Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 3/2022

Open Access 29-03-2021 | Movement Limitation | Original Article

Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study

Authors: A. Parseliunas, S. Paskauskas, V. Simatoniene, J. Vaitekunas, D. Venskutonis

Published in: Hernia | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome following surgery. The Carolinas Comfort scale (CCS) is a specific questionnaire used to evaluate QoL in patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair with mesh. The aim of this study was to create a Lithuanian version of the CCS.

Methods

A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A Lithuanian version of the CCS was created by translating the original questionnaire in accordance with the guidelines. The Lithuanian questionnaire was provided to hernia patients at 1 week and at 1 month postoperatively. The main validation characteristics of the Lithuanian CCS were assessed and compared to the original version.

Results

The complete response rate of patients was close to 90%. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.953. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.361 to 0.703 in the test–retest analysis. In the construct validity analysis, the strongest correlations were observed in the domains of physical functioning and bodily pain (− 0.655 and − 0.584, respectively) and the weakest correlations in role-emotional and mental health (− 0.268 and − 0.230, respectively). The mean scores of all CCS domains and the total score for satisfied patients were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than those of dissatisfied patients. The principal component analysis identified 3 components, with the first accounting for 56% of the variance.

Conclusions

The Lithuanian version of CCS maintains the original validity and is a reliable and valid tool for assessing specific QoL factors after the repair of inguinal hernia with mesh. We recommend using this CCS version in personal, local, and international contexts.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nielsen K, Poelman MM, Den Bakker FM, Van Der Ploeg T, Bonjer HJ, Schreurs WH (2014) Comparison of the Dutch and English versions of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a specific quality-of-life questionnaire for abdominal hernia repairs with mesh. Hernia 18:459–464PubMed Nielsen K, Poelman MM, Den Bakker FM, Van Der Ploeg T, Bonjer HJ, Schreurs WH (2014) Comparison of the Dutch and English versions of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a specific quality-of-life questionnaire for abdominal hernia repairs with mesh. Hernia 18:459–464PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ujiki MB, Gitelis ME, Carbray J et al (2015) Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. SurgEndosc 29:2512–2519 Ujiki MB, Gitelis ME, Carbray J et al (2015) Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. SurgEndosc 29:2512–2519
3.
go back to reference Heniford BT, Lincourt AE, Walters AL, Colavita PD, Belyansky I, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Augenstein VA (2018) Carolinas comfort scale as a measure of hernia repair quality of life. Ann Surg 267:171–176CrossRef Heniford BT, Lincourt AE, Walters AL, Colavita PD, Belyansky I, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Augenstein VA (2018) Carolinas comfort scale as a measure of hernia repair quality of life. Ann Surg 267:171–176CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Heniford BT, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW (2008) Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am CollSurg 206:638–644 Heniford BT, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW (2008) Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am CollSurg 206:638–644
5.
go back to reference Urbach DR (2005) Measuring quality of life after surgery. SurgInnov 12:161–165 Urbach DR (2005) Measuring quality of life after surgery. SurgInnov 12:161–165
6.
go back to reference Velanovich V (1998) Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J GastrointestSurg 2:141–145CrossRef Velanovich V (1998) Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J GastrointestSurg 2:141–145CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cox TC, Huntington CR, Blair LJ, Prasad T, Lincourt AE, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2016) Predictive modeling for chronic pain after ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 212:501–510CrossRef Cox TC, Huntington CR, Blair LJ, Prasad T, Lincourt AE, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2016) Predictive modeling for chronic pain after ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 212:501–510CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Knox RD, Berney CR (2015) A preoperative hernia symptom score predicts inguinal hernia anatomy and outcomes after TEP repair. SurgEndosc 29:481–486 Knox RD, Berney CR (2015) A preoperative hernia symptom score predicts inguinal hernia anatomy and outcomes after TEP repair. SurgEndosc 29:481–486
9.
go back to reference Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W (2011) Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. J EvalClinPract 17:268–274 Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W (2011) Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. J EvalClinPract 17:268–274
