Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2021

01-08-2021 | Minimally Invasive Surgery | Original Article

Hospital robotic use for colorectal cancer care

Authors: Aaron C. Spaulding, Hanadi Hamadi, Osayande Osagiede, Riccardo Lemini, Jordan J. Cochuyt, John Watson, James M. Naessens, Dorin T. Colibaseanu

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer continues to increase. However, not all organizations offer patients the option of robotic intervention. This study seeks to understand organizational characteristics associated with the utilization of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study of hospitals identified in the United States, State of Florida Inpatient Discharge Dataset, and linked data for those hospitals with the American Hospital Association Survey, Area Health Resource File and the Health Community Health Assessment Resource Tool Set. The study population included all robotic surgeries for colorectal cancer patients in 159 hospitals from 2013 to 2015. Logistic regressions identifying organizational, community, and combined community and organizational variables were utilized to determine associations. Results indicate that neither hospital competition nor disease burden in the community was associated with increased odds of robotic surgery use. However, per capita income (OR 1.07 95% CI 1.02, 1.12), average total margin (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001, 1.02) and large-sized hospitals compared to small hospitals (OR: 5.26, 95% CI 1.13, 24.44) were associated with increased odds of robotic use. This study found that market conditions within the U.S. State of Florida are not primary drivers of hospital use of robotic surgery. The ability for the population to pay for such services, and the hospital resources available to absorb the expense of purchasing the required equipment, appear to be more influential.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257CrossRef Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Narain AS et al (2018) Patient perceptions of minimally invasive versus open spine surgery. Clinical Spine Surg 31(3):E184–E192CrossRef Narain AS et al (2018) Patient perceptions of minimally invasive versus open spine surgery. Clinical Spine Surg 31(3):E184–E192CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abu Gazala M, Wexner SD (2017) Re-appraisal and consideration of minimally invasive surgery in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep 5(1):1–10CrossRef Abu Gazala M, Wexner SD (2017) Re-appraisal and consideration of minimally invasive surgery in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep 5(1):1–10CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hollis RH et al (2016) Understanding the value of both laparoscopic and robotic approaches compared to the open approach in colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26(11):850–856CrossRef Hollis RH et al (2016) Understanding the value of both laparoscopic and robotic approaches compared to the open approach in colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26(11):850–856CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moghadamyeghaneh Z et al (2016) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy. Surg Endosc 30(7):2792–2798CrossRef Moghadamyeghaneh Z et al (2016) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy. Surg Endosc 30(7):2792–2798CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Group, C.O.o.S.T.S (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Group, C.O.o.S.T.S (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Group, C.C.L.o.O.R.S (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRef Group, C.C.L.o.O.R.S (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRef
8.
go back to reference van der Pas MH et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218CrossRef van der Pas MH et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jeong S-Y et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774CrossRef Jeong S-Y et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Green B et al (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100(1):75–82CrossRef Green B et al (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100(1):75–82CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schootman M et al (2016) Adoption of robotic technology for treating colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59(11):1011–1018CrossRef Schootman M et al (2016) Adoption of robotic technology for treating colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59(11):1011–1018CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Al-Temimi MH et al (2019) Robotic versus laparoscopic elective colectomy for left side diverticulitis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the NSQIP database. Int J Colorectal Dis 34(8):1385–1392CrossRef Al-Temimi MH et al (2019) Robotic versus laparoscopic elective colectomy for left side diverticulitis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the NSQIP database. Int J Colorectal Dis 34(8):1385–1392CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Milone M et al (2019) Completeness of total mesorectum excision of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery: a review with a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 34(6):983–991CrossRef Milone M et al (2019) Completeness of total mesorectum excision of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery: a review with a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 34(6):983–991CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Phan K et al (2019) Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies. Tech Coloproctol 23(3):221–230CrossRef Phan K et al (2019) Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies. Tech Coloproctol 23(3):221–230CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Iacopino V, Mascia D, Cicchetti A (2018) Professional networks and the alignment of individual perceptions about medical innovation. Health Care Manage Rev 43(2):92–103CrossRef Iacopino V, Mascia D, Cicchetti A (2018) Professional networks and the alignment of individual perceptions about medical innovation. Health Care Manage Rev 43(2):92–103CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Osayande O et al (2019) Trends in the use of laparoscopy and robotics for colorectal cancer in Florida. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 29(7):926–933CrossRef Osayande O et al (2019) Trends in the use of laparoscopy and robotics for colorectal cancer in Florida. