Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Head and Neck Oncology

Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Quality of Life Scores of Oral Cavity and Oropharynx Cancer Patients

Authors: Yoav Binenbaum, MD, Moran Amit, MD, Salem Billan, MD, Jacob T. Cohen, MD, Ziv Gil, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest difference in quality of life (QOL) that patients perceive as beneficial and that mandates a change in management. We aimed to determine the MCID among patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer and to identify domains that are significantly affected during treatment.

Methods

The cohort consisted of 1,011 patients analyzed by a metaanalysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. MCID values for the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOLQ) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC C-30) and Head and Neck-35 questionnaires were calculated by using the distribution-based method.

Results

The mean MCID for Global QOL was 13.07 points for the UW-QOLQ and 9.43 in the EORTC C-30 questionnaire. High consistency in the MCID values was found between the two questionnaires examined. Heat map analysis indicated a clinically significant improvement in head and neck-associated domains and in domains associated with general cancer treatment 1 year or more after treatment relative to 3 months after treatment (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). In contrast, improvement in general and functional domains was not evident 1 year or more after treatment (p = 0.69).

Conclusions

This study suggests benchmark values for MCID and variation in QOL scores of oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients after treatment. Improvement in head and neck- and general cancer-associated domains may not be translated into a general and functional improvement during the first year of recovery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bessell A, Glenny AM, Furness S, et al. Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD006205.PubMed Bessell A, Glenny AM, Furness S, et al. Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD006205.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chandu A, Smith ACH, Rogers SN. Health-related quality of life in oral cancer: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:495–502.PubMedCrossRef Chandu A, Smith ACH, Rogers SN. Health-related quality of life in oral cancer: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:495–502.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Khafif A, Posen J, Yagil Y, et al. Quality of life in patients older than 75 years following major head and neck surgery. Head Neck. 2007;29:932–9.PubMedCrossRef Khafif A, Posen J, Yagil Y, et al. Quality of life in patients older than 75 years following major head and neck surgery. Head Neck. 2007;29:932–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lowe D, Rogers SN. University of Washington quality of life questionnaire. Seattle: University of Washington; 2012, pp. 1–14. Lowe D, Rogers SN. University of Washington quality of life questionnaire. Seattle: University of Washington; 2012, pp. 1–14.
6.
go back to reference Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1008–19.PubMed Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1008–19.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Torres-Carranza E, Infante-Cossío P, Hernández-Guisado JM, Hens-Aumente E, Gutierrez-Pérez JL. Assessment of quality of life in oral cancer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E735–41.PubMed Torres-Carranza E, Infante-Cossío P, Hernández-Guisado JM, Hens-Aumente E, Gutierrez-Pérez JL. Assessment of quality of life in oral cancer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E735–41.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ronis DL, Duffy SA, Fowler KE, Khan MJ, Terrell JE. Changes in quality of life over 1 year in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134:241–8.PubMedCrossRef Ronis DL, Duffy SA, Fowler KE, Khan MJ, Terrell JE. Changes in quality of life over 1 year in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134:241–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gritz ER, Carmack CL, de Moor C. et al. First year after head and neck cancer: quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:352–60.PubMed Gritz ER, Carmack CL, de Moor C. et al. First year after head and neck cancer: quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:352–60.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–15.PubMedCrossRef Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–15.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cella D, Hahn EA, Dineen K. Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:207–21.PubMedCrossRef Cella D, Hahn EA, Dineen K. Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:207–21.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:395–407.PubMedCrossRef Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:395–407.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Speer DC. Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60:402–8.PubMedCrossRef Speer DC. Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60:402–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ringash J, Bezjak A. A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 2001;23:201–13.PubMedCrossRef Ringash J, Bezjak A. A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 2001;23:201–13.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scott NW et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Sprangers on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. 2008. Scott NW et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Sprangers on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. 2008.
16.
go back to reference The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence: introductory document. 2011:1–3. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence: introductory document. 2011:1–3.
17.
go back to reference Miller GA. The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63:81–97.PubMedCrossRef Miller GA. The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63:81–97.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Norman GR. Point/counterpoint: interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life—the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92. Norman GR. Point/counterpoint: interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life—the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.
19.
go back to reference Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. 1994;47:81–7. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. 1994;47:81–7.
20.
go back to reference Sloan J, Symonds T, Vargas-Chanes D, Fridley B. Practical guidelines for assessing the clinical significance of health-related quality of life changes within clinical trials. Drug Inf J. 2003;37:23–31. Sloan J, Symonds T, Vargas-Chanes D, Fridley B. Practical guidelines for assessing the clinical significance of health-related quality of life changes within clinical trials. Drug Inf J. 2003;37:23–31.
21.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pmed1000097.
22.
go back to reference Chandu A, Sun KCV, DeSilva RN, Smith ACH. The assessment of quality of life in patients who have undergone surgery for oral cancer: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1606–12.PubMedCrossRef Chandu A, Sun KCV, DeSilva RN, Smith ACH. The assessment of quality of life in patients who have undergone surgery for oral cancer: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1606–12.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Oates J, Clark JR, Read J, Reeves N, Gao K, O’Brien CJ. Integration of prospective quality of life and nutritional assessment as routine components of multidisciplinary care of patients with head and neck cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:34–41.PubMedCrossRef Oates J, Clark JR, Read J, Reeves N, Gao K, O’Brien CJ. Integration of prospective quality of life and nutritional assessment as routine components of multidisciplinary care of patients with head and neck cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:34–41.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bekiroglu F, Ghazali N, Laycock R, Katre C, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Adjuvant radiotherapy and health-related quality of life of patients at intermediate risk of recurrence following primary surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:967–73.PubMedCrossRef Bekiroglu F, Ghazali N, Laycock R, Katre C, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Adjuvant radiotherapy and health-related quality of life of patients at intermediate risk of recurrence following primary surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:967–73.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rogers SN, Lowe D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. A comparison between the University of Washington Head and neck disease-specific measure and the medical short form 36, EORTC QOQ-C33 and EORTC head and neck 35. Oral Oncol. 1998;34:361–72.PubMedCrossRef Rogers SN, Lowe D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. A comparison between the University of Washington Head and neck disease-specific measure and the medical short form 36, EORTC QOQ-C33 and EORTC head and neck 35. Oral Oncol. 1998;34:361–72.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zwahlen RA, Dannemann C, Grätz KW, et al. Quality of life and psychiatric morbidity in patients successfully treated for oral cavity squamous cell cancer and their wives. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1125–32.PubMedCrossRef Zwahlen RA, Dannemann C, Grätz KW, et al. Quality of life and psychiatric morbidity in patients successfully treated for oral cavity squamous cell cancer and their wives. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1125–32.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kessler PA, Bloch-Birkholz A, Leher A, Neukam FW, Wiltfang J. Evaluation of quality of life of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of two treatment protocols in a prospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2004;70:275–82.PubMedCrossRef Kessler PA, Bloch-Birkholz A, Leher A, Neukam FW, Wiltfang J. Evaluation of quality of life of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of two treatment protocols in a prospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2004;70:275–82.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Airoldi M, Garzaro M, Raimondo L, et al. Functional and psychological evaluation after flap reconstruction plus radiotherapy in oral cancer. Head Neck. 2011;33:458–68.PubMedCrossRef Airoldi M, Garzaro M, Raimondo L, et al. Functional and psychological evaluation after flap reconstruction plus radiotherapy in oral cancer. Head Neck. 2011;33:458–68.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kazi R, Johnson C, Prasad V, et al. Quality of life outcome measures following partial glossectomy: assessment using the UW-QOL scale. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;4:116–20.CrossRef Kazi R, Johnson C, Prasad V, et al. Quality of life outcome measures following partial glossectomy: assessment using the UW-QOL scale. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;4:116–20.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hsing CY, Wong YK, Wang CP, et al. Comparison between free flap and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients: a quality of life analysis. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:522–7.PubMedCrossRef Hsing CY, Wong YK, Wang CP, et al. Comparison between free flap and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients: a quality of life analysis. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:522–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Girod DA, Sykes K, Jorgensen J, Tawfik O, Tsue T. Acellular dermis compared to skin grafts in oral cavity reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:2141–9.PubMedCrossRef Girod DA, Sykes K, Jorgensen J, Tawfik O, Tsue T. Acellular dermis compared to skin grafts in oral cavity reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:2141–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Feng FY, Kim HM, Lyden TH, et al. Intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy aiming to reduce dysphagia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer: clinical and functional results. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2732–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Feng FY, Kim HM, Lyden TH, et al. Intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy aiming to reduce dysphagia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer: clinical and functional results. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2732–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Li W, Yang Y, Xu Z, et al. Assessment of quality of life of patients with oral cavity cancer who have had defects reconstructed with free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:10–4. Li W, Yang Y, Xu Z, et al. Assessment of quality of life of patients with oral cavity cancer who have had defects reconstructed with free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:10–4.
34.
go back to reference Iwase M, Takemi T, Manabe M, Nagumo M. Hypercalcemic complication in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:174–80.PubMedCrossRef Iwase M, Takemi T, Manabe M, Nagumo M. Hypercalcemic complication in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:174–80.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Klug C, Neuburg J, Glaser C, Schwarz B, Kermer C, Millesi W. Quality of life 2–10 years after combined treatment for advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:664–9.PubMedCrossRef Klug C, Neuburg J, Glaser C, Schwarz B, Kermer C, Millesi W. Quality of life 2–10 years after combined treatment for advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:664–9.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rogers SN, Miller RD, Ali K, Minhas AB, Williams HF, Lowe D. Patients’ perceived health status following primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:913–9.PubMedCrossRef Rogers SN, Miller RD, Ali K, Minhas AB, Williams HF, Lowe D. Patients’ perceived health status following primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:913–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Borggreven PA, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Muller MJ, et al. Quality of life and functional status in patients with cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx: pretreatment values of a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:651–7. Borggreven PA, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Muller MJ, et al. Quality of life and functional status in patients with cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx: pretreatment values of a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:651–7.
38.
go back to reference Devine JC, Rogers SN, McNally D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. A comparison of aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes following lip-split mandibulotomy and mandibular lingual releasing access procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:199–204.PubMedCrossRef Devine JC, Rogers SN, McNally D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. A comparison of aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes following lip-split mandibulotomy and mandibular lingual releasing access procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:199–204.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Schünemann HJ, Akl EA, Guyatt GH. Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: the clinician’s perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schünemann HJ, Akl EA, Guyatt GH. Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: the clinician’s perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kanatas AN, Mehanna HM, Lowe D, Rogers SN. A second national survey of health-related quality of life questionnaires in head and neck oncology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91:420–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kanatas AN, Mehanna HM, Lowe D, Rogers SN. A second national survey of health-related quality of life questionnaires in head and neck oncology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91:420–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bonnetain F, Dahan L, Maillard E, et al. Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration as a means of longitudinal analysis for treatment trials in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2753–62.PubMedCrossRef Bonnetain F, Dahan L, Maillard E, et al. Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration as a means of longitudinal analysis for treatment trials in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2753–62.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Maringwa J, Quinten C, King M, et al. Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2107–12.PubMedCrossRef Maringwa J, Quinten C, King M, et al. Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2107–12.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Amit M, Abergel A, Fliss DM, Gil Z. The clinical importance of quality-of-life scores in patients with skull base tumors: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012;14:175–81.PubMedCrossRef Amit M, Abergel A, Fliss DM, Gil Z. The clinical importance of quality-of-life scores in patients with skull base tumors: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012;14:175–81.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference So WK, Chan RJ, Chan DN, et al. Quality-of-life among head and neck cancer survivors at one year after treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2391–408.PubMedCrossRef So WK, Chan RJ, Chan DN, et al. Quality-of-life among head and neck cancer survivors at one year after treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2391–408.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Ware JE, Snow K, K. M. SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. 1993. Ware JE, Snow K, K. M. SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. 1993.
Metadata
Title
Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Quality of Life Scores of Oral Cavity and Oropharynx Cancer Patients
Authors
Yoav Binenbaum, MD
Moran Amit, MD
Salem Billan, MD
Jacob T. Cohen, MD
Ziv Gil, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3656-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2014 Go to the issue