Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Knee Arthroplasty

MRI after unicondylar knee arthroplasty: rotational alignment of components

Authors: Thomas J. Heyse, Jens Figiel, Ulrike Hähnlein, Jan Schmitt, Nina Timmesfeld, Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann, Turgay Efe

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

This pilot study used magnet resonance imaging (MRI) to analyse the rotation of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) components and assessed how accurately the results could be reproduced.

Materials and methods

Knee MRI using a special protocol to reduce metal artefact was performed in ten patients who had undergone medial UKA. Two independent investigators measured the rotation angle of femoral (zirconium) and tibial (cemented full-poly or cemented modular metal-backed) components applying different reference lines for the latter. Statistical analysis comprised tests for reliability, variance between measurement techniques, standard deviations and limits of agreement.

Results

For all methods tested, there was sufficient inter- and intra-observer reliability. Lowest variances were, however, found for the femoral epicondyles, for both femoral and tibial components. A tangent to the dorsal epicondyles of the tibia also gave reproducible results with low variances for the tibial component.

Discussion

Almost all applied measurement techniques were reproducible by statistical definition, although some of them resulted in substantial differences between both, observations and observers. A variance test helps to distinguish better between clinically useful and less accurate references.

Conclusion

MRI allows good reproducible rotation analysis via the femoral epicondyles for both femoral and tibial UKA implants. For the tibia, the tibial tuberosity, the eminentia and the tibial epicondyles in particular were shown to be less reliable. The dorsal epicondyles seem to be most suitable for the tibial component.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(12):2235–2239PubMed Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(12):2235–2239PubMed
2.
go back to reference Parratte S, Argenson JN, Dumas J, Aubaniac JM (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for avascular osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:37–42PubMed Parratte S, Argenson JN, Dumas J, Aubaniac JM (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for avascular osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:37–42PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11(7):782–788PubMedCrossRef Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11(7):782–788PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Cartier P (2010) UKA after spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a retrospective analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 24 Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Cartier P (2010) UKA after spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a retrospective analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 24
5.
go back to reference Engh GA (2002) Orthopaedic crossfire–can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):54–55PubMedCrossRef Engh GA (2002) Orthopaedic crossfire–can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):54–55PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sculco TP (2002) Orthopaedic crossfire–can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in opposition. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):56–58PubMedCrossRef Sculco TP (2002) Orthopaedic crossfire–can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in opposition. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):56–58PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:157–164PubMed Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:157–164PubMed
8.
go back to reference Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L (1986) Survival of knee arthroplasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(5):795–803PubMed Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L (1986) Survival of knee arthroplasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(5):795–803PubMed
9.
go back to reference Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78(1):128–135PubMedCrossRef Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78(1):128–135PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 69(5):469–474PubMedCrossRef Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 69(5):469–474PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47PubMed Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47PubMed
12.
go back to reference Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153PubMedCrossRef Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sofka CM, Potter HG, Figgie M, Laskin R (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:129–135PubMedCrossRef Sofka CM, Potter HG, Figgie M, Laskin R (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:129–135PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Potter HG, Foo LF (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 37(3):361–73, vi–vii Potter HG, Foo LF (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 37(3):361–73, vi–vii
15.
go back to reference Heyse TJ, Chong LR, Davis J, Boettner F, Haas SB, Potter HG (2012) MRI analysis for rotation of total knee components. Knee Heyse TJ, Chong LR, Davis J, Boettner F, Haas SB, Potter HG (2012) MRI analysis for rotation of total knee components. Knee
16.
go back to reference Bonnin MP, Saffarini M, Mercier PE, Laurent JR, Carrillon Y (2010) Is the Anterior Tibial Tuberosity a Reliable Rotational Landmark for the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty Bonnin MP, Saffarini M, Mercier PE, Laurent JR, Carrillon Y (2010) Is the Anterior Tibial Tuberosity a Reliable Rotational Landmark for the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty
17.
go back to reference Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176PubMedCrossRef Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Gunther KP, Kirschner S Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty is better at the medial third of tibial tuberosity than at the medial border. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:57 Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Gunther KP, Kirschner S Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty is better at the medial third of tibial tuberosity than at the medial border. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:57
19.
go back to reference Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:39–42PubMedCrossRef Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:39–42PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(3):506–511PubMed Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(3):506–511PubMed
21.
go back to reference Diezi C, Wirth S, Meyer DC, Koch PP Effect of femoral to tibial varus mismatch on the contact area of unicondylar knee prostheses. Knee 17(5):350–5 Diezi C, Wirth S, Meyer DC, Koch PP Effect of femoral to tibial varus mismatch on the contact area of unicondylar knee prostheses. Knee 17(5):350–5
22.
go back to reference Middleton FR, Palmer SH (2007) How accurate is Whiteside’s line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 14(3):204–207PubMedCrossRef Middleton FR, Palmer SH (2007) How accurate is Whiteside’s line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 14(3):204–207PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(3):194–197PubMedCrossRef Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(3):194–197PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55PubMedCrossRef Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
MRI after unicondylar knee arthroplasty: rotational alignment of components
Authors
Thomas J. Heyse
Jens Figiel
Ulrike Hähnlein
Jan Schmitt
Nina Timmesfeld
Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
Turgay Efe
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1817-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 11/2013 Go to the issue