Published in:
01-07-2017 | Review Article
Motor exam of patients with spinal cord injury: a terminological imbroglio
Author:
Nicandro Figueiredo
Published in:
Neurological Sciences
|
Issue 7/2017
Login to get access
Abstract
The description of the motor deficit of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) varies significantly, leading to confusion within the neurological terminology. This paper proposes a concise and easy to use terminology to describe the motor deficit of patients with SCI. A broad review of the origin of the nomenclature used to describe the motor deficit of patients with SCI was performed and discussed. The prefix: “hemi” should be used to describe paralysis of one half of the body; “mono” for one limb; “para” for lower limbs, di” for two symmetrical segments and/or parts in both sides of the body; “tri” for three limbs, or two limbs and one side of the face; and “tetra” for four limbs. The suffix: “plegia” should be used for total paralysis of a limb or part of the body, and “paresis” for partial paralysis. The term “brachial” refers to the upper limbs; and “podal” to the lower limbs. According to the spinal cord origin of the main key muscles for the limbs, patients with complete injury affecting spinal cord segments C1–5 usually presents with “tetraplegia”; C6–T1 presents with “paraplegia and brachial diparesis”; T2–L2 with “paraplegia”; and L3–S1 with “paraparesis”.