Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2016

Open Access 01-09-2016 | Original Article

Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Authors: Erwin Woff, Alain Hendlisz, Camilo Garcia, Amelie Deleporte, Thierry Delaunoit, Raphaël Maréchal, Stéphane Holbrechts, Marc Van den Eynde, Gauthier Demolin, Irina Vierasu, Renaud Lhommel, Namur Gauthier, Thomas Guiot, Lieveke Ameye, Patrick Flamen

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The introduction of targeted drugs has had a significant impact on the approach to assessing tumour response. These drugs often induce a rapid cytostatic effect associated with a less pronounced and slower tumoural volume reduction, thereby impairing the correlation between the absence of tumour shrinkage and the patient’s unlikelihood of benefit. The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of early metabolic response (mR) evaluation after one cycle, and its interlesional heterogeneity to a later metabolic and morphological response assessment performed after three cycles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with combined sorafenib and capecitabine.

Methods

This substudy was performed within the framework of a wider prospective multicenter study on the predictive value of early FDG PET-CT response assessment (SoMore study). A lesion-based response analysis was performed, including all measurable lesions identified on the baseline PET. On a per-patient basis, a descriptive 4-class response categorization was applied based upon the presence and proportion of non-responding lesions. For dichotomic response comparison, all patients with at least one resistant lesion were classified as non-responding.

Results

On baseline FDG PET-CT, 124 measurable “target” lesions were identified in 38 patients. Early mR assessments showed 18 patients (47 %) without treatment resistant lesions and 12 patients (32 %) with interlesional response heterogeneity. The NPV and PPV of early mR were 85 % (35/41) and 84 % (70/83), respectively, on a per-lesion basis and 95 % (19/20) and 72 % (13/18), respectively, on a dichotomized per-patient basis.

Conclusions

Early mR assessment performed after one cycle of sorafenib-capecitabine in mCRC is highly predictive of non-response at a standard response assessment time. The high NPV (95 %) of early mR could be useful as the basis for early treatment discontinuation or adaptation to spare patients from exposure to non-effective drugs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014;136:359–86.CrossRef Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014;136:359–86.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:303–12.CrossRefPubMed Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:303–12.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Strumberg D, Scheulen ME, Schultheis B, Richly H, Frost A, Büchert M, et al. Regorafenib (BAY 73–4506) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase I study. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1722–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Strumberg D, Scheulen ME, Schultheis B, Richly H, Frost A, Büchert M, et al. Regorafenib (BAY 73–4506) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase I study. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1722–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Mross K, Frost A, Steinbild S, Hedbom S, Büchert M, Fasol U, et al. A phase I dose–escalation study of regorafenib (BAY 73–4506), an inhibitor of oncogenic, angiogenic, and stromal kinases, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2658–67.CrossRefPubMed Mross K, Frost A, Steinbild S, Hedbom S, Büchert M, Fasol U, et al. A phase I dose–escalation study of regorafenib (BAY 73–4506), an inhibitor of oncogenic, angiogenic, and stromal kinases, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2658–67.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Van den Abbeele AD. The lessons of GIST--PET and PET/CT: a new paradigm for imaging. Oncologist. 2008;13:8–13.CrossRefPubMed Van den Abbeele AD. The lessons of GIST--PET and PET/CT: a new paradigm for imaging. Oncologist. 2008;13:8–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hendlisz A, Golfinopoulos V, Garcia C, Covas A, Emonts P, Ameye L, et al. Serial FDG–PET/CT for early outcome prediction in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1687–93.CrossRefPubMed Hendlisz A, Golfinopoulos V, Garcia C, Covas A, Emonts P, Ameye L, et al. Serial FDG–PET/CT for early outcome prediction in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1687–93.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference de Geus-Oei LF, van Laarhoven HWM, Visser EP, Hermsen R, van Hoorn BA, Kamm YJL, et al. Chemotherapy response evaluation with FDG-PET in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:348–52.CrossRefPubMed de Geus-Oei LF, van Laarhoven HWM, Visser EP, Hermsen R, van Hoorn BA, Kamm YJL, et al. Chemotherapy response evaluation with FDG-PET in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:348–52.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hendlisz A, Deleporte A, Vandeputte C, Charette N, Paesmans M, Guiot T, et al. Regorafenib assessment in refractory advanced colorectal cancer: RegARd-C study protocol. BMJ Open. 2015;5, e007189.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hendlisz A, Deleporte A, Vandeputte C, Charette N, Paesmans M, Guiot T, et al. Regorafenib assessment in refractory advanced colorectal cancer: RegARd-C study protocol. BMJ Open. 2015;5, e007189.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Engelmann BE, Loft A, Kjaer A, Nielsen HJ, Gerds TA, von Benzon E, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and biomarkers for early treatment response evaluation in metastatic colon cancer. Oncologist. 2014;19:164–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Engelmann BE, Loft A, Kjaer A, Nielsen HJ, Gerds TA, von Benzon E, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and biomarkers for early treatment response evaluation in metastatic colon cancer. Oncologist. 2014;19:164–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Liu FY, Yen TC, Wang JY, Yang TS. Early prediction by 18F-FDG PET/CT for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving third-line cetuximab-based therapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:200–5.CrossRefPubMed Liu FY, Yen TC, Wang JY, Yang TS. Early prediction by 18F-FDG PET/CT for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving third-line cetuximab-based therapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:200–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Desar IME, van Herpen CML, van Laarhoven HWM, Barentsz JO, Oyen WJG, van der Graaf WTA. Beyond RECIST: molecular and functional imaging techniques for evaluation of response to targeted therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:309–21.CrossRefPubMed Desar IME, van Herpen CML, van Laarhoven HWM, Barentsz JO, Oyen WJG, van der Graaf WTA. Beyond RECIST: molecular and functional imaging techniques for evaluation of response to targeted therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:309–21.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Vriens D, de Geus LF. Tailoring therapy in colorectal cancer by PET-CT. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;53:224–44.PubMed Vriens D, de Geus LF. Tailoring therapy in colorectal cancer by PET-CT. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;53:224–44.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Skougaard K, Johannesen HH, Nielsen D, Schou JV, Jensen BV, Høgdall EVS, et al. CT versus FDG‐PET/CT response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab. Cancer Med. 2014;3:1294–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Skougaard K, Johannesen HH, Nielsen D, Schou JV, Jensen BV, Høgdall EVS, et al. CT versus FDG‐PET/CT response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab. Cancer Med. 2014;3:1294–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Hendlisz A, Deleporte A, Delaunoit T, Maréchal R, Peeters M, Holbrechts S, et al. The prognostic significance of metabolic response heterogeneity in metastatic colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0138341.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hendlisz A, Deleporte A, Delaunoit T, Maréchal R, Peeters M, Holbrechts S, et al. The prognostic significance of metabolic response heterogeneity in metastatic colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0138341.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Buvat I, Necib H, Garcia C, Wagner A, Vanderlinden B, Emonts P, et al. Lesion-based detection of early chemosensitivity using serial static FDG PET/CT in metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1628–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buvat I, Necib H, Garcia C, Wagner A, Vanderlinden B, Emonts P, et al. Lesion-based detection of early chemosensitivity using serial static FDG PET/CT in metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1628–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Deleporte A, Hendlisz A, Garcia C, Delaunoit T. SoMore trial: early metabolic response assessment of a sorafenib (SOR) and capecitabine (CAP) combination in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32 Suppl 3. Deleporte A, Hendlisz A, Garcia C, Delaunoit T. SoMore trial: early metabolic response assessment of a sorafenib (SOR) and capecitabine (CAP) combination in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32 Suppl 3.
17.
go back to reference Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649.CrossRefPubMed Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1:122S–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1:122S–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1773–82.CrossRefPubMed Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1773–82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Dimitrakopoulou A. Prognostic aspects of 18F-FDG PET kinetics in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1480–7. Dimitrakopoulou A. Prognostic aspects of 18F-FDG PET kinetics in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1480–7.
21.
