Skip to main content
Top
Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Mitral Valve Replacement | Original Article

Early outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthesis in Japanese (MITRAL VIV study): a four-case series

Authors: Kizuku Yamashita, Satsuki Fukushima, Yusuke Shimahara, Atsushi Okada, Makoto Amaki, Hideaki Kanzaki, Chisato Izumi, Satoshi Yasuda, Junjiro Kobayashi, Tomoyuki Fujita

Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The mitral valve-in-valve procedure has been performed in the world. However, the early clinical outcomes in Japan remain unclear. Hence, we investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy in high-risk Japanese patients.

Methods

In May 2017, we launched the present clinical study of the mitral valve-in-valve procedure (MITRAL VIV study). The study enrolled four patients (three women; age range 69–85 years) with severe mitral regurgitation due to a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis. The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 8.8 (range 8.4–9.8)%.

Results

In all patients, the mitral valve-in-valve procedure was successfully performed via a transapical approach at the initial attempt. The median grade of mitral insufficiency improved from grade 4 (range 3–4) to grade 1 (range 0–1) at days 7 and 30. The mean mitral pressure gradient of the median value changed from 7.0 (range 5.0–8.0) mmHg to 5.0 (range 5.0–9.5) mmHg at 7 days and 6.2 (range 4.0–11.0) mmHg at 30 days. The median New York Heart Association functional class improved from 2 (range 2–3) to 1 (range 1–3) at day 7 and to 1 (range 1–2) at day 30. We performed a bit deep implantation intentionally to avoid left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in one patient with a small aorto-mitral-annular angle. Neither mortality nor severe complications were observed at the last follow-up (range 207–513 days).

Conclusions

In our experience, the safe mitral valve-in-valve procedure was feasible with cautious procedures.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cheung A, Webb JG, Barbanti M, Freeman M, Binder RK, Thompson C, et al. 5-year experience with transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1759–66.CrossRef Cheung A, Webb JG, Barbanti M, Freeman M, Binder RK, Thompson C, et al. 5-year experience with transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1759–66.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yoon SH, Whisenant BK, Bleiziffer S, Delgado V, Dhoble A, Schofer N, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:441–51.CrossRef Yoon SH, Whisenant BK, Bleiziffer S, Delgado V, Dhoble A, Schofer N, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:441–51.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stone GW, Adams DH, Abraham WT, Kappetein AP, Généreux P, Vranckx P, et al. Clinical trial design principles and endpoint definitions for transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement: part 2: endpoint definitions: a consensus document from the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1878–91.CrossRef Stone GW, Adams DH, Abraham WT, Kappetein AP, Généreux P, Vranckx P, et al. Clinical trial design principles and endpoint definitions for transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement: part 2: endpoint definitions: a consensus document from the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1878–91.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bapat V. Valve-in-valve apps: why and how they were developed and how to use them. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(Suppl U):U44–51.CrossRef Bapat V. Valve-in-valve apps: why and how they were developed and how to use them. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(Suppl U):U44–51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Papadopoulos N, Ilioska P, Fichtlscherer S, Lehmann R, Beiras Fernandez A, Moritz A, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with previous cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:37–42.CrossRef Papadopoulos N, Ilioska P, Fichtlscherer S, Lehmann R, Beiras Fernandez A, Moritz A, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with previous cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:37–42.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dvir D, Webb J. Mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring: technical aspects and procedural outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(Y):Y93–6.CrossRef Dvir D, Webb J. Mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring: technical aspects and procedural outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(Y):Y93–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bapat V, Attia R, Redwood S, Hancock J, Wilson K, Young C, et al. Use of transcatheter heart valves for a valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic bioprosthesis: technical considerations and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1372–9.CrossRef Bapat V, Attia R, Redwood S, Hancock J, Wilson K, Young C, et al. Use of transcatheter heart valves for a valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerated aortic bioprosthesis: technical considerations and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1372–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cerillo AG, Gasbarri T, Celi S, Murzi M, Trianni G, Ravani M, et al. Transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed mitral bioprostheses: gradient, symptoms, and functional status in 18 high-risk patients up to 5 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1289–95.CrossRef Cerillo AG, Gasbarri T, Celi S, Murzi M, Trianni G, Ravani M, et al. Transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed mitral bioprostheses: gradient, symptoms, and functional status in 18 high-risk patients up to 5 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1289–95.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bapat V, Pirone F, Kapetanakis S, Rajani R, Niederer S. Factors influencing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction following a mitral valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring procedure, part 1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:747–60.CrossRef Bapat V, Pirone F, Kapetanakis S, Rajani R, Niederer S. Factors influencing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction following a mitral valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring procedure, part 1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:747–60.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yoon SH, Bleiziffer S, Latib A, Eschenbach L, Ancona M, Vincent F, et al. Predictors of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:182–93.CrossRef Yoon SH, Bleiziffer S, Latib A, Eschenbach L, Ancona M, Vincent F, et al. Predictors of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:182–93.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Capretti G, Urena M, Himbert D, Brochet E, Goublaire C, Verdonk C, et al. Valve thrombosis after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1814–5.CrossRef Capretti G, Urena M, Himbert D, Brochet E, Goublaire C, Verdonk C, et al. Valve thrombosis after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1814–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Loardi C, Mirza A, Candolfi P, Marchand M, et al. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2004–11.CrossRef Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Loardi C, Mirza A, Candolfi P, Marchand M, et al. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2004–11.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sezai A, Osaka S, Yaoita H, Ishii Y, Arimoto M, Hata H, et al. Long-term outcome of prosthetic valve replacement in Japanese patients aged 65 years or older: are guidelines for prosthetic valve selection based on overseas data appropriate for Japanese patients? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21:254–60.CrossRef Sezai A, Osaka S, Yaoita H, Ishii Y, Arimoto M, Hata H, et al. Long-term outcome of prosthetic valve replacement in Japanese patients aged 65 years or older: are guidelines for prosthetic valve selection based on overseas data appropriate for Japanese patients? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21:254–60.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nakazato T, Hata H, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Yoshikawa Y, Saito S, et al. Midterm clinical outcomes of the St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Circ J. 2018;83:110–6.CrossRef Nakazato T, Hata H, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Yoshikawa Y, Saito S, et al. Midterm clinical outcomes of the St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Circ J. 2018;83:110–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dvir D. Transseptal instead of transapical valve implantation: making mitral great again? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1175–7.CrossRef Dvir D. Transseptal instead of transapical valve implantation: making mitral great again? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1175–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Eleid MF, Cabalka AK, Williams MR, Whisenant BK, Alli OO, Fam N, et al. Percutaneous transvenous transseptal transcatheter valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic mitral valves, ring annuloplasty, and severe mitral annular calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1161–74.CrossRef Eleid MF, Cabalka AK, Williams MR, Whisenant BK, Alli OO, Fam N, et al. Percutaneous transvenous transseptal transcatheter valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic mitral valves, ring annuloplasty, and severe mitral annular calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1161–74.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthesis in Japanese (MITRAL VIV study): a four-case series
Authors
Kizuku Yamashita
Satsuki Fukushima
Yusuke Shimahara
Atsushi Okada
Makoto Amaki
Hideaki Kanzaki
Chisato Izumi
Satoshi Yasuda
Junjiro Kobayashi
Tomoyuki Fujita
Publication date
01-01-2020

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue