Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Invited Commentary

mTOR Inhibitors and their Role in Modern Concepts of Immunosuppression

Author: Björn Nashan

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Schwarz et al. [1], from the Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Hospital Saint Antoine, Paris, report in this issue on major thoracic and/or abdominal surgery performed nine times in six liver transplant recipients, without discontinuation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) for baseline immunosuppression. Sirolimus or everolimus were given in three patients each; trough levels were 8–10 ng/ml for sirolimus and 6–8 ng/ml for everolimus. In addition, five patients received mycophenolate mofetil, while one patient received cyclosporine. No major complications were observed and none that could be particularly attributed to mTOR inhibitors. The findings demonstrate that major surgery is very feasible in patients receiving antiproliferative immunosuppressive agents without mTOR cessation, and the rate of complications does not exceed that observed in major surgery. The presented findings are important, even though they are from a single center and only a small patient population, particularly since single-center reports and single-center studies using sirolimus fostered the current opinion that mTOR inhibitors increase surgical complications [2, 3]. In order to understand the background of this global rumor, a closer look into the facts might be helpful. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwarz L, Cauchy F, Conti F et al (2014) Preliminary report of major surgery in liver transplant recipients receiving m-TOR inhibitors without therapeutic discontinuation. World J Surg. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2693-x Schwarz L, Cauchy F, Conti F et al (2014) Preliminary report of major surgery in liver transplant recipients receiving m-TOR inhibitors without therapeutic discontinuation. World J Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-014-2693-x
2.
go back to reference Nashan B, Citterio F (2012) Wound healing complications and the use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a critical review of the literature. Transplantation 94(6):547–561PubMedCrossRef Nashan B, Citterio F (2012) Wound healing complications and the use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a critical review of the literature. Transplantation 94(6):547–561PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference ZORTRESS (prescribing information) (2012) Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Corp, East Hanover ZORTRESS (prescribing information) (2012) Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Corp, East Hanover
9.
go back to reference Nashan B, Curtis J, Ponticelli C et al (2004) Everolimus and reduced-exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal-transplant recipients: a three-year phase II, randomized, multicenter, open-label study. Transplantation 78(9):1332–1340PubMedCrossRef Nashan B, Curtis J, Ponticelli C et al (2004) Everolimus and reduced-exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal-transplant recipients: a three-year phase II, randomized, multicenter, open-label study. Transplantation 78(9):1332–1340PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tedesco Silva H Jr, Cibrik D, Johnston T et al (2010) Everolimus plus reduced exposure CsA versus mycophenolic acid plus standard-exposure CsA in renal-transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 10(6):1401–1413PubMedCrossRef Tedesco Silva H Jr, Cibrik D, Johnston T et al (2010) Everolimus plus reduced exposure CsA versus mycophenolic acid plus standard-exposure CsA in renal-transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 10(6):1401–1413PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vítko Š, Margreiter R, Weimar W et al (2005) Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant 5(10):2521–2530PubMedCrossRef Vítko Š, Margreiter R, Weimar W et al (2005) Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant 5(10):2521–2530PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bohra R, Schöning W, Klawitter J et al (2012) Everolimus and sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine have different effects on renal metabolism in the rat. PLoS One 7(10):e48063PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bohra R, Schöning W, Klawitter J et al (2012) Everolimus and sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine have different effects on renal metabolism in the rat. PLoS One 7(10):e48063PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Serkova N, Christians U (2003) Transplantation: toxicokinetics and mechanisms of toxicity of cyclosporine and macrolides. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 4:1287–1296PubMed Serkova N, Christians U (2003) Transplantation: toxicokinetics and mechanisms of toxicity of cyclosporine and macrolides. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 4:1287–1296PubMed
14.
go back to reference Serkova N, Jacobsen W, Niemann CU, Litt L, Benet LZ et al (2001) Sirolimus, but not the structurally related RAD (everolimus), enhances the negative effects of cyclosporine on mitochondrial metabolism in the rat brain. Br J Pharmacol 133:875–885PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Serkova N, Jacobsen W, Niemann CU, Litt L, Benet LZ et al (2001) Sirolimus, but not the structurally related RAD (everolimus), enhances the negative effects of cyclosporine on mitochondrial metabolism in the rat brain. Br J Pharmacol 133:875–885PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nashan B, Gaston G, Emery V et al (2012) Review of cytomegalovirus infection findings with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapy in de novo renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 93:1075–1085PubMedCrossRef Nashan B, Gaston G, Emery V et al (2012) Review of cytomegalovirus infection findings with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapy in de novo renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 93:1075–1085PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Klintmalm GB, Saab S, Hong JC, Nashan B (2014) The role of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in the management of post-transplant malignancy. Clin Transplant 28(6):635–648PubMedCrossRef Klintmalm GB, Saab S, Hong JC, Nashan B (2014) The role of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in the management of post-transplant malignancy. Clin Transplant 28(6):635–648PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference De Simone P, Nevens F, De Carlis L et al (2012) Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus improves renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant 12(11):3008–3020PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef De Simone P, Nevens F, De Carlis L et al (2012) Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus improves renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant 12(11):3008–3020PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Humar A, Ramcharan T, Denny R et al (2001) Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression? Transplantation 72(12):1920–1923PubMedCrossRef Humar A, Ramcharan T, Denny R et al (2001) Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression? Transplantation 72(12):1920–1923PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Azzola A, Havryk A, Chhajed P et al (2004) Everolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are potent inhibitors of fibroblast proliferation after lung transplantation. Transplantation 77(2):275–280PubMedCrossRef Azzola A, Havryk A, Chhajed P et al (2004) Everolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are potent inhibitors of fibroblast proliferation after lung transplantation. Transplantation 77(2):275–280PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
mTOR Inhibitors and their Role in Modern Concepts of Immunosuppression
Author
Björn Nashan
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2756-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

World Journal of Surgery 12/2014 Go to the issue