Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Multiple Myeloma | Study protocol

The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor

Authors: Samantha Hinsley, Katrina Walker, Debbie Sherratt, Lucy Bailey, Sadie Reed, Louise Flanagan, Sophie McKee, Fiona Brudenell Straw, Bryony Dawkins, David Meads, Holger W. Auner, Martin F. Kaiser, Mark Cook, Sarah Brown, Gordon Cook, on behalf of the Myeloma UK Clinical Trials Network

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell tumour with approximately 5500 new cases in the UK each year. Ixazomib is a next generation inhibitor of the 20S proteasome and is thought to be an effective treatment for those who have relapsed from bortezomib. The combination of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CD) is a recognised treatment option for patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have relapsed after treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide, whilst also often being combined with newer proteasome inhibitors. The most apparent combination for ixazomib is therefore with CD.

Methods

MUK eight is a randomised, controlled, open, parallel group, multi-centre phase II trial that will recruit patients with RRMM who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide, and a proteasome inhibitor. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate whether ixazomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (ICD) has improved clinical activity compared to CD in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include comparing toxicity profiles and the activity and cost-effectiveness of both treatments. Since opening, the trial has been amended to allow all participants who experience disease progression (as per the IMWG criteria) on the CD arm to subsequently switch to receive ICD treatment, once progression has been confirmed with two clinical members of the Trial Management Group (TMG). This ‘switch’ phase of the study is exploratory and will assess second progression-free survival measured from randomisation to second disease progression (PFS2) and progression-free survival from the point of switching to second disease progression (PFS Switch) in participants who switch from CD to ICD treatment.

Discussion

Development of ixazomib offers the opportunity to further investigate the value of proteasome inhibition through oral administration in the treatment of RRMM. Previous studies investigating the safety and efficacy of ICD in patients with RRMM demonstrate a toxicity profile consistent with ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, whilst the combination showed possible activity in RRMM patients. Further investigation of the anti-tumour effect of this drug in RRMM patients is therefore warranted, especially since no trials comparing CD with ICD have been completed at present.

Trial registration

ISRCTN number: ISRCTN58227268. Registered on 26 August 2015.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kouroukis TC, et al. Bortezomib in multiple myeloma: systematic review and clinical considerations. Curr Oncol. 2014;21(4):e573–603.CrossRef Kouroukis TC, et al. Bortezomib in multiple myeloma: systematic review and clinical considerations. Curr Oncol. 2014;21(4):e573–603.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Richardson PG, et al. Phase 1 study of twice-weekly ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2014;124(7):1038–46.CrossRef Richardson PG, et al. Phase 1 study of twice-weekly ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2014;124(7):1038–46.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chauhan D, et al. In vitro and in vivo selective antitumor activity of a novel orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 against multiple myeloma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(16):5311–21.CrossRef Chauhan D, et al. In vitro and in vivo selective antitumor activity of a novel orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 against multiple myeloma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(16):5311–21.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kumar SK, et al. Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014;124(7):1047–55.CrossRef Kumar SK, et al. Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014;124(7):1047–55.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nooka AK, et al. Treatment options for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015;125(20):3085–99.CrossRef Nooka AK, et al. Treatment options for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015;125(20):3085–99.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brown SR, et al. Experiences of establishing an academic early phase clinical trials unit. Clinical Trials. 2017;14(4):349–56.CrossRef Brown SR, et al. Experiences of establishing an academic early phase clinical trials unit. Clinical Trials. 2017;14(4):349–56.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Richardson PG, et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2487–98.CrossRef Richardson PG, et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2487–98.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dimopoulos MA, et al. Pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone: demonstrates a asignificant progression free survival and overall survival advantage, in Relapsed/Refractory MM: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study. Blood. 2012;120(21):LBA-6.CrossRef Dimopoulos MA, et al. Pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone: demonstrates a asignificant progression free survival and overall survival advantage, in Relapsed/Refractory MM: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study. Blood. 2012;120(21):LBA-6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lacy MQ, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in myeloma refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide: comparison of 2 dosing strategies in dual-refractory disease. Blood. 2011;118(11):2970–5.CrossRef Lacy MQ, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in myeloma refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide: comparison of 2 dosing strategies in dual-refractory disease. Blood. 2011;118(11):2970–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leleu X, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is active and well tolerated in bortezomib and lenalidomide–refractory multiple myeloma: Intergroupe xrjrncophone du Myélome 2009-02. Blood. 2013;121(11):1968–75.CrossRef Leleu X, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is active and well tolerated in bortezomib and lenalidomide–refractory multiple myeloma: Intergroupe xrjrncophone du Myélome 2009-02. Blood. 2013;121(11):1968–75.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Damaj G, et al. Results from a prospective, open-label, phase II trial of Bendamustine in refractory or relapsed T-cell lymphomas: the BENTLY trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(1):104–10.CrossRef Damaj G, et al. Results from a prospective, open-label, phase II trial of Bendamustine in refractory or relapsed T-cell lymphomas: the BENTLY trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(1):104–10.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979;35(3):549–56.CrossRef O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979;35(3):549–56.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Checking the cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals. Biometrika. 1993;80(3):557–72.CrossRef Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Checking the cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals. Biometrika. 1993;80(3):557–72.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Charlson ME, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.CrossRef Charlson ME, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Moreau P. Oral therapy for multiple myeloma: ixazomib arriving soon. Blood. 2014;124(7):986–7.CrossRef Moreau P. Oral therapy for multiple myeloma: ixazomib arriving soon. Blood. 2014;124(7):986–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kumar S, et al. Phase 2 study of the all-Oral combination of Ixazomib plus cyclophosphamide and low-dose dexamethasone (ICd) in patients (Pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 2016;128(22):3327.CrossRef Kumar S, et al. Phase 2 study of the all-Oral combination of Ixazomib plus cyclophosphamide and low-dose dexamethasone (ICd) in patients (Pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 2016;128(22):3327.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor
Authors
Samantha Hinsley
Katrina Walker
Debbie Sherratt
Lucy Bailey
Sadie Reed
Louise Flanagan
Sophie McKee
Fiona Brudenell Straw
Bryony Dawkins
David Meads
Holger W. Auner
Martin F. Kaiser
Mark Cook
Sarah Brown
Gordon Cook
on behalf of the Myeloma UK Clinical Trials Network
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04739-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Trials 1/2020 Go to the issue