Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Motor Evoked Potential | Original Research

Trending algorithm discriminates hemodynamic from injury related TcMEP amplitude loss

Authors: Paul Jasiukaitis, Russ Lyon

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Jasiukaitis and Lyon (J Clin Monit Comput, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10877-018-0181-9, 2018) described an motor evoked potential (MEP)amplitude trending system to detect MEP amplitude loss against a background of MEP variability. They found that the end of case value of a running R2 triggered by a set MEP amplitude loss criterion appeared to discriminate new injury from non-injury in a small sample of three patients. The present study examines the predictive capability of the running R2 in a larger sample of patients (21 injured and 19 non-injured). It also varies the amplitude loss criterion (50%, 65% and 80%) for triggering the running R2 and the numbers of points used in the moving linear regression (8, 12 and 16). 40 patients who had undergone correction for lumbar deformity were retrospectively examined. 21 of these woke up with a newly acquired radicular injury, 19 did not but were characterized by hypovolemic hemorrhage. All 40 patients had sufficient MEP amplitude loss sometime during their procedure to cause the monitoring specialist to report this to the surgeon and anesthesia. End-of-case running R2s were significantly larger in the injury group. Using an 80% amplitude loss criterion to trigger the running R2 proved to be too stringent, causing reduced sensitivity. The running R2 appeared to have equivalent sensitivity to that of conventional MEP amplitude loss ratios, but superior specificity within this monitoring challenged sample. The different number of points for the moving regressions did not have any significant effect. End-of-case R2 values greater than 60% appeared to be highly predictive of new post-operative deficit, while values less than 40% appeared to insure no new deficit. The proposed trending system can discriminate injury from non-injury outcomes when compressive radicular injury during correction for lumbar deformity is involved. This discrimination appears to be successful even when MEP amplitude loss for non-iatrogenic reasons (i.e., hemorrhage) is also occurring.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kuhns CA, Lehman RA Jr, Kim YJ, Stewart D, Baldus C. Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine 2007;32(20):2245–52.CrossRef Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kuhns CA, Lehman RA Jr, Kim YJ, Stewart D, Baldus C. Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine 2007;32(20):2245–52.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ghobrial GM, Williams KA Jr, Arnold P, Fehlings M, Harrop JS. Iatrogenic neurologic deficit after lumbar spine surgery: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;139:76–80.CrossRef Ghobrial GM, Williams KA Jr, Arnold P, Fehlings M, Harrop JS. Iatrogenic neurologic deficit after lumbar spine surgery: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;139:76–80.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hays WL. Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1988. Hays WL. Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1988.
5.
go back to reference Kim DH, Zaremski J, Kwon B, Jenis L, Woodard E, Bode R, Banco RJ. Risk factors for false positive transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring alerts during surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2007;32(26):3041–6.CrossRef Kim DH, Zaremski J, Kwon B, Jenis L, Woodard E, Bode R, Banco RJ. Risk factors for false positive transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring alerts during surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2007;32(26):3041–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 2nd ed. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Co.; 1988. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 2nd ed. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Co.; 1988.
7.
go back to reference Langeloo DD, Journée HL, de Kleuver M, Grotenhuis JA. Criteria for transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal deformity surgery a review and discussion of the literature. Neurophysiol Clin. 2007;37(6):431–9.CrossRef Langeloo DD, Journée HL, de Kleuver M, Grotenhuis JA. Criteria for transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal deformity surgery a review and discussion of the literature. Neurophysiol Clin. 2007;37(6):431–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lieberman JA, Lyon R, Feiner J, Hu SS, Berven SH. The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery. Spine J. 2008;33(13):E414–24. Lieberman JA, Lyon R, Feiner J, Hu SS, Berven SH. The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery. Spine J. 2008;33(13):E414–24.
9.
