Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Miscarriage | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Euploid blastocysts implant irrespective of their morphology after NGS-(PGT-A) testing in advanced maternal age patients

Authors: X. Viñals Gonzalez, R. Odia, R. Naja, P. Serhal, W. Saab, S. Seshadri, J. Ben-Nagi

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Does blastocyst morphology following euploid elective single embryo transfer (eSET) after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) via next generation sequencing impact clinical outcome?

Methods

Two hundred ninety-six patients underwent PGT-A. Of 1549 blastocysts, 1410 blastocysts had a conclusive result after PGT-A and were included for analysis. An eSET policy was followed in a frozen embryo replacement cycle. A total of 179 euploid blastocysts were thawed and transferred. Clinical outcomes were categorized in four different embryo quality groups: excellent, good, average and poor.

Results

Euploidy rate was 19/36 (52.7%, 95% CI 37–68), 199/470 (42.3%, 95% CI 38–47), 156/676 (23.0%, 95% CI 20–26) and 39/228 (17.1%, 95% CI 13–23) in the excellent, good, average and poor quality blastocyst groups, respectively. Fitted logistic regression analysis taking into account the following covariables: female, age, embryo chromosomal status and day of blastocyst development/biopsy showed that morphology was predictive of the comprehensive chromosome screening result (p < 0.05). A logistic regression analysis was also performed on clinical outcomes taking into account the effect of blastocyst morphology and day of blastocyst development/biopsy. None of the parameters were shown to be significant, suggesting morphology and day of blastocyst development/biopsy do not reduce the competence of euploid embryos (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

After eSET, implantation rate was 80–86%; live birth rate per embryo transfer was 60–73% and clinical miscarriage rate was found to be < 10% and were not significantly affected by the embryo morphology. Results are concordant with those reported when using aCGH and highlights the competence of poor-quality euploid embryos.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):520–4.CrossRefPubMed Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):520–4.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1270–83.CrossRef Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1270–83.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ben-Nagi J, Wells D, Doye K, Loutradi K, Exeter H, Drew E, et al. Karyomapping: a single centre’s experience from application of methodology to ongoing pregnancy and live-birth rates. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:264–71.CrossRefPubMed Ben-Nagi J, Wells D, Doye K, Loutradi K, Exeter H, Drew E, et al. Karyomapping: a single centre’s experience from application of methodology to ongoing pregnancy and live-birth rates. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:264–71.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–81.CrossRefPubMed Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–81.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: coticchio.biogenesi@grupposandonato.itThe Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(5):494–510.CrossRef ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: coticchio.biogenesi@grupposandonato.itThe Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(5):494–510.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):100–7.e1.CrossRefPubMed Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):100–7.e1.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Daphnis DD, Goodall NN, Mania A, Griffiths T, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(2):480–90.CrossRefPubMed Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Daphnis DD, Goodall NN, Mania A, Griffiths T, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(2):480–90.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11(3):307–11.CrossRefPubMed Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11(3):307–11.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Garrisi JG, Colls P, Ferry KM, Zheng X, Garrisi MG, Munne S. Effect of infertility, maternal age, and number of previous miscarriages on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):288–95.CrossRefPubMed Garrisi JG, Colls P, Ferry KM, Zheng X, Garrisi MG, Munne S. Effect of infertility, maternal age, and number of previous miscarriages on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):288–95.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Harton GL, Munne S, Surrey M, Grifo J, Kaplan B, McCulloh DH, et al. Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(6):1695–703.CrossRefPubMed Harton GL, Munne S, Surrey M, Grifo J, Kaplan B, McCulloh DH, et al. Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(6):1695–703.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, et al. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):675–80.CrossRefPubMed Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, et al. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):675–80.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Irani M, Reichman D, Robles A, Melnick A, Davis O, Zaninovic N, et al. Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(3):664–70.CrossRefPubMed Irani M, Reichman D, Robles A, Melnick A, Davis O, Zaninovic N, et al. Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(3):664–70.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Majumdar G, Majumdar A, Verma IC, Upadhyaya KC. Relationship between morphology, Euploidy and implantation potential of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017;10(1):49–57.PubMedPubMedCentral Majumdar G, Majumdar A, Verma IC, Upadhyaya KC. Relationship between morphology, Euploidy and implantation potential of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017;10(1):49–57.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2245–54.CrossRefPubMed Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2245–54.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Munne S, Chen S, Fischer J, Colls P, Zheng X, Stevens J, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(2):331–5.CrossRefPubMed Munne S, Chen S, Fischer J, Colls P, Zheng X, Stevens J, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(2):331–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Neal S, et al. Preimplantation gentic testing for aneuploidy is cost effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):896–904.CrossRefPubMed Neal S, et al. Preimplantation gentic testing for aneuploidy is cost effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):896–904.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F, Rodrigo L, Pehlivan T, Remohi J, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(1):182–8.CrossRefPubMed Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F, Rodrigo L, Pehlivan T, Remohi J, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(1):182–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Scott RT Jr, Franasiak JM, Forman EJ. Comprehensive chromosome screening with synchronous blastocyst transfer: time for a paradigm shift. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):660–1.CrossRefPubMed Scott RT Jr, Franasiak JM, Forman EJ. Comprehensive chromosome screening with synchronous blastocyst transfer: time for a paradigm shift. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):660–1.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Veeck L, Zaninovic N. Human blastocysts in vitro. In: Veeck L, Zaninovic N, editors. An atlas of human blastocysts. Boca Raton: Parthenon Publishing; 2009. p. 99–137. Veeck L, Zaninovic N. Human blastocysts in vitro. In: Veeck L, Zaninovic N, editors. An atlas of human blastocysts. Boca Raton: Parthenon Publishing; 2009. p. 99–137.
20.
go back to reference Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1685–95.CrossRefPubMed Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1685–95.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Euploid blastocysts implant irrespective of their morphology after NGS-(PGT-A) testing in advanced maternal age patients
Authors
X. Viñals Gonzalez
R. Odia
R. Naja
P. Serhal
W. Saab
S. Seshadri
J. Ben-Nagi
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Miscarriage
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01496-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 8/2019 Go to the issue