Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Multiple Sclerosis | Original Communication

Factors influencing patient satisfaction with the first diagnostic consultation in multiple sclerosis: a Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR) study

Authors: Christian Philipp Kamm, L. Barin, C. Gobbi, C. Pot, P. Calabrese, A. Salmen, L. Achtnichts, J. Kesselring, M. A. Puhan, V. von Wyl, For the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR)

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient satisfaction is predictive of adherence, malpractice litigation and doctor-switching.

Objective

To investigate which factors of the first diagnostic consultation (FDC) influence patient satisfaction and which topics persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) thought were missing.

Methods

Using retrospective patient-reported data of the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry from PwMS with relapsing disease onset, we fitted ordered logistic regression models on satisfaction with FDC, with socio-demographic and FDC features as explanatory factors.

Results

386 PwMS diagnosed after 1995 were included. Good satisfaction with the FDC was associated with a conversation more than 20 min [multivariable odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 3.9 (2.42; 6.27)], covering many topics [1.35 (1.19; 1.54) per additional topic], the presence of a significant others [1.74 (1.03; 2.94) ], and shared decision making [3.39 (1.74; 6.59)]. Not receiving a specific diagnosis was main driver for low satisfaction [0.29 (0.15; 0.55)]. Main missing topics concerned long-term consequences (reported by 6.7%), psychological aspects (6.2%) and how to obtain support and further information (5.2%).

