Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neuroradiology 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Multi-parametric ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery disease—comparison with CT angiography

Authors: Kristian Barlinn, Thomas Floegel, Hagen H. Kitzler, Jessica Kepplinger, Timo Siepmann, Lars-Peder Pallesen, Ulf Bodechtel, Heinz Reichmann, Andrei V. Alexandrov, Volker Puetz

Published in: Neuroradiology | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (known by its acronym DEGUM) recently proposed a novel multi-parametric ultrasound approach for comprehensive and accurate assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) steno-occlusive disease. We determined the agreement between duplex ultrasonography (DUS) interpreted by the DEGUM criteria and CT angiography (CTA) for grading of extracranial ICA steno-occlusive disease.

Methods

Consecutive patients with acute cerebral ischemia underwent DUS and CTA. Internal carotid artery stenosis was graded according to the DEGUM-recommended criteria for DUS. Independent readers manually performed North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial-type measurements on axial CTA source images. Both modalities were compared using Spearman’s correlation and Bland-Altman analyses.

Results

A total of 303 acute cerebral ischemia patients (mean age, 72 ± 12 years; 58 % men; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 4 [interquartile range 7]) provided 593 DUS and CTA vessel pairs for comparison. There was a positive correlation between DUS and CTA (r s  = 0.783, p < 0.001) with mean difference in degree of stenosis measurement of 3.57 %. Bland-Altman analysis further revealed widely varying differences (95 % limits of agreement −29.26 to 22.84) between the two modalities.

