Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Minimally Invasive Surgery | SAGES/EAES Official Publication

White paper: technology for surgical telementoring—SAGES Project 6 Technology Working Group

Authors: Etai M. Bogen, Christopher M. Schlachta, Todd Ponsky

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent advances in telecommunication technology and video conferencing systems have opened a new avenue for surgical instruction called “surgical telementoring.” This report from the Technology Working Group of the SAGES Project 6 Summit reviews the telementoring technology that currently exists and proposes recommendations for minimum technology requirements and future technology development. While also providing insight in regulatory considerations, this review offers what prospective surgical telementoring participants need to know about the underlying technology with a specific focus on safety, reliability, transmission quality, ease of use, and cost.

Methods

Content experts from around the world, in minimally invasive surgery, surgical mentoring and telementoring, surgical education, business development, healthcare innovation, and regulation were invited to attend a 2-day summit in Los Angeles, USA to outline the current state of surgical telementoring and chart the challenges and opportunities going forward. This article summarizes the discussion, conclusions, and recommendation of the technology group with regard to telementoring technology.

Results

This article reviews the technical requirements which can be divided into the following categories: (1) safety, (2) reliability, (3) transmission quality, (4) ease of use, and (5) cost.

Conclusion

Telementoring applications are technology driven. Given the pace of change of technology, guiding principles in technology design and selection are warranted (Table 4). Telementoring technologies require two basic components, video capturing and display devices at the transmitting and receiving end, and a telecommunication link between them. Many additional features can be added to this basic setup including multiple cameras or video sources, remote camera zoom and pan, recording and storage of videos and images, and telestration capabilities to mention just a few. In general, the cost of these technologies is feature driven. The education framework for each specific application should determine the need for these features (Schlachta in Surg Endosc https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-016-4988-5).
Literature
5.
go back to reference NIAAA (2015) Privacy and security in mobile health (mHealth) research. Alcohol Res: Curr Rev 36:1–10 NIAAA (2015) Privacy and security in mobile health (mHealth) research. Alcohol Res: Curr Rev 36:1–10
6.
go back to reference Adibi S, Wickramasinghe N, Chan C (2013) The cloud computing paradigm for mobile health. Int J Soft Comput Softw 3:403–410 Adibi S, Wickramasinghe N, Chan C (2013) The cloud computing paradigm for mobile health. Int J Soft Comput Softw 3:403–410
7.
go back to reference Robin M (2005) Horizontal resolution: pixel or lines, vol 1. Broadcast Engineering Robin M (2005) Horizontal resolution: pixel or lines, vol 1. Broadcast Engineering
Metadata
Title
White paper: technology for surgical telementoring—SAGES Project 6 Technology Working Group
Authors
Etai M. Bogen
Christopher M. Schlachta
Todd Ponsky
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06631-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2019 Go to the issue