Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2010

01-05-2010 | Vascular-Interventional

MRI after implantation of a novel femoral closure device following intra-arterial catheterisation: implications for subsequent contrast-enhanced MR angiography

Authors: Oliver K. Mohrs, Steffen E. Petersen, Bernd Nowak, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Thomas Voigtlaender

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess MRI safety aspects and artefacts of a novel femoral artery closure device during contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients following intra-arterial catheterisation.

Methods

Ten consecutive patients underwent MRI within 24 h of coronary angiography and placement of a femoral artery closure device. We used a T2-weighted gradient-echo MRI sequence to measure the device-related artefact size in comparison with a phantom image, phase-contrast flow measurement proximal to, at the level of and distal to the device to quantify potential differences in flow velocity and contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MR angiography to differentiate potential femoral artery stenosis from device-related artefacts.

Results

The mean size of the oval-shaped artefact was 8.4 × 6.6 mm (±1.0 × 0.8 mm) and was almost identical to the maximum artefact size of the phantom measurement (8.3 × 5.7 mm). Device placement did not result in an increased peak velocity (proximal 69 ± 23 cm/s, at the level of 64 ± 11 cm/s and distal to the device 63 ± 12 cm/s, p = 0.67). The mean artefact penetration into the vessel lumen was 0.5 ± 0.5 mm (percentage vessel narrowing 7.0 ± 6%; range 0–16%).

Conclusion

The MR conditional StarClose femoral artery closure device was used safely within 24 h of deployment at 1.5 T. Despite clip-related artefacts MR angiography will allow for easy differentiation of clip-related artefacts from high-grade atherosclerotic stenosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Turi ZG (2005) Overview of vascular closure. Endovascular Today 4:32–34 Turi ZG (2005) Overview of vascular closure. Endovascular Today 4:32–34
2.
go back to reference Sanborn TA, Kussmaul WG, Hinohara T (1999) Percutaneous vascular hemostasis devices for arterial sealing after interventional procedures. In: Topol EJ (ed) Textbook of interventional cardiology. 3rdrd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 693–700 Sanborn TA, Kussmaul WG, Hinohara T (1999) Percutaneous vascular hemostasis devices for arterial sealing after interventional procedures. In: Topol EJ (ed) Textbook of interventional cardiology. 3rdrd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 693–700
3.
go back to reference Warren BS, Warren SG, Miller SD (1999) Predictors of complications and learning curve using the Angio-Seal closure device following interventional and diagnostic catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 48:162–166CrossRefPubMed Warren BS, Warren SG, Miller SD (1999) Predictors of complications and learning curve using the Angio-Seal closure device following interventional and diagnostic catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 48:162–166CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Meaney JFM (2003) Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries: current status. Eur Radiol 13:836–852PubMed Meaney JFM (2003) Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries: current status. Eur Radiol 13:836–852PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dauerman HL, Applegate RJ, Cohen DJ (2007) Vascular closure devices: the second decade. J Am Coll Cardiol 23;50:1617–1626 Dauerman HL, Applegate RJ, Cohen DJ (2007) Vascular closure devices: the second decade. J Am Coll Cardiol 23;50:1617–1626
6.
go back to reference Hermiller JB, Simonton C, Hinohara T, Lee D, Cannon L, Mooney M, O’Shaughnessy C, Carlson H, Fortuna R, Zapien M, Fletcher DR, DiDonato K, Chou TM (2006) The starclose vascular closure system: interventional results from the CLIP study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68:677–683CrossRefPubMed Hermiller JB, Simonton C, Hinohara T, Lee D, Cannon L, Mooney M, O’Shaughnessy C, Carlson H, Fortuna R, Zapien M, Fletcher DR, DiDonato K, Chou TM (2006) The starclose vascular closure system: interventional results from the CLIP study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68:677–683CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Veasey RA, Large JK, Silberbauer J, Paul G, Taggu W, Ellery S, Rathore VS, Lloyd GW, Patel NR, Sulke AN (2008) A randomised controlled trial comparing StarClose and AngioSeal vascular closure devices in a district general hospital—the SCOAST study. Int J Clin Pract 62:912–918CrossRefPubMed Veasey RA, Large JK, Silberbauer J, Paul G, Taggu W, Ellery S, Rathore VS, Lloyd GW, Patel NR, Sulke AN (2008) A randomised controlled trial comparing StarClose and AngioSeal vascular closure devices in a district general hospital—the SCOAST study. Int J Clin Pract 62:912–918CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Farouque HM, Tremmel JA, Raissi Shabari F, Aggarwal M, Fearon WF, Ng MK, Rezaee M, Yeung AC, Lee DP (2005) Risk factors for the development of retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:363–368CrossRefPubMed Farouque HM, Tremmel JA, Raissi Shabari F, Aggarwal M, Fearon WF, Ng MK, Rezaee M, Yeung AC, Lee DP (2005) Risk factors for the development of retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:363–368CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kos S, Huegli R, Bongartz GM, Jacob AL, Bilecen D (2008) MR-guided endovascular interventions: a comprehensive review on techniques and applications. Eur Radiol 18:645–657CrossRefPubMed Kos S, Huegli R, Bongartz GM, Jacob AL, Bilecen D (2008) MR-guided endovascular interventions: a comprehensive review on techniques and applications. Eur Radiol 18:645–657CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MRI after implantation of a novel femoral closure device following intra-arterial catheterisation: implications for subsequent contrast-enhanced MR angiography
Authors
Oliver K. Mohrs
Steffen E. Petersen
Bernd Nowak
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Thomas Voigtlaender
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1661-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

European Radiology 5/2010 Go to the issue