptomatic treatment in multiple sclerosis: results from a nationwide MS registry. Mult Scler J. 2019;25(12):1641–52.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Feys P, Giovannoni G, Dijsselbloem N, Centonze D, Eelen P, Lykke AS. The importance of a multi-disciplinary perspective and patient activation programmes in MS management. Mult Scler J. 2016;22(2_suppl):34–46.CrossRef Feys P, Giovannoni G, Dijsselbloem N, Centonze D, Eelen P, Lykke AS. The importance of a multi-disciplinary perspective and patient activation programmes in MS management. Mult Scler J. 2016;22(2_suppl):34–46.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kuhlmann T, Moccia M, Coetzee T, et al. Multiple sclerosis progression: time for a new mechanism-driven framework. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(1):78–88.PubMedCrossRef Kuhlmann T, Moccia M, Coetzee T, et al. Multiple sclerosis progression: time for a new mechanism-driven framework. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(1):78–88.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cagol A, Schaedelin S, Barakovic M, et al. Association of brain atrophy with disease progression independent of relapse activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(7):682–92.PubMedCrossRef Cagol A, Schaedelin S, Barakovic M, et al. Association of brain atrophy with disease progression independent of relapse activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(7):682–92.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Elliott C, Wolinsky JS, Hauser SL, et al. Slowly expanding/evolving lesions as a magnetic resonance imaging marker of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions. Mult Scler. 2019;25(14):1915–25.PubMedCrossRef Elliott C, Wolinsky JS, Hauser SL, et al. Slowly expanding/evolving lesions as a magnetic resonance imaging marker of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions. Mult Scler. 2019;25(14):1915–25.PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Sucksdorff M, Matilainen M, Tuisku J, et al. Brain TSPO-PET predicts later disease progression independent of relapses in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2020;143(11):3318–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sucksdorff M, Matilainen M, Tuisku J, et al. Brain TSPO-PET predicts later disease progression independent of relapses in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2020;143(11):3318–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, et al. Contribution of relapse-independent progression vs relapse-associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(9):1132–40.PubMedCrossRef Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, et al. Contribution of relapse-independent progression vs relapse-associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(9):1132–40.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Inojosa H, Proschmann U, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Should we use clinical tools to identify disease progression? Front Neurol. 2020;11:628542.PubMedCrossRef Inojosa H, Proschmann U, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Should we use clinical tools to identify disease progression? Front Neurol. 2020;11:628542.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Thrue C, Riemenschneider M, Hvid L, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Time matters: early-phase multiple sclerosis is accompanied by considerable impairments across multiple domains. Mult Scler J. 2021;27(10):1477–85.CrossRef Thrue C, Riemenschneider M, Hvid L, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Time matters: early-phase multiple sclerosis is accompanied by considerable impairments across multiple domains. Mult Scler J. 2021;27(10):1477–85.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mountford S, Kahn M, Balakrishnan P, et al. Correlation and differences of patient-reported outcomes vs. Likert-rating of MS symptoms in a real-world cohort using a digital patient app. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231173520.PubMedPubMedCentral Mountford S, Kahn M, Balakrishnan P, et al. Correlation and differences of patient-reported outcomes vs. Likert-rating of MS symptoms in a real-world cohort using a digital patient app. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231173520.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Khan F, Pallant JF. Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to describe patient-reported disability in multiple sclerosis and identification of relevant environmental factors. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(1):63–70.PubMedCrossRef Khan F, Pallant JF. Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to describe patient-reported disability in multiple sclerosis and identification of relevant environmental factors. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(1):63–70.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Newland PK, Lorenz R, Budhathoki C, Jensen MP. The presence of symptoms with comorbid conditions in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). Clin Nurs Res. 2016;25(5):532–48.PubMedCrossRef Newland PK, Lorenz R, Budhathoki C, Jensen MP. The presence of symptoms with comorbid conditions in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). Clin Nurs Res. 2016;25(5):532–48.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Taylor BV, Simpson S, et al. Feelings of depression, pain and walking difficulties have the largest impact on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis, irrespective of clinical phenotype. Mult Scler J. 2021;27(8):1262–75.CrossRef Zhang Y, Taylor BV, Simpson S, et al. Feelings of depression, pain and walking difficulties have the largest impact on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis, irrespective of clinical phenotype. Mult Scler J. 2021;27(8):1262–75.