Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health Economics Review
Published in: Health Economics Review 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research

Mind the information gap: fertility rate and use of cesarean delivery and tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan

Authors: Ke-Zong M Ma, Edward C Norton, Shoou-Yih D Lee

Published in: Health Economics Review | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physician-induced demand (PID) is an important theory to test given the longstanding controversy surrounding it. Empirical health economists have been challenged to find natural experiments to test the theory because PID is tantamount to strong income effects. The data requirements are both a strong exogenous change in income and two types of treatment that are substitutes but have different net revenues. The theory implies that an exogenous fall in income would lead physicians to recoup their income by substituting a more expensive treatment for a less expensive treatment. This study takes advantages of the dramatic decline in the Taiwanese fertility rate to examine whether an exogenous and negative income shock to obstetricians and gynecologists (ob/gyns) affected the use of c-sections, which has a higher reimbursement rate than vaginal delivery under Taiwan's National Health Insurance system during the study period, and tocolytic hospitalizations.

Methods

The primary data were obtained from the 1996 to 2004 National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We hypothesized that a negative income shock to ob/gyns would cause them to provide more c-sections and tocolytic hospitalizations to less medically-informed pregnant women. Multinomial probit and probit models were estimated and the marginal effects of the interaction term were conducted to estimate the impacts of ob/gyn to birth ratio and the information gap.

Results

Our results showed that a decline in fertility did not lead ob/gyns to supply more c-sections to less medically-informed pregnant women, and that during fertility decline ob/gyns may supply more tocolytic hospitalizations to compensate their income loss, regardless of pregnant women's access to health information.

