Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Metastasis | Brief Research Article

Axillary nodal involvement by primary tumor features in early breast cancer: an analysis of 2600 patients

Authors: M. C. De Santis, E. La Rocca, E. Meneghini, G. Bregni, G. Di Lorenzo, G. Galli, M. Di Nicola, S. Folli, M. Gennaro, G. Pruneri, B. Paolini, M. G. Daidone, F. De Braud, G. Apolone, M. Sant, S. Di Cosimo

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Primary tumor characteristics, which are readily available to all clinicians, may aid in selecting the optimal adjuvant therapy for patients with breast cancer (BC). Herein, we investigated the relationship between tumor size, hormone receptor and HER2 status, Ki67 and age with axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) in early-BC patients.

Methods

We analyzed data on consecutive 2600 early-BC cases collected in the registry of Fondazione IRCC Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy. Correlation between Ki67 and primary tumor size (T-size) was calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Association of ALNM with Ki67 and other tumor characteristics was investigated by logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated in all cases, and separately analyzed according to age, T-size and BC subtype.

Results

Large tumor size strongly associated to ALNM, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for each 5-mm increase of 1.32 (95% CI 1.24–1.41), except for triple-negative BC (TNBC) cases. In tumors =10 mm, without lymphovascular invasion, representing the strongest predictor of ALNM (OR 6.09, 95% CI 4.93–7.53), Ki67 resulted particularly informative, with a fourfold increased odds of ALNM for values > 30%.

