Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Symposium: Fractures of the Acetabulum

Modifier 22 for Acetabular Fractures in Morbidly Obese Patients: Does It Affect Reimbursement?

Authors: Patrick F. Bergin, MD, Christopher Kneip, MD, Christine Pierce, MD, Stephen T. Hendrix, MD, Scott E. Porter, MD, Matthew L. Graves, MD, George V. Russell, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Modifier 22 in the American Medical Association’s Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) book is a billing code for professional fees used to reflect an increased amount of skill, time, and work required to complete a procedure. There is little disagreement that using this code in the setting of surgery for acetabulum fractures in the obese patient is appropriate; however, to our knowledge, the degree to which payers value this additional level of complexity has not been determined.

Questions/purposes

We asked whether (1) the use of Modifier 22 increased reimbursements in morbidly obese patients and (2) there was any difference between private insurance and governmental payer sources in treatment of Modifier 22.

Methods

Over a 4-year period, we requested immediate adjudication with payers when using Modifier 22 for morbidly obese patients with acetabular fractures. We provided payers with evidence of the increased time and effort required in treating this population. Reimbursements were calculated for morbidly obese and nonmorbidly obese patients. Of the 346 patients we reviewed, 57 had additional CPT® codes or modifiers appended to their charges and were excluded, leaving 289 patients. Thirty (10%) were morbidly obese and were billed with Modifier 22. Fifty-three (18%) were insured by our largest private insurer and 69 (24%) by governmental programs (Medicare/Medicaid). Eight privately insured patients (15%) and seven governmentally insured patients (10%) were morbidly obese and were billed with Modifier 22. For our primary question, we compared reimbursement rates between patients with and without Modifier 22 for obesity within the 289 patients. We then performed the same comparison for the 53 privately insured patients and the 69 governmentally insured patients.

Results

Overall, there was no change in mean reimbursement when using Modifier 22 in morbidly obese patients, compared to nonmorbidly obese patients (USD 2126 versus USD 2149, p < 0.94). There was also no difference in mean reimbursements with Modifier 22 in either the privately insured patients (USD 3445 versus USD 2929, p = 0.16) or the governmentally insured patients (USD 1367 versus USD 1224, p = 0.83).

