Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 1/2020

01-03-2020 | Original Article

Methods in population study of orofacial injuries in Victorian family violence homicides

Authors: Reena Sarkar, Joan Ozanne-Smith, Richard Bassed

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

This study standardized the methods used in the determination of orofacial injuries in Victorian family violence homicides and informed potential control selection for an analytic study. Dental service contacts with family violence victims may be intervention avenues due to the presence of abusive injuries in the orofacial region. All Victorian family homicides from January 2000-September 2018 were identified by determining the kinship/relationship and grouped by age. A 20% random sample of adult cases, aged 18–64 years was selected. The median number of orofacial injuries in categories of injury mechanisms/age/gender and the nature of abusive orofacial injuries was reported for the sample. Of 357 closed cases of family homicide, 261 were adults aged 18–64 years. Offender information and injury mechanism data was available for all closed cases, enabling case selection. Of a random sample of 50 adults, 8 cases were excluded. After 2006, CT scans and photos were present in 20 (91%) and 19 (86.4%) of 22 cases, respectively. The nature and median number of orofacial injuries showed correlation to the reported injury mechanism. Strengths and limitations of the used methods were assessed. Not all cases were compatible for assessment of orofacial injuries, thus serving as an additional criterion for exclusion in our methodology. Further detailed study of the whole population of adults should be limited to the period 2006–2018 where the data is more complete. The mechanism of injury may influence control selection for analytic studies. We present preliminary evidence of the frequent occurrence of orofacial injuries in family violence homicides.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Leathers R, Le AD, Black E, McQuirter JL. Orofacial injury in underserved minority populations. Dent Clin N Am. 2003;47:127–39.CrossRef Leathers R, Le AD, Black E, McQuirter JL. Orofacial injury in underserved minority populations. Dent Clin N Am. 2003;47:127–39.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sterzik V, Duckwitz D, Bohnert M. Accident or crime? About the meaning of face injuries inflicted by blunt force. Forensic Sci Res. 2016;1:14–21.CrossRef Sterzik V, Duckwitz D, Bohnert M. Accident or crime? About the meaning of face injuries inflicted by blunt force. Forensic Sci Res. 2016;1:14–21.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Caldas IM, Grams AC, Afonso A, Magalhaes T. Oral injuries in victims involving intimate partner violence. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;221:102–5.CrossRef Caldas IM, Grams AC, Afonso A, Magalhaes T. Oral injuries in victims involving intimate partner violence. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;221:102–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lee BT, Dierks EJ, Ueeck BA, Homer LD, Potter BF. Maxillofacial injuries associated with domestic violence. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:1227–83. Lee BT, Dierks EJ, Ueeck BA, Homer LD, Potter BF. Maxillofacial injuries associated with domestic violence. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:1227–83.
7.
go back to reference Saddki N, Suhaimi AA, Daud R. Maxillofacial injuries associated with intimate partner violence in women. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:268.CrossRef Saddki N, Suhaimi AA, Daud R. Maxillofacial injuries associated with intimate partner violence in women. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:268.CrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Aved BM, Meyers L, Burmas EL. Challenging dentistry to recognize and respond to family violence. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35:553–63. Aved BM, Meyers L, Burmas EL. Challenging dentistry to recognize and respond to family violence. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35:553–63.
10.
go back to reference Tilden VP, Schmidt TA, Limandri BJ, Chiodo GT, Garland MJ, Loveless PA. Factors that influence clinicians’ assessment and management of family violence. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:628–33.CrossRef Tilden VP, Schmidt TA, Limandri BJ, Chiodo GT, Garland MJ, Loveless PA. Factors that influence clinicians’ assessment and management of family violence. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:628–33.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Little K. Family violence: an intervention model for dental professionals. US Department of Justice. Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) Bulletin. 2004. p. 1-11. Little K. Family violence: an intervention model for dental professionals. US Department of Justice. Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) Bulletin. 2004. p. 1-11.
12.
go back to reference Lincoln HS, Lincoln MJ. Role of the odontologist in the investigation of domestic violence, neglect of the vulnerable, and the institutional violence and torture. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201:68–73.CrossRef Lincoln HS, Lincoln MJ. Role of the odontologist in the investigation of domestic violence, neglect of the vulnerable, and the institutional violence and torture. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201:68–73.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD007007. O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD007007.
15.
go back to reference Halberg IR. Surveys. In: Watson R, McKenna H, Cowman S, Keady J, editors. Nursing research: designs and methods. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 179–87. Halberg IR. Surveys. In: Watson R, McKenna H, Cowman S, Keady J, editors. Nursing research: designs and methods. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 179–87.
16.
go back to reference Kim Y. The pilot study in qualitative inquiry. Qual Soc Work. 2011;10:190–206.CrossRef Kim Y. The pilot study in qualitative inquiry. Qual Soc Work. 2011;10:190–206.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Heale R, Forbes D. Understanding triangulation in research. Evid Based Nurs. 2013;16:98.CrossRef Heale R, Forbes D. Understanding triangulation in research. Evid Based Nurs. 2013;16:98.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10:307–12.CrossRef Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10:307–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Doody O, Doody CM. Conducting a pilot study: case study of a novice researcher. Br J Nurs. 2015;24:1074–8.CrossRef Doody O, Doody CM. Conducting a pilot study: case study of a novice researcher. Br J Nurs. 2015;24:1074–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1.CrossRef Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.CrossRef Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bugeja L, Butler A, Buxton E, Ehrat H, Hayes M, McIntyre SJ, et al. The implementation of domestic violence deaths reviews in Australia. Homicide Stud. 2013;17:353–74.CrossRef Bugeja L, Butler A, Buxton E, Ehrat H, Hayes M, McIntyre SJ, et al. The implementation of domestic violence deaths reviews in Australia. Homicide Stud. 2013;17:353–74.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cocks K, Torgerson DJ. Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:197–201.CrossRef Cocks K, Torgerson DJ. Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:197–201.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:301–8.CrossRef Sim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:301–8.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Saukko P, Knight B. The pathology of wounds. In: Saukko P, Knight B, editors. Knight's forensic pathology, 3rd ed. Abingdon: CRC Press; 2004. p. 136–723.CrossRef Saukko P, Knight B. The pathology of wounds. In: Saukko P, Knight B, editors. Knight's forensic pathology, 3rd ed. Abingdon: CRC Press; 2004. p. 136–723.CrossRef
32.
36.
go back to reference Walker PL, Cook DC, Lambert PM. Skeletal evidence for child abuse: a physical anthropological perspective. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42:196–207.CrossRef Walker PL, Cook DC, Lambert PM. Skeletal evidence for child abuse: a physical anthropological perspective. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42:196–207.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Methods in population study of orofacial injuries in Victorian family violence homicides
Authors
Reena Sarkar
Joan Ozanne-Smith
Richard Bassed
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-019-00183-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 1/2020 Go to the issue