Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Scientific Article

MR imaging of the intraarticular disk of the acromioclavicular joint: a comparison with anatomical, histological and in-vivo findings

Authors: Guido Heers, Jürgen Götz, Thomas Schubert, Henrik Schachner, Ulrich Neumaier, Joachim Grifka, Achim Hedtmann

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To characterize MRI features of the intraarticular disk of the acromioclavicular joint.

Design

We studied the appearance of 11 acromioclavicular joints of six cadavers (subjects aged 57–89 years at the time of death) and six healthy shoulders on T1-weighted, T2 (TSE)-weighted, STIR and PD (fat saturated) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared the findings with observations during dissection and histological examination.

Results

Macroscopic examinations showed two wedge-shaped disks underneath the superior and above the inferior joint capsule in nine specimens. In two specimens the acromioclavicular joints were degenerated. Histologically, the disk tissue consisted of fibrocartilage whereas the joint cartilage was partly degenerated, containing zones of fibrocartilage amidst degenerated hyaline cartilage, which may explain the similar signal intensity of both structures in all sequences used. MR appearance of the intraarticular structures of the acromioclavicular joint was similar in cadaveric and healthy shoulders.

Conclusions

The difficulties related to imaging the acromioclavicular joint may be explained by the anatomy. Similar signal intensity of cartilage and disk may be explained by their similar histological structure (fibrocartilage). MRI findings should be interpreted with respect to the variable anatomy. These results may serve as a basis for further radiological studies of the acromioclavicular joint.
Literature
1.
go back to reference DePalma AF. Surgical anatomy of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. Surg Clin North Am 1963;43:1540 DePalma AF. Surgical anatomy of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. Surg Clin North Am 1963;43:1540
2.
go back to reference Salter EG, Nasca RJ, Shelley BS. Anatomical observations on the acromioclavicular joint and supporting ligaments. Am J Sports Med 1987;15:199–206PubMedCrossRef Salter EG, Nasca RJ, Shelley BS. Anatomical observations on the acromioclavicular joint and supporting ligaments. Am J Sports Med 1987;15:199–206PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med 1991;10:823–37PubMed Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med 1991;10:823–37PubMed
4.
go back to reference Jordan LK, Kenter K, Griffiths HL. Relationship between MRI and clinical findings in the acromioclavicular joint. Skelet Radiol 2002;31(9):516–21, SepCrossRef Jordan LK, Kenter K, Griffiths HL. Relationship between MRI and clinical findings in the acromioclavicular joint. Skelet Radiol 2002;31(9):516–21, SepCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schweitzer ME, Magbalon MJ, Frieman BG, Ehrlich S, Epstein RE. Acromioclavicular joint fluid: determination of clinical significance with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;192(1):205–7, JulPubMed Schweitzer ME, Magbalon MJ, Frieman BG, Ehrlich S, Epstein RE. Acromioclavicular joint fluid: determination of clinical significance with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;192(1):205–7, JulPubMed
Metadata
Title
MR imaging of the intraarticular disk of the acromioclavicular joint: a comparison with anatomical, histological and in-vivo findings
Authors
Guido Heers
Jürgen Götz
Thomas Schubert
Henrik Schachner
Ulrich Neumaier
Joachim Grifka
Achim Hedtmann
Publication date
01-01-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0181-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Skeletal Radiology 1/2007 Go to the issue