Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Commentary

Models of professional regulation: institutionalizing an agency relationship

Author: Carolyn Hughes Tuohy

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The regulation of medical practice can historically be understood as a second-level agency relationship whereby the state delegated authority to professional bodies to police the primary agency relationship between the individual physician and the patient. Borow, Levi and Glekin show how different national systems vary in the degree to which they insist on institutionally insulating the agency function from the promotion of private professional interests, and relate these variations to different models of the health care state. In fact these differences have even deeper roots in different “liberal” or “coordinated” varieties of capitalist political economies. Neither model is inherently more efficient than the other: what matters is the internal coherence or logic of these systems that conditions the expectations of actors in responding to particular challenges. The territory that Borow, Levi and Glekin have usefully mapped invites further exploration in this regard.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arrow KJ: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev. 1963, 53 (5): 941-973. Arrow KJ: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev. 1963, 53 (5): 941-973.
2.
go back to reference Tuohy CH: “Agency, contract and governance - shifting shapes of accountability in the health care arena. J Health Polit Pol Law. 2003, 28 (3): 195-215. 10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-195. reprinted in Rosen B, Israeli A and Shortell S (Eds): Accountability and Responsibility in Health Care: Issues in Addressing An Emerging Global Challenge. Singapore: World Scientific Press 2012, 91–114CrossRef Tuohy CH: “Agency, contract and governance - shifting shapes of accountability in the health care arena. J Health Polit Pol Law. 2003, 28 (3): 195-215. 10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-195. reprinted in Rosen B, Israeli A and Shortell S (Eds): Accountability and Responsibility in Health Care: Issues in Addressing An Emerging Global Challenge. Singapore: World Scientific Press 2012, 91–114CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Borow M, Levi B, Glekin M: Regulatory tasks of national medical associations - international comparison and the Israeli case. Isr J Health Pol Res. 2013, 2: 8-10.1186/2045-4015-2-8.CrossRef Borow M, Levi B, Glekin M: Regulatory tasks of national medical associations - international comparison and the Israeli case. Isr J Health Pol Res. 2013, 2: 8-10.1186/2045-4015-2-8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Moran M: Governing the Health Care State - A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany. 1999, Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press Moran M: Governing the Health Care State - A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany. 1999, Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press
5.
go back to reference Hall PA, Soskice D: Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. 2001, New York: Oxford University PressCrossRef Hall PA, Soskice D: Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. 2001, New York: Oxford University PressCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Soskice DW: Varieties of capitalism and cross-national gender differences. Soc Pol Int Stud Gender State Soc. 2005, 12 (2): 170-179. 10.1093/sp/jxi010. Soskice DW: Varieties of capitalism and cross-national gender differences. Soc Pol Int Stud Gender State Soc. 2005, 12 (2): 170-179. 10.1093/sp/jxi010.
7.
go back to reference Vogel D: National Styles of Regulation - Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. 1986, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press Vogel D: National Styles of Regulation - Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. 1986, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
8.
go back to reference Schut FT: Health care reform in the Netherlands - balancing corporatism, etatism, and market mechanisms. J Health Polit Pol Law. 2005, 20 (3): 615-652.CrossRef Schut FT: Health care reform in the Netherlands - balancing corporatism, etatism, and market mechanisms. J Health Polit Pol Law. 2005, 20 (3): 615-652.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference OECD: Health Care Systems. Paris: Efficiency and Policy Settings, 10.1787/9789264094901-en. OECD Publishing OECD: Health Care Systems. Paris: Efficiency and Policy Settings, 10.1787/9789264094901-en. OECD Publishing
10.
go back to reference Report of the committee of inquiry into the regulation of the medical profession. Cmnd. 5: 1975-6018. Report of the committee of inquiry into the regulation of the medical profession. Cmnd. 5: 1975-6018.
11.
go back to reference Crouch C, Streek W, Boyer R, Amable B, Hall PA, Jackson G: Dialogue on ‘Institutional complementarity and political economy. Soc Econ Rev. 2005, 3: 359-382. 10.1093/SER/mwi015.CrossRef Crouch C, Streek W, Boyer R, Amable B, Hall PA, Jackson G: Dialogue on ‘Institutional complementarity and political economy. Soc Econ Rev. 2005, 3: 359-382. 10.1093/SER/mwi015.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Models of professional regulation: institutionalizing an agency relationship
Author
Carolyn Hughes Tuohy
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-2-10

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2013 Go to the issue