Conclusion

Although the novel DEGUM criteria showed overall good agreement between DUS and CTA across all stenosis ranges, potential for wide incongruence with CTA underscores the need for local laboratory validation to avoid false screening results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grau AJ, Weimar C, Buggle F, Heinrich A, Goertler M, Neumaier S et al (2001) Risk factors, outcome, and treatment in subtypes of ischemic stroke: the German stroke data bank. Stroke 32:2559–2566CrossRefPubMed Grau AJ, Weimar C, Buggle F, Heinrich A, Goertler M, Neumaier S et al (2001) Risk factors, outcome, and treatment in subtypes of ischemic stroke: the German stroke data bank. Stroke 32:2559–2566CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Petty GW, Brown RD Jr, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO (1999) Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke 30:2513–2516CrossRefPubMed Petty GW, Brown RD Jr, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO (1999) Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke 30:2513–2516CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR et al (2003) Analysis of pooled data from the randomized controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 361:107–116CrossRefPubMed Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR et al (2003) Analysis of pooled data from the randomized controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 361:107–116CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 351:1379–1387CrossRef European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 351:1379–1387CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB et al (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339:1415–1425CrossRefPubMed Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB et al (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339:1415–1425CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, Peto C, Peto R, Potter J et al (2004) Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1491–1502CrossRefPubMed Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, Peto C, Peto R, Potter J et al (2004) Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1491–1502CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dawkins AA, Evans AL, Wattam J, Romanowski CA, Connolly DJ, Hodgson TJ et al (2007) Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology 49:753–759CrossRefPubMed Dawkins AA, Evans AL, Wattam J, Romanowski CA, Connolly DJ, Hodgson TJ et al (2007) Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology 49:753–759CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL et al (2011) ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. Circulation 124:489–532CrossRefPubMed Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL et al (2011) ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. Circulation 124:489–532CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference U-King-Im JM, Young V, Gillard JH (2009) Carotid-artery imaging in the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol 8:569–580CrossRefPubMed U-King-Im JM, Young V, Gillard JH (2009) Carotid-artery imaging in the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol 8:569–580CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zavanone C, Ragone E, Samson Y (2012) Concordance rates of Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography in the grading of carotid artery stenosis: a systematic literature review. J Neurol 259:1015–1018CrossRefPubMed Zavanone C, Ragone E, Samson Y (2012) Concordance rates of Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography in the grading of carotid artery stenosis: a systematic literature review. J Neurol 259:1015–1018CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van Prehn J, Muhs BE, Pramanik B, Ollenschleger M, Rockman CB, Cayne NS et al (2008) Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:267–72CrossRefPubMed van Prehn J, Muhs BE, Pramanik B, Ollenschleger M, Rockman CB, Cayne NS et al (2008) Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:267–72CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Müller M, Agten CA, Österreich M, Hoffmann M (2015) Assessing internal carotid artery stenosis with a semiautomated computed tomography angiography tool and duplex ultrasound. J Vasc Surg 61:1449–1456CrossRefPubMed Müller M, Agten CA, Österreich M, Hoffmann M (2015) Assessing internal carotid artery stenosis with a semiautomated computed tomography angiography tool and duplex ultrasound. J Vasc Surg 61:1449–1456CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S, Soinne L, Railo M, Valanne L (2007) CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:97–103CrossRefPubMed Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S, Soinne L, Railo M, Valanne L (2007) CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:97–103CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Fox AJ (2006) Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:13–19PubMed Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Fox AJ (2006) Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:13–19PubMed
15.
go back to reference Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI et al (2003) Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 229:340–346CrossRefPubMed Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI et al (2003) Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 229:340–346CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Beach KW, Bergelin RO, Leotta DF, Primozich JF, Sevareid PM, Stutzman ET et al (2010) Standardized ultrasound evaluation of carotid stenosis for clinical trials: University of Washington Ultrasound Reading Center. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 8:39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beach KW, Bergelin RO, Leotta DF, Primozich JF, Sevareid PM, Stutzman ET et al (2010) Standardized ultrasound evaluation of carotid stenosis for clinical trials: University of Washington Ultrasound Reading Center. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 8:39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Arning C, Widder B, von Reutern GM, Stiegler H, Görtler M (2010) Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement. Ultraschall Med 31:251–257CrossRefPubMed Arning C, Widder B, von Reutern GM, Stiegler H, Görtler M (2010) Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement. Ultraschall Med 31:251–257CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Klingelhöfer J (2014) Ultrasonography of carotid stenosis. Int J Clin Neurosci Ment Health 1:S04CrossRef Klingelhöfer J (2014) Ultrasonography of carotid stenosis. Int J Clin Neurosci Ment Health 1:S04CrossRef
19.
go back to reference von Reutern GM, Goertler MW, Bornstein NM, Del Sette M, Evans DH, Hetzel A et al (2012) Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods. Stroke 43:916–921CrossRef von Reutern GM, Goertler MW, Bornstein NM, Del Sette M, Evans DH, Hetzel A et al (2012) Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods. Stroke 43:916–921CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i:307–310. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i:307–310.
22.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
24.
go back to reference Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM (2002) Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:21–28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM (2002) Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:21–28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, Wartolowska K, Berry E (2006) Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 367:1503–1512CrossRefPubMed Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, Wartolowska K, Berry E (2006) Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 367:1503–1512CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chappell FM, Wardlaw JM, Young GR, Gillard JH, Roditi GH, Yip B et al (2009) Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive tests—individual patient data meta-analysis. Radiology 251:493–502CrossRefPubMed Chappell FM, Wardlaw JM, Young GR, Gillard JH, Roditi GH, Yip B et al (2009) Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive tests—individual patient data meta-analysis. Radiology 251:493–502CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Alexandrov AV, Needleman L (2012) Carotid artery stenosis: making complex assessments of a simple problem or simplifying approach to a complex disease? Stroke 43:627–628CrossRefPubMed Alexandrov AV, Needleman L (2012) Carotid artery stenosis: making complex assessments of a simple problem or simplifying approach to a complex disease? Stroke 43:627–628CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Koga M, Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T (2001) Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:413–417PubMed Koga M, Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T (2001) Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:413–417PubMed
29.
go back to reference Neschis DG, Lexta FJ, Davis JT, Carpenter JP (2001) Duplex criteria for determination of 50 % or greater carotid stenosis. J Ultrasound Med 20:207–215PubMed Neschis DG, Lexta FJ, Davis JT, Carpenter JP (2001) Duplex criteria for determination of 50 % or greater carotid stenosis. J Ultrasound Med 20:207–215PubMed
30.
go back to reference Hirt LS (2014) Progression rate and ipsilateral neurological events in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 45:702–706CrossRefPubMed Hirt LS (2014) Progression rate and ipsilateral neurological events in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 45:702–706CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Multi-parametric ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery disease—comparison with CT angiography
Authors
Kristian Barlinn
Thomas Floegel
Hagen H. Kitzler
Jessica Kepplinger
Timo Siepmann
Lars-Peder Pallesen
Ulf Bodechtel
Heinz Reichmann
Andrei V. Alexandrov
Volker Puetz
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neuroradiology / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1706-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Neuroradiology 9/2016 Go to the issue