10.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sousa VD, Hartman SW, Miller EH, Carroll MA (2009) New measures of diabetes self-care agency, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes self-management for insulin-treated individuals with type 2 diabetes. J ClinNurs 18:1305–1312 Sousa VD, Hartman SW, Miller EH, Carroll MA (2009) New measures of diabetes self-care agency, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes self-management for insulin-treated individuals with type 2 diabetes. J ClinNurs 18:1305–1312
12.
go back to reference Hunter JG, Trus TL, Branum GD, Waring JP, Wood WC (1996) A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 223:673–687CrossRef Hunter JG, Trus TL, Branum GD, Waring JP, Wood WC (1996) A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 223:673–687CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rugiene R, Dadoniene J, Venalis A (2005) Adaptation of health-related quality of life (“SF-36”) questionnaire, its validation and assessment of performance for control group and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Med (Kaunas) 41:232–239 Rugiene R, Dadoniene J, Venalis A (2005) Adaptation of health-related quality of life (“SF-36”) questionnaire, its validation and assessment of performance for control group and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Med (Kaunas) 41:232–239
15.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Froberg DG, Kane RL (1989) Methodology for measuring health-state preferences-II: scaling methods. J ClinEpidemiol 42:459–471 Froberg DG, Kane RL (1989) Methodology for measuring health-state preferences-II: scaling methods. J ClinEpidemiol 42:459–471
18.
go back to reference Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J ClinEpidemiol 53:459–468 Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J ClinEpidemiol 53:459–468
19.
go back to reference Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G et al (2007) The European hernia society groin hernia classication: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11:113–116CrossRef Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G et al (2007) The European hernia society groin hernia classication: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11:113–116CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yeo AET, Berney CR (2012) Carolinas Comfort Scale for mesh repair of inguinal hernia. ANZ J Surg 82:285–286CrossRef Yeo AET, Berney CR (2012) Carolinas Comfort Scale for mesh repair of inguinal hernia. ANZ J Surg 82:285–286CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gitelis ME, Patel L, Deasis F, Joehl R, Lapin B, Linn J, Haggerty S, Denham W, Ujiki MB (2016) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair and quality of life at 2-year follow-up. J Am CollSurg 223:153–161 Gitelis ME, Patel L, Deasis F, Joehl R, Lapin B, Linn J, Haggerty S, Denham W, Ujiki MB (2016) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair and quality of life at 2-year follow-up. J Am CollSurg 223:153–161
22.
go back to reference Andresen K, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J (2015) The initial experience of introducing the onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair in a general surgical department. Scand J Surg 104:61–65CrossRef Andresen K, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J (2015) The initial experience of introducing the onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair in a general surgical department. Scand J Surg 104:61–65CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Christoffersen MW, Rosenberg J, Jorgensen LN, Bytzer P, Bisgaard T (2014) Health-related quality of life scores changes significantly within the first three months after hernia mesh repair. World J Surg 38:1852–1859CrossRef Christoffersen MW, Rosenberg J, Jorgensen LN, Bytzer P, Bisgaard T (2014) Health-related quality of life scores changes significantly within the first three months after hernia mesh repair. World J Surg 38:1852–1859CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L (1992) Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br Med J 305:160–164CrossRef Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L (1992) Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br Med J 305:160–164CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Deyo RA (1989) Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 27:S217–S232CrossRef Patrick DL, Deyo RA (1989) Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 27:S217–S232CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Burney RE, Jones KR, Coon JW, Blewitt DK, Herm A, Peterson M (1997) Core outcomes measures for inguinal hernia repair. J Am CollSurg 185:509–515 Burney RE, Jones KR, Coon JW, Blewitt DK, Herm A, Peterson M (1997) Core outcomes measures for inguinal hernia repair. J Am CollSurg 185:509–515
27.
go back to reference Costello AB, Osborne J (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Res EvalPract Assessment Res Eval 10:1–9 Costello AB, Osborne J (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Res EvalPract Assessment Res Eval 10:1–9
Metadata
Title
Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
Authors
A. Parseliunas
S. Paskauskas
V. Simatoniene
J. Vaitekunas
D. Venskutonis
Publication date
29-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02399-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Hernia 3/2022 Go to the issue