Top

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Published in:

01-08-2008 | original article

Mortality Rate Associated with 56 Consecutive Esophagectomies Performed at a “Low-Volume” Hospital: is Procedure Volume as Important as We are Trying to Make it?

Authors: Brian Santin, Aaron Kulwicki, Phillip Price

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 8/2008

Abstract

Background

Esophagectomy procedures have been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recent articles in the literature have focused on the relationship between operative volume and the rates of mortality and morbidity in association with esophagectomy. The common theme among these publications is the statistically significant correlation between high-volume centers (typically defined as at least 10 esophagectomies per year) and lower mortality rates. The authors hypothesized that an individual surgeon’s expertise with the various esophagectomy procedures would better correlate to mortality rates than the absolute number performed in an institution per year.

Study Design

The study involved a retrospective cohort of a single surgeon over a 7-year period (August 17, 1999–December 23, 2006). Selection criteria included all patients who had undergone a transhiatal esophagectomy, transabdominal with diaphragmatic split esophagectomy, or Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy procedure by a single surgeon (PP) during the specified time period. The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality and postoperative complications.

Results

Over the 7-year study period, 56 esophagectomies were performed (average, eight per year). The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 48% (27/56) and 3.57% (2/56), respectively.

Conclusions

If low-volume esophagectomy centers are to be defined in the literature as completing <10 procedures per year, then these data represent such an institution. While several authors have demonstrated a correlation between lower mortality rates and high-volume esophagectomy hospitals, our results support surgeon experience as potentially being more significant than absolute number of procedures performed in an institution per year.

Alanezi K, Urschel J. Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;10:71–75.PubMed

Atkins B, Shah A, Hutcheson K, Mangum J, Pappas T, Harpole D, et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1170–1176.PubMedCrossRef

Begg C, Cramer L, Hoskins W, Brennan M. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998;280:1747–1751.PubMedCrossRef

Berger A, Scott W, Freedman G, Konski A, Weiner L, Cheng J, et al. Morbidity and mortality are not increased after induction chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 2205;32:16–20.CrossRef

Cense H, Lagarde S, Jong K, Omloo J, Busch O, Henny Ch , et al. Association of no epidural analgesia with postoperative morbidity and mortality after transthoracic esophageal cancer resection. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:395–400.PubMedCrossRef

Gockel I, Exner C, Junginger T. Morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: a risk analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2005;3:37.PubMedCrossRef

Hulscher J, Tijssen J, Obertop H, van Lanschot J. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:306–313.PubMedCrossRef

Law S, Wong K, Kwok K, Chu K, Wong J. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240:791–800.PubMedCrossRef

Martin L, Swisher S, Hofstetter W, Correa A, Mehran R, Rice D, et al. Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality. Ann Surg 2005;242:392–402.PubMed

10.

Marton S, Szakmany T, Papp A, Cseke L, Horvath P. Does transthoracic compared to transhiatal resection alter the early postoperative course of oesophagectomy? Dis Esophagus 2005;18:155–159.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Michelet P, D’Journo X, Roch A, Papazian L, Ragni J, Thomas P, et al. Perioperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: influence of thoracic epidural analgesia. Chest 2005;128:3461–3466.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Portale G, Hagen J, Peters J, Chan L, DeMeester S, Gandamihardja T, et al. Modern 5-year survival of respectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:588–596.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, Bailey S, Neumayer L, Pappas T, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1114–1120.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan M, Khan Z, Rahamim J. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:3–7.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Metzger R, Bollschweiler E, Vallbohmer D, Maish M, DeMeester T, Holscher A. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? Dis Esophagus 2004;17:310–314.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Dimick J, Wainess R, Upchurch G, Iannettoni M, Orringer M. National trends in outcomes for esophageal resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:212–218.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Pinotti H, Ellenbogen G, Zilberstein B. Esophagectomy by cervico abdominal approach: incision of diaphragm and transmediastinal extrapleural dissection. Chir Gastroenterol 1978;12:223–232.

18.

Pinotti H, Zilberstein B, Pollara W. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:345–346.

19.

Peracchia A, Bardini R. Total esophagectomy without thoracotomy: results of a European questionnaire (GEEMO). Int Surg 1986;71:171–175.PubMed

20.

Steyerberg E, Neville B, Koppert L, Lemmens V, Tilanus H, Coebergh JW, et al. Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4277–4284.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Birkmeyer J, Stukel T, Siewers A, Goodney P, Wennberg D, Lucas F. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117–2127.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Mortality Rate Associated with 56 Consecutive Esophagectomies Performed at a “Low-Volume” Hospital: is Procedure Volume as Important as We are Trying to Make it?
Authors: Brian Santin
Aaron Kulwicki
Phillip Price
Publication date: 01-08-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0550-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Mortality Rate Associated with 56 Consecutive Esophagectomies Performed at a “Low-Volume” Hospital: is Procedure Volume as Important as We are Trying to Make it?

Abstract

Background

Study Design

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Study Design

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Comparative Study on Three Types of Alimentary Reconstruction After Total Gastrectomy

Small Bowel Volvulus Diagnosed by the CT “Whirl Sign”

The Natural History of Diverticulitis: Implications for Elective Surgery

Serotonin Signaling in Diverticular Disease

Improved Reflux Monitoring in the Acute Gastroesophageal Reflux Porcine Model Using Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Measurement

Acute Diverticulitis of the Left Colon: Value of the Initial CT and Timing of Elective Colectomy