Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2006

01-09-2006 | Knee

Mid-term results of arthroscopic reconstruction in chronic posterior cruciate ligament instability

Authors: J. M. G. T. Jenner, C. P. van der Hart, W. J. Willems

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 9/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic single bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in patients with chronic PCL instability not responding to conservative treatment. 18 patients were available for follow-up with an average elapsed time of 3 years between onset of injury and surgery and an average duration of 3.3 years between reconstruction and evaluation. The clinical results were investigated using the IKDC form, the Tegner rating system, a subjective evaluation, and the VAS for pain rating. The presence of femoral degenerative changes correlated strongly to the elapsed time between injury and operation (P<0.05). Before surgery all patients were graded D (severely abnormal) using the IKDC evaluation form. The final IKDC score at follow-up resulted in grade A (normal) in five patients (28%), grade B (nearly normal) in eight patients (44%), grade C (abnormal) in four patients (22%) and grade D (severely abnormal) in one patient (6%). The VAS score for pain rating revealed very few complaints of pain and it demonstrated a strong correlation between the subjective evaluation and the Tegner rating score (P<0.01). Evaluation of the Tegner score resulted in a significant improvement after surgery when compared to the situation prior to operation (P<0.01). Although there still is some controversy on the indication for treatment of PCL injury, we conclude on the basis of our findings that arthroscopic reconstruction of symptomatic chronic PCL instability, not responding to conservative therapy, can be greatly beneficial.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clancy WG Jr, et al (1983) Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(3):310–322PubMed Clancy WG Jr, et al (1983) Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(3):310–322PubMed
2.
go back to reference Fanelli GC, Edson CJ (1995) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients: Part II. Arthroscopy 11(5):526–529PubMedCrossRef Fanelli GC, Edson CJ (1995) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients: Part II. Arthroscopy 11(5):526–529PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (1999) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119(1–2):86–88CrossRefPubMed Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (1999) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119(1–2):86–88CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA (1986) Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 14(1):35–38PubMedCrossRef Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA (1986) Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 14(1):35–38PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV (1999) The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 27(3):276–283PubMed Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV (1999) The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 27(3):276–283PubMed
6.
go back to reference Keller PM, et al (1993) Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 21(1):132–136PubMedCrossRef Keller PM, et al (1993) Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 21(1):132–136PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fowler PJ, Messieh SS (1987) Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 15(6):553–557PubMedCrossRef Fowler PJ, Messieh SS (1987) Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 15(6):553–557PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Covey CD, Sapega AA (1993) Injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(9):1376–1386PubMed Covey CD, Sapega AA (1993) Injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(9):1376–1386PubMed
9.
go back to reference Harner CD, Hoher J (1998) Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 26(3):471–482PubMed Harner CD, Hoher J (1998) Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 26(3):471–482PubMed
10.
go back to reference Geissler WB, Whipple TL (1993) Intraarticular abnormalities in association with posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 21(6):846–849PubMedCrossRef Geissler WB, Whipple TL (1993) Intraarticular abnormalities in association with posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 21(6):846–849PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Richter M, et al (2002) Comparison of surgical repair or reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments versus nonsurgical treatment in patients with traumatic knee dislocations. Am J Sports Med 30(5):718–727PubMed Richter M, et al (2002) Comparison of surgical repair or reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments versus nonsurgical treatment in patients with traumatic knee dislocations. Am J Sports Med 30(5):718–727PubMed
12.
go back to reference Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? Reference landmarks for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13(3):325–331PubMedCrossRef Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? Reference landmarks for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13(3):325–331PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim SJ, et al (2000) Comparison of 1- and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 16(3):268–278PubMedCrossRef Kim SJ, et al (2000) Comparison of 1- and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 16(3):268–278PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mariani PP, et al (1997) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone patellar graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5(4):239–244CrossRefPubMed Mariani PP, et al (1997) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone patellar graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5(4):239–244CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mariani PP, Margheritini F, Camillieri G (2001) One-stage arthroscopically assisted anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17(7):700–707PubMedCrossRef Mariani PP, Margheritini F, Camillieri G (2001) One-stage arthroscopically assisted anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17(7):700–707PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Lazzara D (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon in chronic injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(5):266–273PubMed Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Lazzara D (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon in chronic injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(5):266–273PubMed
17.
go back to reference Harner CD, et al (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28(2):144–151PubMed Harner CD, et al (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28(2):144–151PubMed
18.
go back to reference Race A Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of ‘isometric’ versus single and double-bundled ‘anatomic’ grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(1):173–179CrossRefPubMed Race A Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of ‘isometric’ versus single and double-bundled ‘anatomic’ grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(1):173–179CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Giffin JR, et al (2002) Single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis. J Knee Surg 15(2):114–120PubMed Giffin JR, et al (2002) Single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis. J Knee Surg 15(2):114–120PubMed
20.
go back to reference Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2002) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 18(6):603–612PubMedCrossRef Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2002) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 18(6):603–612PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DN (2002) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(5):274–279PubMedCrossRef Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DN (2002) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(5):274–279PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hefti F, et al (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1(3–4):226–234CrossRefPubMed Hefti F, et al (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1(3–4):226–234CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Malanga GA, et al (2003) Physical examination of the knee: A review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(4):592–603CrossRefPubMed Malanga GA, et al (2003) Physical examination of the knee: A review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(4):592–603CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wang CJ, et al (2002) Outcome of surgical reconstruction for posterior cruciate and posterolateral instabilities of the knee. Injury 33(9):815–821CrossRefPubMed Wang CJ, et al (2002) Outcome of surgical reconstruction for posterior cruciate and posterolateral instabilities of the knee. Injury 33(9):815–821CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rubinstein RA Jr, et al (1994) The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 22(4):550–557PubMedCrossRef Rubinstein RA Jr, et al (1994) The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 22(4):550–557PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Miller MD, et al (1993) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Orthop Rev 22(11):1201–1210PubMed Miller MD, et al (1993) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Orthop Rev 22(11):1201–1210PubMed
27.
go back to reference Schultz WR, Carr CF (2002) Comparison of clinical outcomes of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: autogenous patellar tendon and hamstring grafts. Am J Orthop 31(11):613–620PubMed Schultz WR, Carr CF (2002) Comparison of clinical outcomes of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: autogenous patellar tendon and hamstring grafts. Am J Orthop 31(11):613–620PubMed
28.
go back to reference Wang CJ, et al (2004) Comparison of autogenous and allogenous posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee. Injury 35(12):1279–1285CrossRefPubMed Wang CJ, et al (2004) Comparison of autogenous and allogenous posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee. Injury 35(12):1279–1285CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Chen CH, et al (2004) Fixation strength of the different graft types used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(5):371–375PubMed Chen CH, et al (2004) Fixation strength of the different graft types used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(5):371–375PubMed
Metadata
Title
Mid-term results of arthroscopic reconstruction in chronic posterior cruciate ligament instability
Authors
J. M. G. T. Jenner
C. P. van der Hart
W. J. Willems
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0056-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2006

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2006 Go to the issue