Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Motor Evoked Potential | Research

Detection of C8/T1 radiculopathy by measuring the root motor conduction time

Authors: Dougho Park, Sang-Eok Lee, Jae Man Cho, Joong Won Yang, Donghoon Yang, Mansu Kim, Heum Dai Kwon

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Root motor conduction time (RMCT) can noninvasively evaluate the status of the proximal root segment. However, its clinical application remains limited, and wider studies regarding its use are scarce. We aimed to investigate the association between C8/T1 level radiculopathy and RMCT.

Methods

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Subjects were extracted from a general hospital’s spine clinic database. A total of 48 C8/T1 root lesions from 37 patients were included, and 48 C8/T1 root levels from control subjects were matched for age, sex, and height. RMCT was measured in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle and the assessment of any delays owing to C8/T1 radiculopathy.

Results

The RMCT of the C8/T1 radiculopathy group was 1.7 ± 0.6 ms, which was significantly longer than that in the control group (1.2 ± 0.8 ms; p = 0.001). The delayed RMCT was independently associated with radiculopathy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.27; p = 0.011) after adjusting for the peripheral motor conduction time, amplitude of median compound motor nerve action potential, and shortest F-wave latency. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve for diagnosing C8/T1 radiculopathy using RMCT was 0.72 (0.61–0.82). The RMCT was significantly correlated with symptom duration (coefficient = 0.58; p < 0.001) but was not associated with the degree of arm pain.