Conclusion

The exogenous decline in the Taiwanese fertility rate and the use of detailed medical information and demographic attributes of pregnant women allowed us to avoid the endogeneity problem that threatened the validity of prior research. They also provide more accurate estimates of PID.
JEL Classification: I10, I19, C23, C25
Literature
1.
Arrow KJ: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 1963, 53: 941–973.
2.
McGuire TG: Physician agency. In Handbook of health economics. Edited by: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP. North Holland: Elsevier; 2000:461–536.
3.
McGuire TG, Pauly MV: Physician response to fee changes with multiple payers. J of Health Econ 1991, 10: 385–410. 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90022-FCrossRef
4.
Gruber J, Owings M: Physician financial incentives and cesarean section delivery. RAND J Econ 1996, 27: 99–123. 10.2307/2555794PubMedCrossRef
5.
Lo JC: Financial incentives do not always work-an example of cesarean sections in Taiwan. Health Policy 2008, 88: 121–129. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.02.013PubMedCrossRef
6.
Kenkel D: Consumer health information and the demand for medical care. Rev Econ Stat 1990, 72: 587–595. 10.2307/2109598CrossRef
7.
Bunker JP, Brown BW: The physician-patient as an informed consumer of surgical services. N Engl J Med 1974, 290: 1051–1055. 10.1056/NEJM197405092901905PubMedCrossRef
8.
Pauly MV, Satterthwaite MA: The pricing of primary care physicians services: a test of the role of consumer information. Bell J Econ 1981, 12: 488–506. 10.2307/3003568CrossRef
9.
Hay J, Leahy MJ: Physician-induced demand: an empirical analysis of the consumer information gap. J Health Econ 1982, 1: 231–244. 10.1016/0167-6296(82)90002-9PubMedCrossRef
10.
Chou YJ, Huang N, Deng CY, Tsai YW, Chen LS, Lee CH: Do physicians and their relatives have a decreased rate of cesarean section? Birth 2006, 33: 195–202. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00104.xPubMedCrossRef
11.
Donati S, Grandolfo ME, Andreozzi S: Do Italian mothers prefer cesarean delivery? Birth 2003, 30: 89–93. 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00226.xPubMedCrossRef
12.
Lee SI, Khang YH, Lee MS: Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea-a society with high cesarean rates. Birth 2004, 31: 108–116. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00288.xPubMedCrossRef
13.
Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C: Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community. Birth 2004, 31: 117–124. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00289.xPubMedCrossRef
14.
Lee SI, Khang YH, Yun S, Jo MW: Rising rates, changing relationships: cesarean section and its correlates in South Korea, 1988–2000. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 112: 810–819. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00535.xCrossRef
15.
Linton A, Peterson MR, Williams TV: Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996–2002. Birth 2004, 31: 3–9. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0268.xPubMedCrossRef
16.
Hass JS, Berman S, Goldberg AB, Lee LWK, Cook EF: Prenatal hospitalization and compliance with guidelines for prenatal care. Am J Public Health 1996, 86: 815–819. 10.2105/AJPH.86.6.815CrossRef
17.
Nicholson WK, Frick KD, Powe NR: Economic burden of hospitalizations for preterm labor in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2000, 96: 95–101. 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00863-2PubMedCrossRef
18.
Bacak SJ, Callaghan WM, Dietz PM, Crouse C: Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 192: 592–597. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.638PubMedCrossRef
19.
Ambrose S, Rhea DJ, Istwan NB, Collins A, Stanziano G: Clinical and economic outcomes of preterm labor management: inpatient vs. outpatient. J Perinatol 2004, 24: 515–9. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211139PubMedCrossRef
20.
Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V: Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 100: 883–6. 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02270-6CrossRef
21.
Coleman B, Grant T, Mueller B: Hospitalization and infant outcomes among women exposed and unexposed to tocolysis. J Perinatol 2005, 25: 258–64. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211246PubMedCrossRef
22.
Xirasagar S, Lin HC: Maternal request CS-role of hospital teaching status and for-profit ownership. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007, 132: 27–34. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022PubMedCrossRef
23.
Liu TC, Chen CS, Lin HC: Does elective cesarean section increase utilization of postpartum maternal medical care? Med Care 2008, 46: 440–43. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31816493e9PubMedCrossRef
24.
Dranove D, Wehner P: Physician-induced demand for childbirth. J Health Econ 1994, 13: 61–73. 10.1016/0167-6296(94)90004-3PubMedCrossRef
25.
Gaynor M: Issues in the industrial organization of the market for physician services. J Econ Manage Strategy 1994, 3: 211–55. 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1994.00211.xCrossRef
26.
Chen LS, Huang N, Tsay JH, Wang PJ, Chou YJ, Chou P, Lee CH: Screening for cervical cancer among female physicians and their relatives in Taiwan-a population-based comparative study. Prev Med 2007, 44: 531–535. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.02.001PubMedCrossRef
27.
Chou YA, Chou YJ, Lee CH, Huang N: Pregnancy outcomes among native and foreign-born women in Taiwan: maternal health utilization. J Women's Health 2008, 17: 1505–1512. 10.1089/jwh.2007.0714CrossRef
28.
Dubay L, Kaestner R, Waidmann T: The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean sections Rates. J Health Econ 1999, 18: 491–522. 10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00004-1PubMedCrossRef
29.
McKenzie L, Stephenson PA: Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State. Am J Public Health 1993, 83: 1109–1112. 10.2105/AJPH.83.8.1109PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
Ma KZM, Norton EC, Tsai EM, Lee SYD: Factors associated with tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan: evidence from a population-based and longitudinal study from 1997 to 2004. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009, 59: 9.
31.
Lin HC, Sheen TC, Tang CH, Kao S: Association between maternal age and the likelihood of a cesarean section: a population-based multivariate logistic regression analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83: 1178–1183.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Bolduc D, Lacroix G, Muller C: The choice of medical providers in rural Benin: a comparison of discrete choice models. J Health Econ 1996, 15: 477–498. 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00492-4PubMedCrossRef