Conclusions

Despite educating payers on the increased complexity and time needed to deal with morbidly obese patients with acetabular fractures, we have not seen an increased reimbursement in this challenging patient population. This could be a disincentive for many centers to treat these challenging injuries. Further efforts are needed to convince government payer sources to increase compensation in these situations.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, economic and decision analyses. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Medical Association. Current Procedural Terminology, CPT 2009 Professional Edition. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2008. American Medical Association. Current Procedural Terminology, CPT 2009 Professional Edition. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2008.
2.
go back to reference Beksac B, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Salvati EA. Thromboembolic disease after total hip arthroplasty: who is at risk? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:211–224.PubMedCrossRef Beksac B, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Salvati EA. Thromboembolic disease after total hip arthroplasty: who is at risk? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:211–224.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bordini B, Stea S, Cremonini S, Viceconti M, De Palma R, Toni A. Relationship between obesity and early failure of total knee prostheses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:29.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Bordini B, Stea S, Cremonini S, Viceconti M, De Palma R, Toni A. Relationship between obesity and early failure of total knee prostheses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:29.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Dowsey MM, Choong PF. Obese diabetic patients are at substantial risk for deep infection after primary TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1577–1581.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Dowsey MM, Choong PF. Obese diabetic patients are at substantial risk for deep infection after primary TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1577–1581.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum SM, Griffin WL, Mason JB, McCoy TH. The obesity epidemic: its effect on total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 suppl 2):71–76.PubMedCrossRef Fehring TK, Odum SM, Griffin WL, Mason JB, McCoy TH. The obesity epidemic: its effect on total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 suppl 2):71–76.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Filler BC. Coding basics for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:105–113.PubMed Filler BC. Coding basics for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:105–113.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Halenar BF. CPT codes: get ready for 2008. Med Econ. 2007;84:29–30, 32–23. Halenar BF. CPT codes: get ready for 2008. Med Econ. 2007;84:29–30, 32–23.
8.
go back to reference Herbst MR. CPT and HCPCS coding: the modifier fiasco. Health Manag Technol. 1998;19:74, 73. Herbst MR. CPT and HCPCS coding: the modifier fiasco. Health Manag Technol. 1998;19:74, 73.
9.
go back to reference Jamsen E, Nevalainen P, Eskelinen A, Huotari K, Kalliovalkama J, Moilanen T. Obesity, diabetes, and preoperative hyperglycemia as predictors of periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center analysis of 7181 primary hip and knee replacements for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e101.PubMedCrossRef Jamsen E, Nevalainen P, Eskelinen A, Huotari K, Kalliovalkama J, Moilanen T. Obesity, diabetes, and preoperative hyperglycemia as predictors of periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center analysis of 7181 primary hip and knee replacements for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e101.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Karunakar MA, Shah SN, Jerabek S. Body mass index as a predictor of complications after operative treatment of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1498–1502.PubMedCrossRef Karunakar MA, Shah SN, Jerabek S. Body mass index as a predictor of complications after operative treatment of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1498–1502.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lander R, Martin V. Your guide to better coding. Med Econ. 2008;85:34–39.PubMed Lander R, Martin V. Your guide to better coding. Med Econ. 2008;85:34–39.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Leet AI, Pichard CP, Ain MC. Surgical treatment of femoral fractures in obese children: does excessive body weight increase the rate of complications? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2609–2613.PubMedCrossRef Leet AI, Pichard CP, Ain MC. Surgical treatment of femoral fractures in obese children: does excessive body weight increase the rate of complications? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2609–2613.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference McCalden RW, Charron KD, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Naudie DD. Does morbid obesity affect the outcome of total hip replacement? An analysis of 3290 THRs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:321–325.PubMedCrossRef McCalden RW, Charron KD, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Naudie DD. Does morbid obesity affect the outcome of total hip replacement? An analysis of 3290 THRs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:321–325.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Parvizi J, Trousdale RT, Sarr MG. Total joint arthroplasty in patients surgically treated for morbid obesity. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:1003–1008.PubMedCrossRef Parvizi J, Trousdale RT, Sarr MG. Total joint arthroplasty in patients surgically treated for morbid obesity. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:1003–1008.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Patel VP, Walsh M, Sehgal B, Preston C, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE. Factors associated with prolonged wound drainage after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:33–38.PubMedCrossRef Patel VP, Walsh M, Sehgal B, Preston C, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE. Factors associated with prolonged wound drainage after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:33–38.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Porter SE, Graves ML, Qin Z, Russell GV. Operative experience of pelvic fractures in the obese. Obes Surg. 2008;18:702–708.PubMedCrossRef Porter SE, Graves ML, Qin Z, Russell GV. Operative experience of pelvic fractures in the obese. Obes Surg. 2008;18:702–708.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Porter SE, Russell GV, Dews RC, Qin Z, Woodall J Jr, Graves ML. Complications of acetabular fracture surgery in morbidly obese patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:589–594.PubMedCrossRef Porter SE, Russell GV, Dews RC, Qin Z, Woodall J Jr, Graves ML. Complications of acetabular fracture surgery in morbidly obese patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:589–594.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rajgopal V, Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH. The impact of morbid obesity on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:795–800.PubMedCrossRef Rajgopal V, Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH. The impact of morbid obesity on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:795–800.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Metadata
Title
Modifier 22 for Acetabular Fractures in Morbidly Obese Patients: Does It Affect Reimbursement?
Authors
Patrick F. Bergin, MD
Christopher Kneip, MD
Christine Pierce, MD
Stephen T. Hendrix, MD
Scott E. Porter, MD
Matthew L. Graves, MD
George V. Russell, MD
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3639-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2014 Go to the issue