Conclusions

A conversation of more than 20 min covering many MS relevant topics, a clear communication of the diagnosis, the presence of a close relative or significant other, as well as shared decision making enhanced patient satisfaction with the FDC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02980640
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Davies AR (1983) Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care. Eval Progr Plan 6:291–297CrossRef Ware JE Jr, Davies AR (1983) Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care. Eval Progr Plan 6:291–297CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Becker MH, Malman LA (1980) Strategies for enhancing patient compliance. J Community Health 6:113–135CrossRef Becker MH, Malman LA (1980) Strategies for enhancing patient compliance. J Community Health 6:113–135CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Marquis MS, Davies AR, Ware JE Jr (1983) Patient satisfaction and change in medical care provider: a longitudinal study. Med Care 21:821–829CrossRef Marquis MS, Davies AR, Ware JE Jr (1983) Patient satisfaction and change in medical care provider: a longitudinal study. Med Care 21:821–829CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Miller RH, Williams PC, Napolitana G, Schmied J (1990) Malpractice: a case–control study of claimants. J Gen Intern Med 5:244–248CrossRef Miller RH, Williams PC, Napolitana G, Schmied J (1990) Malpractice: a case–control study of claimants. J Gen Intern Med 5:244–248CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S (2012) Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 366:780–781CrossRef Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S (2012) Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 366:780–781CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–692CrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–692CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kamm CP, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH (2014) Multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future outlook. Eur Neurol 72:132–141CrossRef Kamm CP, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH (2014) Multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future outlook. Eur Neurol 72:132–141CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Solari A, Acquarone N, Pucci E et al (2007) Communicating the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis—a qualitative study. Mult Scler 13:763–769CrossRef Solari A, Acquarone N, Pucci E et al (2007) Communicating the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis—a qualitative study. Mult Scler 13:763–769CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Janssens AC, van Doorn PA, de Boer JB, van der Meché FG, Passchier J, Hintzen R (2003) Impact of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis on quality of life, anxiety, depression and distress of patients and partners. Acta Neurol Scand 108:389–395CrossRef Janssens AC, van Doorn PA, de Boer JB, van der Meché FG, Passchier J, Hintzen R (2003) Impact of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis on quality of life, anxiety, depression and distress of patients and partners. Acta Neurol Scand 108:389–395CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Solari A (2014) Effective communication at the point of multiple sclerosis diagnosis. Mult Scler 20:397–402CrossRef Solari A (2014) Effective communication at the point of multiple sclerosis diagnosis. Mult Scler 20:397–402CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Giordano A, Lugaresi A, Confalonieri P et al (2014) Implementation of the ‘Sapere Migliora’ information aid for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis in routine clinical practice: a late-phase controlled trial. Mult Scler 20:1234–1243CrossRef Giordano A, Lugaresi A, Confalonieri P et al (2014) Implementation of the ‘Sapere Migliora’ information aid for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis in routine clinical practice: a late-phase controlled trial. Mult Scler 20:1234–1243CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Papathanasopoulos PG, Nikolakopoulou A, Scolding NJ (2005) Disclosing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 252:1307–1309CrossRef Papathanasopoulos PG, Nikolakopoulou A, Scolding NJ (2005) Disclosing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 252:1307–1309CrossRef
14.
go back to reference O'Connor P, Detsky AS, Tansey C, Kucharczyk W (1994) Effect of diagnostic testing for multiple sclerosis on patient health perceptions. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group. Arch Neurol 51:46–51CrossRef O'Connor P, Detsky AS, Tansey C, Kucharczyk W (1994) Effect of diagnostic testing for multiple sclerosis on patient health perceptions. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group. Arch Neurol 51:46–51CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Solari A, Martinelli V, Trojano M et al (2010) An information aid for newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients improves disease knowledge and satisfaction with care. Mult Scler 16:1393–1405CrossRef Solari A, Martinelli V, Trojano M et al (2010) An information aid for newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients improves disease knowledge and satisfaction with care. Mult Scler 16:1393–1405CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R (2010) Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 341:c5146CrossRef Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R (2010) Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 341:c5146CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Puhan MA, Steinemann N, Kamm CP et al (2018) A digitally facilitated citizen-science driven approach accelerates participant recruitment and increases study population diversity. Swiss Med Wkly 148:w14623PubMed Puhan MA, Steinemann N, Kamm CP et al (2018) A digitally facilitated citizen-science driven approach accelerates participant recruitment and increases study population diversity. Swiss Med Wkly 148:w14623PubMed
18.
go back to reference Steinemann N, Kuhle J, Calabrese P et al (2018) The Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR): study protocol of a participatory, nationwide registry to promote epidemiological and patient-centered MS research. BMC Neurol 18:111CrossRef Steinemann N, Kuhle J, Calabrese P et al (2018) The Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR): study protocol of a participatory, nationwide registry to promote epidemiological and patient-centered MS research. BMC Neurol 18:111CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Barin L, Salmen A, Disanto G et al (2018) The disease burden of Multiple Sclerosis from the individual and population perspective: which symptoms matter most? Mult Scler Relat Disord 25:112–121CrossRef Barin L, Salmen A, Disanto G et al (2018) The disease burden of Multiple Sclerosis from the individual and population perspective: which symptoms matter most? Mult Scler Relat Disord 25:112–121CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ben-Zacharia A, Adamson M, Boyd A et al (2018) Impact of shared decision making on disease-modifying drug adherence in multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care 20:287–297CrossRef Ben-Zacharia A, Adamson M, Boyd A et al (2018) Impact of shared decision making on disease-modifying drug adherence in multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care 20:287–297CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brown H, Gabriele S, White J (2018) Physician and patient treatment decision-making in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Europe and the USA. Neurodegener Dis Manag 8:371–376CrossRef Brown H, Gabriele S, White J (2018) Physician and patient treatment decision-making in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Europe and the USA. Neurodegener Dis Manag 8:371–376CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sherlock A, Brownie S (2014) Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg 84:207–210CrossRef Sherlock A, Brownie S (2014) Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg 84:207–210CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G et al (2017) Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 376:221–234CrossRef Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G et al (2017) Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 376:221–234CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L et al (2017) Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 376:209–220CrossRef Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L et al (2017) Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 376:209–220CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL et al (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1098–1107 (Erratum in: N Engl J Med 367: 2362) CrossRef Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL et al (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1098–1107 (Erratum in: N Engl J Med 367: 2362) CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors influencing patient satisfaction with the first diagnostic consultation in multiple sclerosis: a Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR) study
Authors
Christian Philipp Kamm
L. Barin
C. Gobbi
C. Pot
P. Calabrese
A. Salmen
L. Achtnichts
J. Kesselring
M. A. Puhan
V. von Wyl
For the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR)
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09563-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Neurology 1/2020 Go to the issue