Conclusion

Our findings illustrate the clinical applicability of the RMCT by demonstrating its utility in diagnosing radiculopathy at certain spinal levels.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tarulli AW, Raynor EM. Lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(2):387–405.CrossRef Tarulli AW, Raynor EM. Lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(2):387–405.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mansfield M, Smith T, Spahr N, Thacker M. Cervical spine radiculopathy epidemiology: A systematic review. Musculoskelet Care. 2020;18(4):555–67.CrossRef Mansfield M, Smith T, Spahr N, Thacker M. Cervical spine radiculopathy epidemiology: A systematic review. Musculoskelet Care. 2020;18(4):555–67.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Reza Soltani Z, Sajadi S, Tavana B. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with electrodiagnostic findings in the evaluation of clinical radiculopathy: a cross-sectional study. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(4):916–21.CrossRef Reza Soltani Z, Sajadi S, Tavana B. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with electrodiagnostic findings in the evaluation of clinical radiculopathy: a cross-sectional study. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(4):916–21.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mena J, Sherman AL. Imaging in radiculopathy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011;22(1):41–57.CrossRef Mena J, Sherman AL. Imaging in radiculopathy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011;22(1):41–57.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ. Electrodiagnostic medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2002. Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ. Electrodiagnostic medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2002.
6.
go back to reference Rubinstein SM, Pool JJ, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):307–19.CrossRef Rubinstein SM, Pool JJ, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):307–19.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Li W, Liu YC, Zheng CF, Miao J, Chen H, Quan HY, Yan SH, Zhang K. Diagnosis of Compressed Nerve Root in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients by Surface Electromyography. Orthop Surg. 2018;10(1):47–55.CrossRef Li W, Liu YC, Zheng CF, Miao J, Chen H, Quan HY, Yan SH, Zhang K. Diagnosis of Compressed Nerve Root in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients by Surface Electromyography. Orthop Surg. 2018;10(1):47–55.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tamarkin RG, Isaacson AC. Electrodiagnostic Evaluation Of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy. In: StatPearls. edn. Treasure Island (FL); 2022. Tamarkin RG, Isaacson AC. Electrodiagnostic Evaluation Of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy. In: StatPearls. edn. Treasure Island (FL); 2022.
9.
go back to reference Cushman DM, Strenn Q, Elmer A, Yang AJ, Onofrei L. Complications Associated With Electromyography: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(2):149–55.CrossRef Cushman DM, Strenn Q, Elmer A, Yang AJ, Onofrei L. Complications Associated With Electromyography: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(2):149–55.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chemali KR, Tsao B. Electrodiagnostic testing of nerves and muscles: when, why, and how to order. Cleve Clin J Med. 2005;72(1):37–48.CrossRef Chemali KR, Tsao B. Electrodiagnostic testing of nerves and muscles: when, why, and how to order. Cleve Clin J Med. 2005;72(1):37–48.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Matsumoto H, Hanajima R, Terao Y, Ugawa Y. Magnetic-motor-root stimulation: review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(6):1055–67.CrossRef Matsumoto H, Hanajima R, Terao Y, Ugawa Y. Magnetic-motor-root stimulation: review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(6):1055–67.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mills KR, McLeod C, Sheffy J, Loh L. The optimal current direction for excitation of human cervical motor roots with a double coil magnetic stimulator. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;89(2):138–44.CrossRef Mills KR, McLeod C, Sheffy J, Loh L. The optimal current direction for excitation of human cervical motor roots with a double coil magnetic stimulator. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;89(2):138–44.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Banerjee TK, Mostofi MS, Us O, Weerasinghe V, Sedgwick EM. Magnetic stimulation in the determination of lumbosacral motor radiculopathy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;89(4):221–6.CrossRef Banerjee TK, Mostofi MS, Us O, Weerasinghe V, Sedgwick EM. Magnetic stimulation in the determination of lumbosacral motor radiculopathy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;89(4):221–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Temucin CM, Nurlu G. Measurement of motor root conduction time at the early stage of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(10):1240–5.CrossRef Temucin CM, Nurlu G. Measurement of motor root conduction time at the early stage of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(10):1240–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rayegani SM, Hollisaz MT, Hafezi R, Nassirzadeh S. Application of magnetic motor stimulation for measuring conduction time across the lower part of the brachial plexus. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2008;3:7.PubMedPubMedCentral Rayegani SM, Hollisaz MT, Hafezi R, Nassirzadeh S. Application of magnetic motor stimulation for measuring conduction time across the lower part of the brachial plexus. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2008;3:7.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Samii A, Luciano CA, Dambrosia JM, Hallett M. Central motor conduction time: reproducibility and discomfort of different methods. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21(11):1445–50.CrossRef Samii A, Luciano CA, Dambrosia JM, Hallett M. Central motor conduction time: reproducibility and discomfort of different methods. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21(11):1445–50.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Weber M, Eisen AA. Magnetic stimulation of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25(2):160–75.CrossRef Weber M, Eisen AA. Magnetic stimulation of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25(2):160–75.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Park D, Kim BH, Lee S-E, Cho JM, Yang JW, Yang D, Kim M, Oh G, Sophannara Y, Kwon HD. Normal values of central, peripheral, and root motor conduction times in a healthy Korean population. J Clin Neurophysiol 2022, Publish Ahead of Print. Park D, Kim BH, Lee S-E, Cho JM, Yang JW, Yang D, Kim M, Oh G, Sophannara Y, Kwon HD. Normal values of central, peripheral, and root motor conduction times in a healthy Korean population. J Clin Neurophysiol 2022, Publish Ahead of Print.
19.
go back to reference Preston DC, Shapiro BE, Bolck F. Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic Correlations. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005. Preston DC, Shapiro BE, Bolck F. Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic Correlations. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005.
20.
go back to reference Chokroverty S, Picone MA, Chokroverty M. Percutaneous magnetic coil stimulation of human cervical vertebral column: site of stimulation and clinical application. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;81(5):359–65.CrossRef Chokroverty S, Picone MA, Chokroverty M. Percutaneous magnetic coil stimulation of human cervical vertebral column: site of stimulation and clinical application. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;81(5):359–65.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhao QY, Luo JC, Su Y, Zhang YJ, Tu GW, Luo Z. Propensity score matching with R: conventional methods and new features. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(9):812.CrossRef Zhao QY, Luo JC, Su Y, Zhang YJ, Tu GW, Luo Z. Propensity score matching with R: conventional methods and new features. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(9):812.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Golez A. Motor conduction time along the cauda equina at rest and after walking following electrical and magnetic stimulation. J Surg Res 2020, 03(01). Golez A. Motor conduction time along the cauda equina at rest and after walking following electrical and magnetic stimulation. J Surg Res 2020, 03(01).
23.
go back to reference Secil Y, Ekinci AS, Bayram KB, Incesu TK, Tokucoglu F, Gurgor N, Ozdemirkiran T, Basoglu M, Ertekin C. Diagnostic value of cauda equina motor conduction time in lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(9):1831–5.CrossRef Secil Y, Ekinci AS, Bayram KB, Incesu TK, Tokucoglu F, Gurgor N, Ozdemirkiran T, Basoglu M, Ertekin C. Diagnostic value of cauda equina motor conduction time in lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(9):1831–5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Inaba A, Yokota T, Otagiri A, Nishimura T, Saito Y, Ichikawa T, Mizusawa H. Electrophysiological evaluation of conduction in the most proximal motor root segment. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25(4):608–11.CrossRef Inaba A, Yokota T, Otagiri A, Nishimura T, Saito Y, Ichikawa T, Mizusawa H. Electrophysiological evaluation of conduction in the most proximal motor root segment. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25(4):608–11.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fisher MA. F-waves–physiology and clinical uses. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:144–60.CrossRef Fisher MA. F-waves–physiology and clinical uses. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:144–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Detection of C8/T1 radiculopathy by measuring the root motor conduction time
Authors
Dougho Park
Sang-Eok Lee
Jae Man Cho
Joong Won Yang
Donghoon Yang
Mansu Kim
Heum Dai Kwon
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02915-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Neurology 1/2022 Go to the issue