Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study

Authors: Justine Jeffery, Alistair Hewison, Laura Goodwin, Sara Kenyon

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For the past decade, Maternal Mortality Reports, published in the United Kingdom every three years, have consistently raised concerns about maternal observations in maternity care. The reports identify that observations are not being done, not being completed fully, are not recorded on Early Warning Score systems, and/or are not escalated appropriately. This has resulted in delays in referral, intervention and increases the risk of maternal morbidity or mortality. However there has been little exploration of the possible reasons for non-completion of maternal observations.

Methods

The aim of this study was to explore midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns in rural and urban maternity settings in the West Midlands of England. A qualitative design involving a series of six focus groups with midwives and Supervisors of Midwives was employed to investigate the facilitators of, and barriers to the completion of maternal observations.

Results

Eighteen Midwives and 8 Supervisors of Midwives participated in a total of 6 focus groups. Three key themes emerged from the data: (1) Organisation of Maternal Observations (including delegation of tasks to Midwifery Support Workers, variation in their training, the care model used e.g. one to one care, and staffing issues); (2) Prioritisation of Maternal Observations (including the role of professional judgement and concerns expressed by midwives that they did not feel equipped to care for women with complex clinical needs; and (3) Negotiated Escalation (including the inappropriate response from senior staff to use of Modified Early Warning Score systems, and the emotional impact of escalation).