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurol. 1983;33(11):1444–52.CrossRef Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurol. 1983;33(11):1444–52.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162–73.PubMedCrossRef Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162–73.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Inojosa H, Schriefer D, Ziemssen T. Clinical outcome measures in multiple sclerosis: a review. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(5):102512.PubMedCrossRef Inojosa H, Schriefer D, Ziemssen T. Clinical outcome measures in multiple sclerosis: a review. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(5):102512.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference van’t Hullenaar CAA, Coerver E, Kalkers NF, et al. The use of multi-domain patient reported outcome measures for detecting clinical disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;55:103165.CrossRef van’t Hullenaar CAA, Coerver E, Kalkers NF, et al. The use of multi-domain patient reported outcome measures for detecting clinical disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;55:103165.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hudgens S, Schuler R, Stokes J, Eremenco S, Hunsche E, Leist TP. Development and validation of the FSIQ-RMS: a new patient-reported questionnaire to assess symptoms and impacts of fatigue in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Value Health. 2019;22(4):453–66.PubMedCrossRef Hudgens S, Schuler R, Stokes J, Eremenco S, Hunsche E, Leist TP. Development and validation of the FSIQ-RMS: a new patient-reported questionnaire to assess symptoms and impacts of fatigue in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Value Health. 2019;22(4):453–66.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kamudoni P, Johns J, Cook KF, et al. Standardizing fatigue measurement in multiple sclerosis: the validity, responsiveness and score interpretation of the PROMIS SF v1.0 Fatigue (MS) 8a. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;54:103117. Kamudoni P, Johns J, Cook KF, et al. Standardizing fatigue measurement in multiple sclerosis: the validity, responsiveness and score interpretation of the PROMIS SF v1.0 Fatigue (MS) 8a. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;54:103117.
28.
go back to reference Prakash RS, Schirda B, Valentine TR, Crotty M, Nicholas JA. Emotion dysregulation in multiple sclerosis: Impact on symptoms of depression and anxiety. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;36:101399. Prakash RS, Schirda B, Valentine TR, Crotty M, Nicholas JA. Emotion dysregulation in multiple sclerosis: Impact on symptoms of depression and anxiety. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;36:101399.
31.
go back to reference Zaratin P, Vermersch P, Amato MP, Brichetto G, Coetzee T, Cutter G, et al. The agenda of the global patient reported outcomes for multiple sclerosis (PROMS) initiative: Progresses and open questions. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;61: 103757.PubMedCrossRef Zaratin P, Vermersch P, Amato MP, Brichetto G, Coetzee T, Cutter G, et al. The agenda of the global patient reported outcomes for multiple sclerosis (PROMS) initiative: Progresses and open questions. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;61: 103757.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Scholz M, Haase R, Trentzsch K, Stölzer-Hutsch H, Ziemssen T. Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment. Brain Sci. 2021;11(6):786. Scholz M, Haase R, Trentzsch K, Stölzer-Hutsch H, Ziemssen T. Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment. Brain Sci. 2021;11(6):786.
33.
go back to reference Kamudoni P, Amtmann D, Johns J, et al. The validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation of the PROMISnq Physical Function Multiple Sclerosis 15a short form in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;62:103753. Kamudoni P, Amtmann D, Johns J, et al. The validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation of the PROMISnq Physical Function Multiple Sclerosis 15a short form in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;62:103753.
34.
go back to reference Cohen MZ, Phillips JM, Palos G. Qualitative research with diverse populations. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2001;17(3):190–6.PubMedCrossRef Cohen MZ, Phillips JM, Palos G. Qualitative research with diverse populations. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2001;17(3):190–6.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Mateen FJ. Is It Time for Quotas to Achieve Racial and Ethnic Representation in Multiple Sclerosis Trials? Front Neurol. 2021;12:680912. Mateen FJ. Is It Time for Quotas to Achieve Racial and Ethnic Representation in Multiple Sclerosis Trials? Front Neurol. 2021;12:680912.
36.
go back to reference Westergaard K, Skovgaard L, Magyari M, Kristiansen M. Patient perspectives on patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis treatment trajectories: A qualitative study of why, what, and how? Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;58:103475. Westergaard K, Skovgaard L, Magyari M, Kristiansen M. Patient perspectives on patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis treatment trajectories: A qualitative study of why, what, and how? Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;58:103475.
