Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Metastasis | Original Article

A real-world, population-based study of the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the peritoneum treated with or without cytoreductive surgery

Author: Omar Abdel-Rahman

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess the outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer patients with isolated peritoneal metastasis who were treated with or without cytoreductive surgery in a contemporary real-world, population-based cohort.

Methods

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database has been accessed and metastatic colorectal cancer patients to the peritoneum who have no evidence of other sites of distant metastases and who were diagnosed 2010–2015 were reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then used to assess the patient- and treatment-related factors predicting the decision to do cytoreductive surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to compare overall survival according to cytoreductive surgery. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was additionally used to assess the impact of cytoreductive surgery on colorectal cancer-specific survival.

Results

A total of 3153 records were reviewed in the current analysis. Using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, cytoreductive surgery was associated with improved overall survival (median overall survival, 19 months for patients with cytoreductive surgery versus 12 months for patients without cytoreductive surgery; P < 0.001). In an adjusted Cox regression model evaluating the impact of cytoreductive surgery on colorectal cancer-specific survival, cytoreductive surgery was associated with better colorectal cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio for death among patients who did not have cytoreductive surgery versus patients who had cytoreductive surgery, 1.312; 95% CI, 1.175–1.465; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Cytoreductive surgery is associated with improved survival outcomes among colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and no evidence of other distant metastases. Opimal utilization of this intervention needs to be further evaluated in prospective controlled trials.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Cederquist L, Chan E, Chen YJ, Cooper HS et al (2017) Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15(3):370–398CrossRef Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Cederquist L, Chan E, Chen YJ, Cooper HS et al (2017) Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15(3):370–398CrossRef
3.
go back to reference van de Velde CJ, Aristei C, Boelens PG, Beets-Tan RG, Blomqvist L, Borras JM, van den Broek C, Brown G, Coebergh JW, Cutsem EV, Espin E, Gore-Booth J, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, Henning G, Iversen LH, Han van Krieken J, Marijnen CA, Mroczkowski P, Nagtegaal I, Naredi P, Ortiz H, Påhlman L, Quirke P, Rödel C, Roth A, Rutten HJ, Schmoll HJ, Smith J, Tanis PJ, Taylor C, Wibe A, Gambacorta MA, Meldolesi E, Wiggers T, Cervantes A, Valentini V, European Registration of Cancer Care (2013) EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary mission statement on better care for patients with colon and rectal cancer in Europe. Eur J Cancer 49(13):2784–2790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.032 CrossRefPubMed van de Velde CJ, Aristei C, Boelens PG, Beets-Tan RG, Blomqvist L, Borras JM, van den Broek C, Brown G, Coebergh JW, Cutsem EV, Espin E, Gore-Booth J, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, Henning G, Iversen LH, Han van Krieken J, Marijnen CA, Mroczkowski P, Nagtegaal I, Naredi P, Ortiz H, Påhlman L, Quirke P, Rödel C, Roth A, Rutten HJ, Schmoll HJ, Smith J, Tanis PJ, Taylor C, Wibe A, Gambacorta MA, Meldolesi E, Wiggers T, Cervantes A, Valentini V, European Registration of Cancer Care (2013) EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary mission statement on better care for patients with colon and rectal cancer in Europe. Eur J Cancer 49(13):2784–2790. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2013.​04.​032 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Custom Data (with additional treatment fields), Nov 2018 Sub (1975-2016 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2017 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2019, based on the November 2018 submission Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.​seer.​cancer.​gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Custom Data (with additional treatment fields), Nov 2018 Sub (1975-2016 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2017 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2019, based on the November 2018 submission
Metadata
Title
A real-world, population-based study of the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the peritoneum treated with or without cytoreductive surgery
Author
Omar Abdel-Rahman
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03525-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2020 Go to the issue