Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Article

Minimum 6 mm core length is strongly predictive for the presence of glandular tissue in transrectal prostate biopsy

Authors: Hasan Yilmaz, Seyfettin Ciftci, Murat Ustuner, Ufuk Yavuz, Ali Saribacak, Bahar Muezzinoglu, Ozdal Dillioglugil

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Prostate biopsy guidelines recommend that a prostate biopsy not containing glandular prostate tissue should be reported as inadequate. In the literature, there is a lack of any study that addresses the relationship between the length of biopsy cores and the absence of glandular prostate tissue. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a relationship exists between these parameters.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively evaluated 1,712 consecutive initial transrectal 12-core prostate biopsies. Individual cores were histologically categorized as glandular (benign or malignant) and non-glandular (rectal mucosa, periprostatic adipose tissue, prostatic or periprostatic fibromuscular tissue). Total number of evaluable cores ≤9, highly fragmented, incorrectly numbered or dried biopsies, patients with 5-α reductase inhibitory treatment were excluded.

Results

We analyzed remaining 1,584 patients; 41.7 % had adenocarcinoma. A total of 19,144 cores were sampled. Non-glandular cores were found significantly shorter than glandular cores (p < 0.0001). The percentages of non-glandular cores were significantly higher at the base, apex and lateral biopsy sites (p < 0.0001). We found a 6-mm cutoff value for accurate prediction of glandular sampling with 80.2 % sensitivity and 78.7 % specificity. The risk of non-glandular sampling increased 15-fold in cores ≤6 mm (OR 14.91, 95% CI 13.20–16.83, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Non-glandular sampling was directly associated with shorter core lengths. They were found significantly higher at the base, apex and lateral localizations. We found a 6-mm cutoff value for the prediction of non-glandular samples before the histologic evaluation. Below this value, the risk of non-glandular sampling increased 15-fold. We suggest it for prompt additional sampling during biopsy procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Van der Kwast T, Bubendorf L, Mazerolles C et al (2013) Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Virchows Arch 463(3):367–377CrossRefPubMed Van der Kwast T, Bubendorf L, Mazerolles C et al (2013) Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Virchows Arch 463(3):367–377CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Eskicorapci SY, Baydar DE, Akbal C et al (2004) An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 45(4):448–449CrossRef Eskicorapci SY, Baydar DE, Akbal C et al (2004) An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 45(4):448–449CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boccon-Gibod L, van der Kwast TH, Montironi R et al (2004) Handling and pathology reporting of prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 46(2):177–181CrossRefPubMed Boccon-Gibod L, van der Kwast TH, Montironi R et al (2004) Handling and pathology reporting of prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 46(2):177–181CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bertaccini A, Fandella A, Prayer-Galetti T et al (2007) Systematic development of clinical practice guidelines for prostate biopsies: a 3-year Italian project. Anticancer Res 27(1B):659–666PubMed Bertaccini A, Fandella A, Prayer-Galetti T et al (2007) Systematic development of clinical practice guidelines for prostate biopsies: a 3-year Italian project. Anticancer Res 27(1B):659–666PubMed
5.
go back to reference Iczkowski KA, Casella G, Seppala RJ et al (2002) Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 59(5):698–703CrossRefPubMed Iczkowski KA, Casella G, Seppala RJ et al (2002) Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 59(5):698–703CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Obek C, Doganca T, Erdal S et al (2012) Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters. J Urol 187(6):2051–2055CrossRefPubMed Obek C, Doganca T, Erdal S et al (2012) Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters. J Urol 187(6):2051–2055CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fiset PO, Aprikian A, Brimo F (2013) Length of prostate biopsy cores: does it impact cancer detection? Can J Urol 20(4):6848–6853PubMed Fiset PO, Aprikian A, Brimo F (2013) Length of prostate biopsy cores: does it impact cancer detection? Can J Urol 20(4):6848–6853PubMed
8.
go back to reference Mottet PJB N, Bellmunt J, Van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, van Casteren NJ, Cornford P, Joniau S, Mason MD, Matveev V, Van der Kwast TH, van der Poel H, Rouvière O, Wiegel T, Members of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Office (2014) Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. EAU Guidelines, 2014th edn. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, pp 184–355 Mottet PJB N, Bellmunt J, Van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, van Casteren NJ, Cornford P, Joniau S, Mason MD, Matveev V, Van der Kwast TH, van der Poel H, Rouvière O, Wiegel T, Members of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Office (2014) Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. EAU Guidelines, 2014th edn. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, pp 184–355
9.
go back to reference van der Kwast TH, Lopes C, Santonja C, Pihl CG, Neetens I, Martikainen P, Di Lollo S, Bubendorf L, Hoedemaeker RF, Members of the pathology committee of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate C (2003) Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies. J Clin Pathol 56(5):336–340PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed van der Kwast TH, Lopes C, Santonja C, Pihl CG, Neetens I, Martikainen P, Di Lollo S, Bubendorf L, Hoedemaeker RF, Members of the pathology committee of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate C (2003) Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies. J Clin Pathol 56(5):336–340PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Reis LO, Sanches BC, de Mendonca GB, Silva DM, Aguiar T, Menezes OP, Billis A (2014) Gleason underestimation is predicted by prostate biopsy core length. World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-014-1371-9 Reis LO, Sanches BC, de Mendonca GB, Silva DM, Aguiar T, Menezes OP, Billis A (2014) Gleason underestimation is predicted by prostate biopsy core length. World J Urol. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-014-1371-9
13.
go back to reference Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF (2008) Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J 50(3):419–430PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF (2008) Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J 50(3):419–430PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Minimum 6 mm core length is strongly predictive for the presence of glandular tissue in transrectal prostate biopsy
Authors
Hasan Yilmaz
Seyfettin Ciftci
Murat Ustuner
Ufuk Yavuz
Ali Saribacak
Bahar Muezzinoglu
Ozdal Dillioglugil
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1536-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

World Journal of Urology 11/2015 Go to the issue