go back to reference Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Mueller SP, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the international conference on malignant lymphomas imaging working group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3048–58.CrossRefPubMed Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Mueller SP, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the international conference on malignant lymphomas imaging working group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3048–58.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–67.CrossRefPubMed Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–67.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Stroobants S, Goeminne J, Seegers M, Dimitrijevic S, Dupont P, Nuyts J, et al. 18FDG-positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec®). Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:2012–20.CrossRefPubMed Stroobants S, Goeminne J, Seegers M, Dimitrijevic S, Dupont P, Nuyts J, et al. 18FDG-positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec®). Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:2012–20.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;42:328–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;42:328–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Bender H, Bangard N, Metten N, Bangard M, Mezger J, Schomburg A, et al. Possible role of FDG-PET in the early prediction of therapy outcome in liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Hybridoma. 1999;18:87–91.CrossRefPubMed Bender H, Bangard N, Metten N, Bangard M, Mezger J, Schomburg A, et al. Possible role of FDG-PET in the early prediction of therapy outcome in liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Hybridoma. 1999;18:87–91.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bystrom P, Berglund A, Garske U, Jacobsson H, Sundin A, Nygren P, et al. Early prediction of response to first-line chemotherapy by sequential [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1057–61.CrossRefPubMed Bystrom P, Berglund A, Garske U, Jacobsson H, Sundin A, Nygren P, et al. Early prediction of response to first-line chemotherapy by sequential [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1057–61.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Arslan C, Kilickap S. FDG-PET: for early prediction of response to the first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer? Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1149–50.CrossRefPubMed Arslan C, Kilickap S. FDG-PET: for early prediction of response to the first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer? Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1149–50.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Whiteford MH, Whiteford HM, Yee LF, Ogunbiyi OA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, et al. Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:759–70.CrossRefPubMed Whiteford MH, Whiteford HM, Yee LF, Ogunbiyi OA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, et al. Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:759–70.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Maisonobe J, Garcia CA, Necib H, Vanderlinden B, Hendlisz A, Flamen P, et al. Comparison of PET metabolic indices for the early assessment of tumour response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated by polychemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:166–74.CrossRefPubMed Maisonobe J, Garcia CA, Necib H, Vanderlinden B, Hendlisz A, Flamen P, et al. Comparison of PET metabolic indices for the early assessment of tumour response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated by polychemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:166–74.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Findlay M, Young H, Cunningham D. Noninvasive monitoring of tumor metabolism using fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer liver metastases: correlation with tumor response to fluorouracil. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:700–8.PubMed Findlay M, Young H, Cunningham D. Noninvasive monitoring of tumor metabolism using fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer liver metastases: correlation with tumor response to fluorouracil. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:700–8.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Wade AA, Scott JA, Kuter I, Fischman AJ. Flare response in 18 F-Fluoride Ion PET bone scanning. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1783–6.CrossRef Wade AA, Scott JA, Kuter I, Fischman AJ. Flare response in 18 F-Fluoride Ion PET bone scanning. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1783–6.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Aliaga A, Rousseau JA, Cadorette J, Croteau É. A small animal positron emission tomography study of the effect of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy on the uptake of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18] fluoro-D-glucose in murine models of breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2007;9:144–50.CrossRefPubMed Aliaga A, Rousseau JA, Cadorette J, Croteau É. A small animal positron emission tomography study of the effect of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy on the uptake of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18] fluoro-D-glucose in murine models of breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2007;9:144–50.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Weber WA. Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. J Nucl Med. 2005;6:983–95. Weber WA. Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. J Nucl Med. 2005;6:983–95.
34.
go back to reference Basu S, Nair N. Is it time to incorporate quantitative functional imaging data, FDG PET in particular, into the response evaluation criteria in solid tumours? Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:413–6.CrossRefPubMed Basu S, Nair N. Is it time to incorporate quantitative functional imaging data, FDG PET in particular, into the response evaluation criteria in solid tumours? Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:413–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Basu S, Alavi A. Defining co-related parameters between ‘metabolic’ flare and ‘clinical’, ‘biochemical’, and ‘osteoblastic’ flare and establishing guidelines for assessing response to treatment in cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:441–3.CrossRefPubMed Basu S, Alavi A. Defining co-related parameters between ‘metabolic’ flare and ‘clinical’, ‘biochemical’, and ‘osteoblastic’ flare and establishing guidelines for assessing response to treatment in cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:441–3.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Wolchok JD, Hoos A, O’Day S, Weber JS, Hamid O, Lebbe C, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7412–20.CrossRefPubMed Wolchok JD, Hoos A, O’Day S, Weber JS, Hamid O, Lebbe C, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7412–20.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Troiani T, Martinelli E, Napolitano S, Morgillo F, Belli G, Cioffi L, et al. Molecular aspects of resistance to biological and Non-biological drugs and strategies to overcome resistance in colorectal cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21(14):1639–53.CrossRefPubMed Troiani T, Martinelli E, Napolitano S, Morgillo F, Belli G, Cioffi L, et al. Molecular aspects of resistance to biological and Non-biological drugs and strategies to overcome resistance in colorectal cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21(14):1639–53.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601–9.CrossRefPubMed Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
Authors
Erwin Woff
Alain Hendlisz
Camilo Garcia
Amelie Deleporte
Thierry Delaunoit
Raphaël Maréchal
Stéphane Holbrechts
Marc Van den Eynde
Gauthier Demolin
Irina Vierasu
Renaud Lhommel
Namur Gauthier
Thomas Guiot
Lieveke Ameye
Patrick Flamen
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3365-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2016 Go to the issue