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 29(7):926–933CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Beane M (2019) Shadow learning: building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Adm Sci Q 64(1):87–123CrossRef Beane M (2019) Shadow learning: building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Adm Sci Q 64(1):87–123CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Carmichael JC et al (2017) Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American society of colon and rectal surgeons and society of American gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 60(8):761–784CrossRef Carmichael JC et al (2017) Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American society of colon and rectal surgeons and society of American gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 60(8):761–784CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Agwunobi A, Osborne P (2016) Dynamic capabilities and healthcare: a framework for enhancing the competitive advantage of hospitals. California Manag Rev 58(4):141–161CrossRef Agwunobi A, Osborne P (2016) Dynamic capabilities and healthcare: a framework for enhancing the competitive advantage of hospitals. California Manag Rev 58(4):141–161CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2020) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, vol 1. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2020) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, vol 1. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
31.
go back to reference Boedeker P (2017) Hierarchical linear modeling with maximum likelihood, restricted maximum likelihood, and fully Bayesian estimation. Prac Assess Res Eval 22(1):2 Boedeker P (2017) Hierarchical linear modeling with maximum likelihood, restricted maximum likelihood, and fully Bayesian estimation. Prac Assess Res Eval 22(1):2
32.
go back to reference Hamadi H et al (2019) medicare’hospital-acquired condition reduction program and community diversity in the united states: the need to account for racial and ethnic segregation. Hosp Top 97(4):148–155CrossRef Hamadi H et al (2019) medicare’hospital-acquired condition reduction program and community diversity in the united states: the need to account for racial and ethnic segregation. Hosp Top 97(4):148–155CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Spaulding A et al (2019) A community health case for psychiatric care: a cross-sectional study of county health rankings. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 57:1–6CrossRef Spaulding A et al (2019) A community health case for psychiatric care: a cross-sectional study of county health rankings. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 57:1–6CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cronin KA et al (2018) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part I: national cancer statistics. Cancer 124(13):2785–2800CrossRef Cronin KA et al (2018) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part I: national cancer statistics. Cancer 124(13):2785–2800CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Dor A et al (2012) Pricing of surgeries for colon cancer: patient severity and market factors. Cancer 118(23):5741–5748CrossRef Dor A et al (2012) Pricing of surgeries for colon cancer: patient severity and market factors. Cancer 118(23):5741–5748CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wright JD et al (2016) Effect of regional hospital competition and hospital financial status on the use of robotic-assisted surgery. JAMA Surg 151(7):612–620CrossRef Wright JD et al (2016) Effect of regional hospital competition and hospital financial status on the use of robotic-assisted surgery. JAMA Surg 151(7):612–620CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Melnick GA, Fonkych K (2016) Hospital prices increase in California, especially among hospitals in the largest multi-hospital systems. INQUIRY J Health Care Org Prov Finan 53:0046958016651555 Melnick GA, Fonkych K (2016) Hospital prices increase in California, especially among hospitals in the largest multi-hospital systems. INQUIRY J Health Care Org Prov Finan 53:0046958016651555
39.
go back to reference Van Eeghen EE et al (2015) Impact of age and comorbidity on survival in colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 6(6):605–612PubMedPubMedCentral Van Eeghen EE et al (2015) Impact of age and comorbidity on survival in colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 6(6):605–612PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Wilensky GR (2016) Robotic surgery: an example of when newer is not always better but clearly more expensive. Milbank Quart 94(1):43–46CrossRef Wilensky GR (2016) Robotic surgery: an example of when newer is not always better but clearly more expensive. Milbank Quart 94(1):43–46CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Addae JK et al (2017) A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery. J Surg Res 208:111–120CrossRef Addae JK et al (2017) A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery. J Surg Res 208:111–120CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Batool F et al (2018) A Regional and national database comparison of colorectal outcomes. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 22:4 Batool F et al (2018) A Regional and national database comparison of colorectal outcomes. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 22:4
43.
go back to reference Tam MS et al (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30(2):455–463CrossRef Tam MS et al (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30(2):455–463CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Shukla PJ, Scherr DS, Milsom JW (2010) Robot-assisted surgery and health care costs. N Engl J Med 363(22):2174CrossRef Shukla PJ, Scherr DS, Milsom JW (2010) Robot-assisted surgery and health care costs. N Engl J Med 363(22):2174CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Whyte JL et al (2015) An evaluation of algorithms for identifying metastatic breast, lung, or colorectal cancer in administrative claims data. Med Care 53(7):e49–e57CrossRef Whyte JL et al (2015) An evaluation of algorithms for identifying metastatic breast, lung, or colorectal cancer in administrative claims data. Med Care 53(7):e49–e57CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hospital robotic use for colorectal cancer care
Authors
Aaron C. Spaulding
Hanadi Hamadi
Osayande Osagiede
Riccardo Lemini
Jordan J. Cochuyt
John Watson
James M. Naessens
Dorin T. Colibaseanu
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01142-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2021 Go to the issue