37.
go back to reference Matza LS, Stewart KD, Phillips G, Delio P, Naismith RT. Development of a brief clinician-reported outcome measure of multiple sclerosis signs and symptoms: the Clinician Rating of Multiple Sclerosis (CRoMS). Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;35:253–61.PubMedCrossRef Matza LS, Stewart KD, Phillips G, Delio P, Naismith RT. Development of a brief clinician-reported outcome measure of multiple sclerosis signs and symptoms: the Clinician Rating of Multiple Sclerosis (CRoMS). Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;35:253–61.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Larocca NG. Impact of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: perspectives of patients and care partners. Patient. 2011;4(3):189–201.PubMedCrossRef Larocca NG. Impact of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: perspectives of patients and care partners. Patient. 2011;4(3):189–201.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Campos-Lucas FJ, Fernández-Fernández Ó, Monge-Martín D, Moral-Torres E, Carrascal-Rueda P, Caballero-Martínez F. The evolution of multiple sclerosis in Spain over the last decade from the patient’s perspective. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;57: 103355.PubMedCrossRef Campos-Lucas FJ, Fernández-Fernández Ó, Monge-Martín D, Moral-Torres E, Carrascal-Rueda P, Caballero-Martínez F. The evolution of multiple sclerosis in Spain over the last decade from the patient’s perspective. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;57: 103355.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Harrison AM, Bogosian A, Silber E, McCracken LM, Moss-Morris R. “It feels like someone is hammering my feet”: understanding pain and its management from the perspective of people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(4):466–76.PubMedCrossRef Harrison AM, Bogosian A, Silber E, McCracken LM, Moss-Morris R. “It feels like someone is hammering my feet”: understanding pain and its management from the perspective of people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(4):466–76.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Maurino J, Martínez-Ginés ML, García-Domínguez JM, et al. Workplace difficulties, health-related quality of life, and perception of stigma from the perspective of patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;41:102046.PubMedCrossRef Maurino J, Martínez-Ginés ML, García-Domínguez JM, et al. Workplace difficulties, health-related quality of life, and perception of stigma from the perspective of patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;41:102046.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Krokavcova M, Van Dijk JP, Nagyova I, et al. Perceived health status as measured by the SF-36 in patients with multiple sclerosis: a review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009;23(3):529–38.PubMedCrossRef Krokavcova M, Van Dijk JP, Nagyova I, et al. Perceived health status as measured by the SF-36 in patients with multiple sclerosis: a review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009;23(3):529–38.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference D’Amico E, Haase R, Ziemssen T. Review: Patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;33:61–6.PubMedCrossRef D’Amico E, Haase R, Ziemssen T. Review: Patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;33:61–6.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Benedict RH, DeLuca J, Phillips G, LaRocca N, Hudson LD, Rudick R. Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(5):721–33.CrossRef Benedict RH, DeLuca J, Phillips G, LaRocca N, Hudson LD, Rudick R. Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(5):721–33.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Motl RW, Weikert M, Suh Y, et al. Accuracy of the actibelt® accelerometer for measuring walking speed in a controlled environment among persons with multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture. 2012;35(2):192–6.PubMedCrossRef Motl RW, Weikert M, Suh Y, et al. Accuracy of the actibelt® accelerometer for measuring walking speed in a controlled environment among persons with multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture. 2012;35(2):192–6.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ziemssen T. Symptom management in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2011;311(Suppl 1):S48–52.PubMedCrossRef Ziemssen T. Symptom management in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2011;311(Suppl 1):S48–52.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Voigt I, Inojosa H, Wenk J, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Building a monitoring matrix for the management of multiple sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2023;22(8):103358.PubMedCrossRef Voigt I, Inojosa H, Wenk J, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Building a monitoring matrix for the management of multiple sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2023;22(8):103358.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Cadavid D, Cohen JA, Freedman MS, et al. The EDSS-Plus, an improved endpoint for disability progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(1):94–105.CrossRef Cadavid D, Cohen JA, Freedman MS, et al. The EDSS-Plus, an improved endpoint for disability progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(1):94–105.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Ziemssen T, Tolley C, Bennett B, et al. A mixed methods approach towards understanding key disease characteristics associated with the progression from RRMS to SPMS: physicians’ and patients’ views. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;38:101861.PubMedCrossRef Ziemssen T, Tolley C, Bennett B, et al. A mixed methods approach towards understanding key disease characteristics associated with the progression from RRMS to SPMS: physicians’ and patients’ views. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;38:101861.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Bharadia T, Vandercappellen J, Chitnis T, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in MS: do development processes and patient involvement support valid quantification of clinically important variables? Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022;8(2):20552173221105640.PubMedPubMedCentral Bharadia T, Vandercappellen J, Chitnis T, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in MS: do development processes and patient involvement support valid quantification of clinically important variables? Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022;8(2):20552173221105640.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Understanding the Symptoms and Impacts Experienced by People with Relapsing–Remitting MS: A Qualitative Investigation Using Semi-Structured Interviews
Authors
Amy Barrett
Oyebimpe Olayinka-Amao
Tjalf Ziemssen
Trishna Bharadia
Christian Henke
Paul Kamudoni
Publication date
12-02-2024
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Neurology and Therapy / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 2193-8253
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00584-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Neurology and Therapy 2/2024 Go to the issue