Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Original Article

Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system

Authors: Mitesh Parekh, Steven Swift, Nucelio Lemos, Mohsen Iskander, Bob Freeman, A. S. Arunkalaivanan, Alois Martan, Olanrewaju Sorinola, Diaa Rizk, Michael Halaska, Grzegorz Surkont, Carlos Medina, Jose Carlos Conceicao, Jeffrey E. Korte

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-examiner agreement of a previously described simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (S-POP) system in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded fashion. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system’s use in daily practice is hampered due to perceived complexity and difficulty of use. The S-POP was introduced in order to make the POPQ user-friendly and increase its usage (Swift et al. in Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615–620, 2006).

Methods

Five hundred eleven subjects underwent two separate pelvic exams in random order by two blinded examiners employing the S-POP at 12 centers around the world. Data were compared using weighted kappa statistics.

Results

The weighted kappa statistics for the inter-examiner reliability of the S-POP were 0.87 for the overall stage, 0.89 and 0.81 for the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, 0.82 for the apex/cuff 0.89, and 0.84 for the cervix and vaginal fornix, respectively.

Conclusion

There is an almost perfect inter-examiner agreement of the S-POP system for the overall stage and each point within the system.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Friedman EA, Little WA (1961) The conflict of nomenclature for descensus uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:817–820PubMed Friedman EA, Little WA (1961) The conflict of nomenclature for descensus uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:817–820PubMed
2.
go back to reference Porges RF (1963) A practical system of diagnosis and classification of pelvic relaxations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 117:761–773 Porges RF (1963) A practical system of diagnosis and classification of pelvic relaxations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 117:761–773
3.
go back to reference Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of pelvic relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15:1048–1054PubMedCrossRef Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of pelvic relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15:1048–1054PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brubaker L, Norton P (1996) Current clinical nomenclature for description of pelvic organ prolapse. J Pelvic Surg 2:257–259 Brubaker L, Norton P (1996) Current clinical nomenclature for description of pelvic organ prolapse. J Pelvic Surg 2:257–259
5.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancy JOL, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of the terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancy JOL, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of the terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW et al (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467PubMedCrossRef Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW et al (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kobak WH, Rosenberger K, Walters MD (1996) Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 7:121–124CrossRef Kobak WH, Rosenberger K, Walters MD (1996) Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 7:121–124CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Muir TW, Stepp KJ, Barber MD (2003) Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1632PubMedCrossRef Muir TW, Stepp KJ, Barber MD (2003) Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1632PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Visco AG, Wei JT, McClure LA, Handa VL, Nygaard IE (2003) Effects of examination technique modifications on pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) results. Int Urogynecol J 14:136–140CrossRef Visco AG, Wei JT, McClure LA, Handa VL, Nygaard IE (2003) Effects of examination technique modifications on pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) results. Int Urogynecol J 14:136–140CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Treszezamsky AD, Rascoff L, Shahryarinejad A, Vardy MD (2010) Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals. Int Urogyn J 21:359–363. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-1044-1 CrossRef Treszezamsky AD, Rascoff L, Shahryarinejad A, Vardy MD (2010) Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals. Int Urogyn J 21:359–363. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-009-1044-1 CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:324PubMed Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:324PubMed
12.
go back to reference Davila GW, Goniem GM, Kapoor DS, Contreras-Ortiz O (2002) Pelvic floor dysfunction management practice pattern: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13(5):319–325PubMedCrossRef Davila GW, Goniem GM, Kapoor DS, Contreras-Ortiz O (2002) Pelvic floor dysfunction management practice pattern: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13(5):319–325PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Swift SE, Morris S, McKinnie V (2006) Validation of a simplified technique for using the POP-Q pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615–620CrossRef Swift SE, Morris S, McKinnie V (2006) Validation of a simplified technique for using the POP-Q pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615–620CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for catagorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for catagorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Swift SE, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, Wang W, Wang W, Schaffer J (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST); the distribution, clinical definition and epidemiology of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806PubMedCrossRef Swift SE, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, Wang W, Wang W, Schaffer J (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST); the distribution, clinical definition and epidemiology of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Swift SE (2000) The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic healthcare. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:277–285PubMedCrossRef Swift SE (2000) The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic healthcare. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:277–285PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Swift SE, Tate SB, Nichols J (2003) Correlation of symptomology with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:372–9PubMedCrossRef Swift SE, Tate SB, Nichols J (2003) Correlation of symptomology with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:372–9PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system
Authors
Mitesh Parekh
Steven Swift
Nucelio Lemos
Mohsen Iskander
Bob Freeman
A. S. Arunkalaivanan
Alois Martan
Olanrewaju Sorinola
Diaa Rizk
Michael Halaska
Grzegorz Surkont
Carlos Medina
Jose Carlos Conceicao
Jeffrey E. Korte
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2011 Go to the issue