Conclusions

A number of organisational and cultural barriers exist to the completion of maternal observations and the escalation of concerns. In order to address these the following actions are recommended: standardised training for Midwifery Support Workers, review of training of midwives to ensure it addresses the increasing complexity of the maternal population, identification and agreement regarding the organisation of maternal observations among staff, an emphasis on increasing the priority placed on maternal observations in all clinical settings, and clarification and reinforcement of escalation procedures for both midwives and senior clinicians.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Neilson J, Shakespeare J, Kurinczuk J. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care - lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confiential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: MBRRACE UK; 2014. Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Neilson J, Shakespeare J, Kurinczuk J. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care - lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confiential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: MBRRACE UK; 2014.
5.
go back to reference Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, et al. Saving Mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011; 118:Suppl. 1:1–203. Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, et al. Saving Mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011; 118:Suppl. 1:1–203.
6.
go back to reference Lewis G. The confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers' lives: reviewig maternal deaths to make motherhood safer - 2003-2005. In: The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007. Lewis G. The confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers' lives: reviewig maternal deaths to make motherhood safer - 2003-2005. In: The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007.
7.
go back to reference Bick DE, Sandall J, Furuta M, Wee MY, Isaacs R, Smith GB, et al. A national cross sectional survey of heads of midwifery services of uptake, benefits and barriers to use of obstetric early warning systems (EWS) by midwives. Midwifery. 2014;30(11):1140–6.CrossRefPubMed Bick DE, Sandall J, Furuta M, Wee MY, Isaacs R, Smith GB, et al. A national cross sectional survey of heads of midwifery services of uptake, benefits and barriers to use of obstetric early warning systems (EWS) by midwives. Midwifery. 2014;30(11):1140–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Knight M, Tuffnell D, Kenyon S, Shakespeare J, Gray R, Kurinczuk J. Saving lives, improving Mothers' Care - surveillance of maternal deaths in the UK 2011–13 and lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–13. Oxford: MBRRACE UK; 2015. Knight M, Tuffnell D, Kenyon S, Shakespeare J, Gray R, Kurinczuk J. Saving lives, improving Mothers' Care - surveillance of maternal deaths in the UK 2011–13 and lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–13. Oxford: MBRRACE UK; 2015.
11.
go back to reference Births S. Everybody's business. An independent inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England. London: King's Fund; 2008. Births S. Everybody's business. An independent inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England. London: King's Fund; 2008.
12.
go back to reference National Maternity Review. Better births. Improving outcomes of maternity services in England. In: A five year forward view for maternity care. England: NHS; 2016. National Maternity Review. Better births. Improving outcomes of maternity services in England. In: A five year forward view for maternity care. England: NHS; 2016.
13.
14.
go back to reference Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Zinevich Y, Nicolaides KH. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):634–43.CrossRefPubMed Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Zinevich Y, Nicolaides KH. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):634–43.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Heagerty BV. Reassessing the guilty: the midwives act and the control of English midwives in the early 20th century. Supervision of. Midwives. 1996:13–27. Heagerty BV. Reassessing the guilty: the midwives act and the control of English midwives in the early 20th century. Supervision of. Midwives. 1996:13–27.
17.
go back to reference Midwifery supervision and regulation: Recommendations for change. London: Parliamentatry and Health Service Ombudsman; 2013. Midwifery supervision and regulation: Recommendations for change. London: Parliamentatry and Health Service Ombudsman; 2013.
21.
go back to reference Isaacs R, Wee M, Bick D, Beake S, Sheppard Z, Thomas S, et al. A national survey of obstetric early warning systems in the United Kingdom: five years on. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(7):687–92.CrossRefPubMed Isaacs R, Wee M, Bick D, Beake S, Sheppard Z, Thomas S, et al. A national survey of obstetric early warning systems in the United Kingdom: five years on. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(7):687–92.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mackintosh N, Watson K, Rance S, Sandall J. Value of a modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in managing maternal complications in the peripartum period: an ethnographic study. BMJ quality & safety. 2014;23(1):26–34.CrossRef Mackintosh N, Watson K, Rance S, Sandall J. Value of a modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in managing maternal complications in the peripartum period: an ethnographic study. BMJ quality & safety. 2014;23(1):26–34.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hogan J. Why don't nurses monitor the respiratory rates of patients? Br J Nurs. 2006;15(9):489–92.CrossRefPubMed Hogan J. Why don't nurses monitor the respiratory rates of patients? Br J Nurs. 2006;15(9):489–92.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hands C, Reid E, Meredith P, Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt PE, et al. Patterns in the recording of vital signs and early warning scores: compliance with a clinical escalation protocol. BMJ quality & safety. 2013;22(9):719–26.CrossRef Hands C, Reid E, Meredith P, Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt PE, et al. Patterns in the recording of vital signs and early warning scores: compliance with a clinical escalation protocol. BMJ quality & safety. 2013;22(9):719–26.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wheatley I. The nursing practice of taking level 1 patient observations. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2006;22(2):115–21.CrossRefPubMed Wheatley I. The nursing practice of taking level 1 patient observations. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2006;22(2):115–21.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chua W, Mackey S, Ng E, Liaw S. Front line nurses' experiences with deteriorating ward patients: a qualitative study. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;60(4):501–9.CrossRefPubMed Chua W, Mackey S, Ng E, Liaw S. Front line nurses' experiences with deteriorating ward patients: a qualitative study. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;60(4):501–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Odell M. Detection and management of the deteriorating ward patient: an evaluation of nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(1–2):173–82.CrossRefPubMed Odell M. Detection and management of the deteriorating ward patient: an evaluation of nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(1–2):173–82.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Steen M, Walsh D. Making normal birth a reality. Annual Revista APEO. 2007;8:15–9. Steen M, Walsh D. Making normal birth a reality. Annual Revista APEO. 2007;8:15–9.
30.
go back to reference Elliott D, Allen E, Perry L, Fry M, Duffield C, Gallagher R, et al. Clinical user experiences of observation and response charts: focus group findings of using a new format chart incorporating a track and trigger system. BMJ quality & safety. 2015;24(1):65–75.CrossRef Elliott D, Allen E, Perry L, Fry M, Duffield C, Gallagher R, et al. Clinical user experiences of observation and response charts: focus group findings of using a new format chart incorporating a track and trigger system. BMJ quality & safety. 2015;24(1):65–75.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Shearer B, Marshall S, Buist MD, Finnigan M, Kitto S, Hore T, et al. What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service. BMJ quality & safety. 2012;21(7):569–75.CrossRef Shearer B, Marshall S, Buist MD, Finnigan M, Kitto S, Hore T, et al. What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service. BMJ quality & safety. 2012;21(7):569–75.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Cioffi J. Nurses’ experiences of making decisions to call emergency assistance to their patients. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(1):108–14.CrossRefPubMed Cioffi J. Nurses’ experiences of making decisions to call emergency assistance to their patients. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(1):108–14.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Massey D, Chaboyer W, Aitken L. Nurses’ perceptions of accessing a medical emergency team: a qualitative study. Australian Critical Care. 2014;27(3):133–8.CrossRefPubMed Massey D, Chaboyer W, Aitken L. Nurses’ perceptions of accessing a medical emergency team: a qualitative study. Australian Critical Care. 2014;27(3):133–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: Sage; 2013. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: Sage; 2013.
35.
go back to reference Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1994;16(1):103–21.CrossRef Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1994;16(1):103–21.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Finch H, Lewis J, Turley C, Focus groups. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice. 2nd ed. London: SAGE publications; 2014. p. 202–11. Finch H, Lewis J, Turley C, Focus groups. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice. 2nd ed. London: SAGE publications; 2014. p. 202–11.
37.
go back to reference Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree B, Miller W, editors. Doing Qualitative Research: Research Methods for Primary Care, vol. Volume 3. London: SAGE Publications Inc; 1992. p. 33–47. Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree B, Miller W, editors. Doing Qualitative Research: Research Methods for Primary Care, vol. Volume 3. London: SAGE Publications Inc; 1992. p. 33–47.
38.
go back to reference Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. Journal of mixed methods research. 2007;1(1):77–100. Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. Journal of mixed methods research. 2007;1(1):77–100.
39.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2013. Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2013.
40.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publications; 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publications; 1990.
41.
go back to reference Wellings K, Branigan P, Mitchell K. Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2000;2(3):255–67.CrossRef Wellings K, Branigan P, Mitchell K. Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2000;2(3):255–67.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.CrossRef Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.CrossRef
43.
44.
go back to reference Andrews T, Waterman H. Packaging: a grounded theory of how to report physiological deterioration effectively. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):473–81.CrossRefPubMed Andrews T, Waterman H. Packaging: a grounded theory of how to report physiological deterioration effectively. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):473–81.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Fisher RJ. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res. 1993;20(2):303–15.CrossRef Fisher RJ. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res. 1993;20(2):303–15.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study
Authors
Justine Jeffery
Alistair Hewison
Laura Goodwin
Sara Kenyon
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1472-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue