Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2004

01-10-2004 | Physics

MRI quality control: six imagers studied using eleven unified image quality parameters

Authors: T. Ihalainen, O. Sipilä, S. Savolainen

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Quality control of the magnetic resonance imagers of different vendors in the clinical environment is non-harmonised, and comparing the performance is difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a harmonised long-term quality control protocol for the six imagers in our organisation in order to assure that they fulfil the same basic image quality requirements. The same Eurospin phantom set and identical imaging parameters were used with each imager. Values of 11 comparable parameters describing the image quality were measured. Automatic image analysis software was developed to objectively analyse the images. The results proved that the imagers were operating at a performance level adequate for clinical imaging. Some deficiencies were detected in image uniformity and geometry. The automated analysis of the Eurospin phantom images was successful. The measurements were successfully repeated after 2 weeks on one imager and after half a year on all imagers. As an objective way of examining the image quality, this kind of comparable and objective quality control of different imagers is considered as an essential step towards harmonisation of the clinical MRI studies through a large hospital organisation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kugel H, Bremer C et al (2003) Hazardous situation in the MR bore: induction in ECG leads causes fire. Eur Radiol 13:690–694PubMed Kugel H, Bremer C et al (2003) Hazardous situation in the MR bore: induction in ECG leads causes fire. Eur Radiol 13:690–694PubMed
2.
go back to reference de Certaines JD, Cathelineau G (2001) Safety aspects and quality assessment in MRI and MRS: a challenge for health care systems in Europe. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:632–638CrossRefPubMed de Certaines JD, Cathelineau G (2001) Safety aspects and quality assessment in MRI and MRS: a challenge for health care systems in Europe. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:632–638CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Price RR, Axel L et al (1990) Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group No. 1. Med Phys 17:287–295CrossRefPubMed Price RR, Axel L et al (1990) Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group No. 1. Med Phys 17:287–295CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Och JG, Clarke GD et al (1992) Acceptance testing of magnetic resonance imaging systems: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group No. 6. Med Phys 19:217–229CrossRefPubMed Och JG, Clarke GD et al (1992) Acceptance testing of magnetic resonance imaging systems: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group No. 6. Med Phys 19:217–229CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (2000) Site scanning instructions for use of the MR phantom for the ACR MRI accreditation program American College of Radiology (2000) Site scanning instructions for use of the MR phantom for the ACR MRI accreditation program
6.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (2000) Phantom test guidance for the ACR MRI accreditation program American College of Radiology (2000) Phantom test guidance for the ACR MRI accreditation program
7.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging quality control manual American College of Radiology (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging quality control manual
8.
go back to reference Lerski RA (1993) Trial of modifications to Eurospin MRI test objects. Magn Reson Imaging 11:835–839PubMed Lerski RA (1993) Trial of modifications to Eurospin MRI test objects. Magn Reson Imaging 11:835–839PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lerski RA, de Certaines JD (1993) Performance assessment and quality control in MRI by Eurospin test objects and protocols. Magn Reson Imaging 11:817–833PubMed Lerski RA, de Certaines JD (1993) Performance assessment and quality control in MRI by Eurospin test objects and protocols. Magn Reson Imaging 11:817–833PubMed
10.
go back to reference Firbank MJ, Harrison RM et al (2000) Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience. Br J Radiol 73:376–383 Firbank MJ, Harrison RM et al (2000) Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience. Br J Radiol 73:376–383
11.
go back to reference Gardner EA, Ellis JH et al (1995) Detection of degradation of magnetic resonance (MR) images: comparison of an automated MR image-quality analysis system with trained human observers. Acad Radiol 2:277–281PubMed Gardner EA, Ellis JH et al (1995) Detection of degradation of magnetic resonance (MR) images: comparison of an automated MR image-quality analysis system with trained human observers. Acad Radiol 2:277–281PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bourel P, Gibon D et al (1999) Automatic quality assessment protocol for MRI equipment. Med Phys 26:2693–2700CrossRefPubMed Bourel P, Gibon D et al (1999) Automatic quality assessment protocol for MRI equipment. Med Phys 26:2693–2700CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Diagnostic Sonar Ltd (1992–1995) Eurospin II magnetic resonance quality assessment test objects. Instructions for use, Livingston, Scotland Diagnostic Sonar Ltd (1992–1995) Eurospin II magnetic resonance quality assessment test objects. Instructions for use, Livingston, Scotland
14.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association (1988). Determination of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diagnostic magnetic resonance images. Washington, DC National Electrical Manufacturers Association (1988). Determination of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diagnostic magnetic resonance images. Washington, DC
15.
go back to reference Kaufman L, Kramer DM et al (1989) Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging. Radiology 173:265–267PubMed Kaufman L, Kramer DM et al (1989) Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging. Radiology 173:265–267PubMed
16.
go back to reference Haacke EM, Brown RW et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging. Physical principles and sequence design. Wiley, USA Haacke EM, Brown RW et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging. Physical principles and sequence design. Wiley, USA
17.
go back to reference Hough PVC (1962). Methods and means for recognising complex patterns. US Patent 3 069 654 Hough PVC (1962). Methods and means for recognising complex patterns. US Patent 3 069 654
18.
go back to reference Price RR, Allison J et al (2002) Practical aspects of functional MRI (NMR Task group #8). Med Phys 29:1892–1912CrossRefPubMed Price RR, Allison J et al (2002) Practical aspects of functional MRI (NMR Task group #8). Med Phys 29:1892–1912CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MRI quality control: six imagers studied using eleven unified image quality parameters
Authors
T. Ihalainen
O. Sipilä
S. Savolainen
Publication date
01-10-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2004
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2278-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2004

European Radiology 10/2004 Go to the issue