Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Midwives’ experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth

Authors: Lucy Lewis, Yvonne L. Hauck, Janice Butt, Chloe Western, Helen Overing, Corrinne Poletti, Jessica Priest, Dawn Hudd, Brooke Thomson

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is limited research examining midwives' education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth. Our aim was to address this gap in evidence and build knowledge around this important topic.

Methods

This mixed method study was performed in two phases, between August and December 2016, in the birth centre of a tertiary public maternity hospital in Western Australia. Phase one utilised a cross sectional design to examine perceptions of education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth through a questionnaire. Phase two employed a qualitative descriptive design and focus groups to explore what midwives enjoyed about caring for women who labour or birth in water and the challenges midwives experienced with waterbirth. Frequency distributions were employed for quantitative data. Thematic analysis was undertaken to extract common themes from focus group transcripts.

Results

The majority (85%; 29 of 34) of midwives surveyed returned a questionnaire. Results from phase one confirmed that following training, 93% (27 of 29) of midwives felt equipped to facilitate waterbirth and the mean waterbirths required to facilitate confidence was seven. Midwives were confident caring for women in water during the first, second and third stage of labour and enjoyed facilitating water immersion for labour and birth. Finally, responses to labour and birth scenarios indicated midwives were practicing according to state-wide clinical guidance.
Phase two included two focus groups of seven and five midwives. Exploration of what midwives enjoyed about caring for women who used water immersion revealed three themes: instinctive birthing; woman-centred atmosphere; and undisturbed space. Exploration of the challenges experienced with waterbirth revealed two themes: learning through reflection and facilities required to support waterbirth.

Conclusions

This research contributes to the growing knowledge base examining midwives' education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth. It also highlights the importance of exploring what immersion in water for labour and birth offers midwives, as this research suggests they are integral to sustaining waterbirth as an option for low risk women.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lewis L, Hauck Y, Butt J, Hornbuckle J. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women intending to use immersion in water for labour and birth in Western Australia (2015-2016): a retrospective audit of clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12758. Lewis L, Hauck Y, Butt J, Hornbuckle J. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women intending to use immersion in water for labour and birth in Western Australia (2015-2016): a retrospective audit of clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018:1–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ajo.​12758.
3.
go back to reference Ulrich B, Krozek C, Early S, Ashlock CH, Africa LM, Carman ML. Improving retention, confidence, and competence of new graduate nurses: results from a 10-year longitudinal database. Nurs Econ. 2010;28:363–76.PubMed Ulrich B, Krozek C, Early S, Ashlock CH, Africa LM, Carman ML. Improving retention, confidence, and competence of new graduate nurses: results from a 10-year longitudinal database. Nurs Econ. 2010;28:363–76.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Nicholls S, Hauck YL, Bayes S, Butt J. Exploring midwives’ perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: a qualitative descriptive study. Midwifery. 2016;33:73–81.CrossRefPubMed Nicholls S, Hauck YL, Bayes S, Butt J. Exploring midwives’ perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: a qualitative descriptive study. Midwifery. 2016;33:73–81.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Russell K. Struggling to get into the pool room. A critical discourse analysis of midwives water birth practices. Int J Childbirth. 2011;1:52–60.CrossRef Russell K. Struggling to get into the pool room. A critical discourse analysis of midwives water birth practices. Int J Childbirth. 2011;1:52–60.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cooper M, McCutcheon H, Warland J. A critical analysis of Australian policies and guidelines for water immersion during labour and birth. Women Birth. 2017;30(5):431–41.CrossRefPubMed Cooper M, McCutcheon H, Warland J. A critical analysis of Australian policies and guidelines for water immersion during labour and birth. Women Birth. 2017;30(5):431–41.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cluett ER, Burns E. Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD000111. Cluett ER, Burns E. Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD000111.
9.
go back to reference Nutter E, Meyer S, Shaw-Battista J, et al. Waterbirth: an integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(3):286–319.CrossRefPubMed Nutter E, Meyer S, Shaw-Battista J, et al. Waterbirth: an integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(3):286–319.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Young K, Kruske S. How valid are the common concerns raised against water birth? A focused review of the literature. Women Birth. 2013;26(2):105–9.CrossRefPubMed Young K, Kruske S. How valid are the common concerns raised against water birth? A focused review of the literature. Women Birth. 2013;26(2):105–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Toohill J, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, Fenwick J, Creedy DK. Factors influencing midwives’ use of an evidenced based normal birth guideline. Women Birth. 2017;30(5):415–23.CrossRefPubMed Toohill J, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, Fenwick J, Creedy DK. Factors influencing midwives’ use of an evidenced based normal birth guideline. Women Birth. 2017;30(5):415–23.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Creswell J, Plano Clark V. The foundations of mixed methods research. In: Creswell J, Plano Clark V, editors. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage; 2011. p. 19–52. Creswell J, Plano Clark V. The foundations of mixed methods research. In: Creswell J, Plano Clark V, editors. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage; 2011. p. 19–52.
14.
go back to reference Polit D, Beck C. Designing and conducting mixed methods studies to generate evidence for nursing. In: Polit D, Beck C, editors. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Sydney: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. 149–62. Polit D, Beck C. Designing and conducting mixed methods studies to generate evidence for nursing. In: Polit D, Beck C, editors. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Sydney: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. 149–62.
15.
go back to reference Johnson B, Onwuegbuzie A, Turner L. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1:112–33.CrossRef Johnson B, Onwuegbuzie A, Turner L. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1:112–33.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Homer CS. Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care. Med J Aust. 2016;205(8):370–4.CrossRefPubMed Homer CS. Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care. Med J Aust. 2016;205(8):370–4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;28:4. CD004667 Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;28:4. CD004667
20.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Akileswaran CP, Hutchison MS. Making room at the table for obstetrics, midwifery, and a culture of normalcy within maternity care. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):176–80.CrossRefPubMed Akileswaran CP, Hutchison MS. Making room at the table for obstetrics, midwifery, and a culture of normalcy within maternity care. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):176–80.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–92.CrossRefPubMed Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–92.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Takase M, Yamamoto M, Sato Y, Niitani M, Uemura C. The relationship between workplace learning and midwives’ and nurses’ self-reported competence: a cross –sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(12):1804–15.CrossRefPubMed Takase M, Yamamoto M, Sato Y, Niitani M, Uemura C. The relationship between workplace learning and midwives’ and nurses’ self-reported competence: a cross –sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(12):1804–15.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–45.CrossRefPubMed Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–45.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Campbell J, et al. Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384(994):1226–35.CrossRefPubMed Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Campbell J, et al. Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384(994):1226–35.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Newton MS, McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Willis KF. Understanding the ‘work’ of caseload midwives: a mixed-methods exploration of two caseload midwifery models in Victoria, Australia. Women Birth. 2016;29(3):223–33.CrossRefPubMed Newton MS, McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Willis KF. Understanding the ‘work’ of caseload midwives: a mixed-methods exploration of two caseload midwifery models in Victoria, Australia. Women Birth. 2016;29(3):223–33.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Woolly CM. Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. J Mix Methods Res. 2009;3(1):7–25.CrossRef Woolly CM. Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. J Mix Methods Res. 2009;3(1):7–25.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Midwives’ experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth
Authors
Lucy Lewis
Yvonne L. Hauck
Janice Butt
Chloe Western
Helen Overing
Corrinne Poletti
Jessica Priest
Dawn Hudd
Brooke Thomson
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1823-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue