Published in:
01-06-2011 | Original Article
Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system
Authors:
Mitesh Parekh, Steven Swift, Nucelio Lemos, Mohsen Iskander, Bob Freeman, A. S. Arunkalaivanan, Alois Martan, Olanrewaju Sorinola, Diaa Rizk, Michael Halaska, Grzegorz Surkont, Carlos Medina, Jose Carlos Conceicao, Jeffrey E. Korte
Published in:
International Urogynecology Journal
|
Issue 6/2011
Login to get access
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-examiner agreement of a previously described simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (S-POP) system in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded fashion. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system’s use in daily practice is hampered due to perceived complexity and difficulty of use. The S-POP was introduced in order to make the POPQ user-friendly and increase its usage (Swift et al. in Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615–620,
2006).
Methods
Five hundred eleven subjects underwent two separate pelvic exams in random order by two blinded examiners employing the S-POP at 12 centers around the world. Data were compared using weighted kappa statistics.
Results
The weighted kappa statistics for the inter-examiner reliability of the S-POP were 0.87 for the overall stage, 0.89 and 0.81 for the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, 0.82 for the apex/cuff 0.89, and 0.84 for the cervix and vaginal fornix, respectively.
Conclusion
There is an almost perfect inter-examiner agreement of the S-POP system for the overall stage and each point within the system.