go back to reference Lieberman JA, Lyon R, Jasiukaitis P, Berven SH, Burch S, Feiner J. (2018), The reliability of motor evoked potentials to predict dorsiflexion injuries during lumbosacral deformity surgery: importance of multiple myotomal monitoring. Spine J. Lieberman JA, Lyon R, Jasiukaitis P, Berven SH, Burch S, Feiner J. (2018), The reliability of motor evoked potentials to predict dorsiflexion injuries during lumbosacral deformity surgery: importance of multiple myotomal monitoring. Spine J.
10.
go back to reference Lyon R, Feiner J, Lieberman JA. Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of “anesthetic fade”. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17(1):13–9.PubMed Lyon R, Feiner J, Lieberman JA. Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of “anesthetic fade”. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17(1):13–9.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Macdonald DB, Stigsby B, Al Homoud I, Abalkhail T, Mokeem A. Utility of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative nerve root monitoring. J Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012;29(2):118–25.CrossRef Macdonald DB, Stigsby B, Al Homoud I, Abalkhail T, Mokeem A. Utility of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative nerve root monitoring. J Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012;29(2):118–25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Overall JE, Klett CJ. Applied multivariate analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1972. Overall JE, Klett CJ. Applied multivariate analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1972.
13.
go back to reference Pinder JP. Introduction to business analytics using simulation. London: Academic Press; 2017. Pinder JP. Introduction to business analytics using simulation. London: Academic Press; 2017.
14.
go back to reference Pateder DB, Kostuik JP. Lumbar nerve root palsy after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine. 2005;30(14):1632–6CrossRef Pateder DB, Kostuik JP. Lumbar nerve root palsy after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine. 2005;30(14):1632–6CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Remington RD, Schork MA. Statistics with applications to the biological & health sciences. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1985. Remington RD, Schork MA. Statistics with applications to the biological & health sciences. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1985.
16.
go back to reference Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, Flynn J, Drummond DS, Bowe JA, Laufer S, Shah SA, Bowen JR, Pizzutillo PD, Jones KJ, Drummond DS. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(11):2440–9.CrossRef Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, Flynn J, Drummond DS, Bowe JA, Laufer S, Shah SA, Bowen JR, Pizzutillo PD, Jones KJ, Drummond DS. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(11):2440–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sutter MA, Eggspuehler A, Grob D, Porchet F, Jeszensky D, Dvorak J. Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during 409 lumbrosacral surgicla procedures in 409 patients. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(Suppl 2):221–8. Sutter MA, Eggspuehler A, Grob D, Porchet F, Jeszensky D, Dvorak J. Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during 409 lumbrosacral surgicla procedures in 409 patients. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(Suppl 2):221–8.
18.
go back to reference Tamkus A, Rice KS, Hoffman G. Transcranial motor evoked potential alarm criteria to predict foot drop injury during lumbosacral surgery. Spine. 2018;43(4):E227–33.CrossRef Tamkus A, Rice KS, Hoffman G. Transcranial motor evoked potential alarm criteria to predict foot drop injury during lumbosacral surgery. Spine. 2018;43(4):E227–33.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Traba A, Romero JP, Arranz B, Vilela C. A new criterion for detection of radiculopathy based on motor evoked potentials and intraoperative nerve root monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;129:2075–82.CrossRef Traba A, Romero JP, Arranz B, Vilela C. A new criterion for detection of radiculopathy based on motor evoked potentials and intraoperative nerve root monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;129:2075–82.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zhuang Q, Wang S, Zhang J, Zhao H, Wang Y, Tian Y, Zhao Y, Li S, Weng X, Qiu G. How to make the best use of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring? Experience in 1162 consecutive spinal deformity surgical procedures. Spine. 2007;39(24):E1425–32. Zhuang Q, Wang S, Zhang J, Zhao H, Wang Y, Tian Y, Zhao Y, Li S, Weng X, Qiu G. How to make the best use of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring? Experience in 1162 consecutive spinal deformity surgical procedures. Spine. 2007;39(24):E1425–32.
Metadata
Title
Trending algorithm discriminates hemodynamic from injury related TcMEP amplitude loss
Authors
Paul Jasiukaitis
Russ Lyon
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00272-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2020 Go to the issue