Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Artificial Organs 1/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Article

Mid- to long-term results of resurfacing hip arthroplasty in Japanese patients: a comparison of osteoarthritic vs non-osteoarthritic patients

Authors: Daisuke Inoue, Tamon Kabata, Yoshitomo Kajino, Tomoharu Takagi, Takaaki Ohmori, Junya Yoshitani, Takuro Ueno, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya

Published in: Journal of Artificial Organs | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Past reports showed good mid-term results of RHA for Japanese patients. However, few reports have compared the mid- to long-term results for RHA in Japanese patients with and without osteoarthritis. Therefore, this study investigated the mid- to long-term results of RHA in Japanese patients with osteoarthritis compared to those without. We conducted a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 92 hips in 80 patients (59 men and 21 women). The minimum follow-up period was 5 years. The JOA hip scoring system was used to clinically evaluate hip function. In the radiological assessment, stem–shaft angle, inclination of the acetabular component, postoperative complications, and adverse reactions around RHA were evaluated. The 10-year survival rate using the Kaplan–Meier method was investigated to compare patients with and without osteoarthritis. A significant difference was observed between the preoperative and postoperative JOA hip scores of either group. Also, the radiological assessment revealed no significant changes in either group. All three revision THAs were performed on patients in the only non-osteoarthritis group. In the osteoarthritis group, the 10-year survival rate was 94% (95% CI 81.8–100) in males and 100% (95% CI 100) for females; in the non-osteoarthritis group, the rate was 80% (95% CI 55.1–100) in males and 66.7% (95% CI 13.3–100) for females. In conclusion, this study showed good mid- to long-term clinical results for young Japanese osteoarthritis patients, with less satisfactory mid- to long-term results in patients without osteoarthritis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Yoon KS, Koo KH, Song WS, Kim HJ. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:530–5.CrossRefPubMed Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Yoon KS, Koo KH, Song WS, Kim HJ. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:530–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Shimmin A, Beaulé PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:637–54.CrossRefPubMed Shimmin A, Beaulé PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:637–54.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Carrothers AD, Gilbert RE, Jaiswal A, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1344–50.CrossRefPubMed Carrothers AD, Gilbert RE, Jaiswal A, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1344–50.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Corten K, MacDonald SJ. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:351–7.CrossRefPubMed Corten K, MacDonald SJ. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:351–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Seppänen M, Karvonen M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, et al. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:554–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seppänen M, Karvonen M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, et al. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:554–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis: 2- to 18-year results of the Conserve Plus design and technique. Bone Joint J. 2016;298-B:901–9.CrossRef Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis: 2- to 18-year results of the Conserve Plus design and technique. Bone Joint J. 2016;298-B:901–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nishi T, Sugano N, Miki H, Takao M, Koyama T, Yoshikawa H. Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:176–83.CrossRef Nishi T, Sugano N, Miki H, Takao M, Koyama T, Yoshikawa H. Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:176–83.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sugano N, Atsumi T, Ohzono K, Kubo T, Hotokebuchi T, TakaokaK. The 2001 revised criteria for diagnosis, classification, and staging of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7:601–5.CrossRefPubMed Sugano N, Atsumi T, Ohzono K, Kubo T, Hotokebuchi T, TakaokaK. The 2001 revised criteria for diagnosis, classification, and staging of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7:601–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shima Y. Standard for evaluation of osteoarthritis of the hip. Nippon Seiekeigekagakkai Zasshi. 1971;45:813–33. (in Japanese). Shima Y. Standard for evaluation of osteoarthritis of the hip. Nippon Seiekeigekagakkai Zasshi. 1971;45:813–33. (in Japanese).
11.
go back to reference Hauptfleisch J, Pandit H, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Murray DW, Ostlere S. A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:149–55.CrossRefPubMed Hauptfleisch J, Pandit H, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Murray DW, Ostlere S. A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:149–55.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2–12 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:375–81.CrossRefPubMed Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2–12 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:375–81.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop. 2011;35:231–7.CrossRefPubMed McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop. 2011;35:231–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1874–7.CrossRef Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1874–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Macpherson GJ, Breusch SJ. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:101–10.CrossRefPubMed Macpherson GJ, Breusch SJ. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:101–10.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Khan M, Kuiper JH, Edwards D, Robinson E, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1044–50.CrossRefPubMed Khan M, Kuiper JH, Edwards D, Robinson E, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1044–50.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Beaulé PE, Lee JL, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:2015–21. Beaulé PE, Lee JL, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:2015–21.
18.
go back to reference Zustin J, Sauter G, Morlock MM, Rüther W, Amling M. Association of osteonecrosis and failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:756–61.CrossRefPubMed Zustin J, Sauter G, Morlock MM, Rüther W, Amling M. Association of osteonecrosis and failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:756–61.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Campbell P, Beaulé PE, Ebramzadeh E, Le Duff MJ, De Smet K, Lu Z, et al. The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:35–46.CrossRefPubMed Campbell P, Beaulé PE, Ebramzadeh E, Le Duff MJ, De Smet K, Lu Z, et al. The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:35–46.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:847–51.CrossRefPubMed Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:847–51.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Canadian Hip Resurfacing Study Group. A survey on the prevalence of pseudotumors with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:118–21.CrossRef Canadian Hip Resurfacing Study Group. A survey on the prevalence of pseudotumors with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:118–21.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1566–74.CrossRefPubMed Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1566–74.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Webb J, Nargol AV. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1143–51.CrossRefPubMed Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Webb J, Nargol AV. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1143–51.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lombardi AV Jr, Barrack RL, Berend KR, Cuckler JM, Jacobs JJ, Mont MA, et al. The Hip Society: algorithmic approach to diagnosis and management of metal-on-metal arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:14–8.CrossRefPubMed Lombardi AV Jr, Barrack RL, Berend KR, Cuckler JM, Jacobs JJ, Mont MA, et al. The Hip Society: algorithmic approach to diagnosis and management of metal-on-metal arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:14–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sugano N, Iida H, Akiyama H, Takatori Y, Nagoya S, Hasegawa M, et al. Nationwide investigation into adverse tissue reactions to metal debris after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:85–9.CrossRefPubMed Sugano N, Iida H, Akiyama H, Takatori Y, Nagoya S, Hasegawa M, et al. Nationwide investigation into adverse tissue reactions to metal debris after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:85–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Macnair RD, Wynn-Jones H, Wimhurst JA, Toms A, Cahir J. Metal ion levels not sufficient as a screening measure for adverse reactions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:78–83.CrossRefPubMed Macnair RD, Wynn-Jones H, Wimhurst JA, Toms A, Cahir J. Metal ion levels not sufficient as a screening measure for adverse reactions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:78–83.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Chang EY, McAnally JL, Van Horne JR, Van Horne JG, Wolfson T, Gamst A, et al. Relationship of plasma metal ions and clinical and imaging findings in patients with ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am.;95:2015–20. Chang EY, McAnally JL, Van Horne JR, Van Horne JG, Wolfson T, Gamst A, et al. Relationship of plasma metal ions and clinical and imaging findings in patients with ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am.;95:2015–20.
Metadata
Title
Mid- to long-term results of resurfacing hip arthroplasty in Japanese patients: a comparison of osteoarthritic vs non-osteoarthritic patients
Authors
Daisuke Inoue
Tamon Kabata
Yoshitomo Kajino
Tomoharu Takagi
Takaaki Ohmori
Junya Yoshitani
Takuro Ueno
Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Artificial Organs / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1434-7229
Electronic ISSN: 1619-0904
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-018-1077-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Artificial Organs 1/2019 Go to the issue