33.
Ai C, Norton EC: 2003: Interaction terms in Logit and Probit models. Econ Letters 2003, 80: 123–129. 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6CrossRef
34.
Norton EC, Wang H, Ai C: Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata J 2004, 4: 154–167.
35.
Robertson PA, Sniderman SH, Laros RK Jr, Cowan R, Heilbran D, Goldenberg RL: Neonatal morbidity according to gestational age and birth weight from tertiary care centers in the United States, 1983 through 1986. Am J of Obstet Gynecol 1992, 166: 1629–1641.CrossRef
36.
Lien HM, Chou SY, Liu JT: Hospital ownership and performance: Evidence from stroke and cardiac treatment in Taiwan. J Health Econ 2008, 27: 1208–1223. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.03.002PubMedCrossRef
37.
Sloan FA: Not-for-profit ownership and hospital behavior. In Handbook of health economics. Edited by: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP. North Holland: Elsevier; 2000:1141–1174.
38.
Visewanathan M, Visco AG, Hartman K, Wechter ME, Gartlehner G, Wu JM, Palmieri R, Funk MJ, Lux L, Swinson T, Lohr KN: Cesarean delivery on maternal request. AHRQ Publication No. 06-E009 2006.
39.
Yip WC: Physicians response to Medicare fee reductions: changes in the volume of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries in the Medicare and private sectors. J Health Econ 1998, 17: 675–699. 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00024-1PubMedCrossRef
40.
Weaver JJ, Statham H, Richards M: Are there "unnecessary" cesarean sections? perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for non-clinical indicators. Birth 2007, 34: 32–41. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00144.xPubMedCrossRef
41.
Lo JC: Patients' attitudes vs. physician's determination: implications for cesarean sections. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57: 91–96. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00301-5PubMedCrossRef
42.
Hsu CY, Lo JC, Chang JH, Chen CP, Yu S, Huang YF: Cesarean births in Taiwan. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2007, 96: 57–61. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.09.011CrossRef
43.
Ma KZM, Norton EC, Lee SYD: Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan. Health Serv Res 2010, 45: 1360–1375. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01125.xPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
44.
Parrish KM, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Connell FA, LoGerfo JP: Effects of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates. JAMA 1994, 271: 443–447. 10.1001/jama.1994.03510300049037PubMedCrossRef
45.
Burns LR, Geller SE, Wholey DR: The effects of physician factors on the cesarean section decision. Med Care 1995, 33: 365–382. 10.1097/00005650-199504000-00004PubMedCrossRef
46.
Brown HS III: Physician demand for leisure: implications for cesarean section rates. J Health Econ 1996, 15: 223–242.CrossRef
47.
Dickert-Conlin S, Chandra A: Taxes and timing of birth. J Polit Econ 1999, 107: 161–177. 10.1086/250054CrossRef
48.
Liu JL: The impact of air pollution regulations on infant health: evidence from the 1992 clean air act amendments in Taiwan [in Chinese]. Taiwan Econ Rev 2007, 35: 477–511.
49.
Williams RL, Chen PM: Controlling the rise in cesarean section rates by the dissemination of information from vital records. Am J of Public Health 1983, 73: 863–867. 10.2105/AJPH.73.8.863CrossRef
50.
Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K: Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med 1989, 321: 1306–11. 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906PubMedCrossRef
51.
Porreco RP: Meeting the challenges of the rising in cesarean birth rate. Obstet Gynecol 1990, 75: 133–6.PubMed
52.
Stafford RS: Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts. Am J of Public Health 1990,80(3):313–5. 10.2105/AJPH.80.3.313CrossRef
53.
Nerum H, Halvorsen L, Sørlie T, et al.: Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling? Birth 2006, 33: 221–8. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00107.xPubMedCrossRef
54.
Finkler MD, Wirtschafter DD: Why pay extra for cesarean deliveries? Inquiry 1993, 30: 208–15.PubMed
55.
Epstein AM, Newhouse JP: The impact in Medicaid expansion for pregnant women on early prenatal care, use of cesarean section and maternal and infant health outcomes in South Carolina and California. Health Care Financ Rev 1998, 19: 85–99.PubMedCentralPubMed
56.
Gruber J, Kim J, Mayzlin D: Physician fees and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery. J Health Econ 1999, 18: 473–90. 10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00009-0PubMedCrossRef
57.
Spetz J, Smith MW, Ennis SF: Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California. Med Care 2001, 39: 536–50. 10.1097/00005650-200106000-00003PubMedCrossRef
58.
Stafford RS: Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates. JAMA 1990, 263: 683–87. 10.1001/jama.1990.03440050077037PubMedCrossRef
59.
Keeler EB, Brodie M: Economics incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Milbank Q 1993, 71: 365–404. 10.2307/3350407PubMedCrossRef
60.
Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn D, et al.: Results and Policy implications for the resource-based relative value study. N Engl J Med 1988, 319: 881–889. 10.1056/NEJM198809293191330PubMedCrossRef
61.
Spellacy WN: Vaginal birth after cesarean: a reward/penalty system for national implication. Obstet Gynecol 1991, 78: 316–7.PubMed
62.
Keeler EB, Fok T: Equalizing physician fees had little effect on cesarean rates. Med Care Res Rev 1996, 53: 465–71. 10.1177/107755879605300405PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mind the information gap: fertility rate and use of cesarean delivery and tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan
Authors
Ke-Zong M Ma
Edward C Norton
Shoou-Yih D Lee
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health Economics Review / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 2191-1991
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-20

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Health Economics Review 1/2011 Go to the issue

Research

The effect of job stress on smoking and alcohol consumption

Research

Healthy vs. unhealthy food: a strategic choice for firms and consumers

Review

Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature

Research

Flat-of-the-curve medicine: a new perspective on the production of health

Research

Private hospital accreditation and inducement of care under the ghanaian national insurance scheme

Editorial

Greetings from the Editors