Conclusions

These results raise the question whether axillary node status is redundant in cases with exceptionally good features, i.e., small tumors with low Ki67, or in those candidate to adjuvant systemic treatment/radiotherapy anyway including TNBC, and support the incorporation of primary BC tumor characteristics as stratification factors in ongoing trials aiming at de-escalating axillary surgical procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415:530–6.CrossRef van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415:530–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Viale G., Regan M.M., Maiorano E., Mastropasqua M.G., Dell’Orto P., Brun Rasmussen B, et al, Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1–98. J. Clin. Oncol. 25 (2007) 3846–3852. Viale G., Regan M.M., Maiorano E., Mastropasqua M.G., Dell’Orto P., Brun Rasmussen B, et al, Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1–98. J. Clin. Oncol. 25 (2007) 3846–3852.
3.
go back to reference Purdie CA, Quinlan P, Jordan LB, Ashfiled A, Ogston S, Dewar JA, et al. Progesterone receptor expression is an independent prognostic variable in early breast cancer: a population-based study. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110:565–72.CrossRef Purdie CA, Quinlan P, Jordan LB, Ashfiled A, Ogston S, Dewar JA, et al. Progesterone receptor expression is an independent prognostic variable in early breast cancer: a population-based study. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110:565–72.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bardou VJ, Arpino G, Elledge RM, Osborne CK, Clark GM. Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21:1973–9.CrossRef Bardou VJ, Arpino G, Elledge RM, Osborne CK, Clark GM. Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21:1973–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cooke T, Reeves J, Lanigan A, Stanton P. HER2 as a prognostic and predictive marker for breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2001;12:S23–S2828.CrossRef Cooke T, Reeves J, Lanigan A, Stanton P. HER2 as a prognostic and predictive marker for breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2001;12:S23–S2828.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:783–92.CrossRef Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:783–92.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Denkert C, Budczies J, von Minckwitz G, Wienert S, Loibl S, Klauschen F. Strategies for developing Ki67 as a useful biomarker in breast cancer. Breast. 2015;24:S67–S72.CrossRef Denkert C, Budczies J, von Minckwitz G, Wienert S, Loibl S, Klauschen F. Strategies for developing Ki67 as a useful biomarker in breast cancer. Breast. 2015;24:S67–S72.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pathmanathan N, Balleine RL, Jayasinghe UW, Bilinski KL, Provan PJ, Byth K, et al. The prognostic value of Ki67 in systemically untreated patients with node-negative breast cancer. J. Clin. Pathol. 2014;67:222–8.CrossRef Pathmanathan N, Balleine RL, Jayasinghe UW, Bilinski KL, Provan PJ, Byth K, et al. The prognostic value of Ki67 in systemically untreated patients with node-negative breast cancer. J. Clin. Pathol. 2014;67:222–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, A’Hern R, Bartlett J, Coombes RC, Cuzick J, et al. Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 2011;103:1–9.CrossRef Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, A’Hern R, Bartlett J, Coombes RC, Cuzick J, et al. Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 2011;103:1–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Coates A.S., Winer E.P., Goldhirsch A., Gelber R.D., Gnant M., Piccart-Gebhart M., et al, Tailoring therapies-improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015, Ann. Oncol. 26 (2015) 1533–1546. Coates A.S., Winer E.P., Goldhirsch A., Gelber R.D., Gnant M., Piccart-Gebhart M., et al, Tailoring therapies-improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015, Ann. Oncol. 26 (2015) 1533–1546.
11.
go back to reference Baili P, Torresani M, Agresti R, Rosito G, Daidone MG, Veneroni S, et al. A breast cancer clinical registry in an Italian comprehensive cancer center: an instrument for descriptive, clinical, and experimental research. Tumori. 2015;101:440–6.CrossRef Baili P, Torresani M, Agresti R, Rosito G, Daidone MG, Veneroni S, et al. A breast cancer clinical registry in an Italian comprehensive cancer center: an instrument for descriptive, clinical, and experimental research. Tumori. 2015;101:440–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind CH. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2010. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind CH. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2010.
13.
go back to reference Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:2784–95.CrossRef Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:2784–95.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Fey JV, Cody HS 3rd, Van Borgen PI, Van, Zee KJ, Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:3670–9.CrossRef Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Fey JV, Cody HS 3rd, Van Borgen PI, Van, Zee KJ, Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:3670–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lakhanpal R, Sestak I, Shadbolt B, Bennett GM, Brown M, Phillips T, et al. IHC4 score plus clinical treatment score predicts locoregional recurrence in early breast cancer. Breast. 2016;29:147–52.CrossRef Lakhanpal R, Sestak I, Shadbolt B, Bennett GM, Brown M, Phillips T, et al. IHC4 score plus clinical treatment score predicts locoregional recurrence in early breast cancer. Breast. 2016;29:147–52.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Selz J, Stevens D, Jouanneau L, Labib A, Le Scodan R. Prognostic value of molecular subtypes, ki67 expression and impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes after mastectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:1123–32.CrossRef Selz J, Stevens D, Jouanneau L, Labib A, Le Scodan R. Prognostic value of molecular subtypes, ki67 expression and impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes after mastectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:1123–32.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Thangarajah F, Malter W, Hamacher S, Schmidt M, Krämer S, Mallmann P, et al. Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer-radioactivity and Ki-67. The Breast. 2016;30:87–91.CrossRef Thangarajah F, Malter W, Hamacher S, Schmidt M, Krämer S, Mallmann P, et al. Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer-radioactivity and Ki-67. The Breast. 2016;30:87–91.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyer A. Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin. Oncol. 2009;36:237–49.CrossRef Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyer A. Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin. Oncol. 2009;36:237–49.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Liu N, Yang Z, Liu X, Niu Y. Lymph node status in different molecular subtype of breast cancer: triple negative tumors are more likely lymph node negative. Oncotarget. 2017;33:55534–43. Liu N, Yang Z, Liu X, Niu Y. Lymph node status in different molecular subtype of breast cancer: triple negative tumors are more likely lymph node negative. Oncotarget. 2017;33:55534–43.
21.
go back to reference Guo LW, Jiang LM, Gong Y, Zhang HH, Li XG, He M, et al. Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall and breast cancer specific survival among patients with triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:5881–944.CrossRef Guo LW, Jiang LM, Gong Y, Zhang HH, Li XG, He M, et al. Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall and breast cancer specific survival among patients with triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:5881–944.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference van Roozendaal LM, Smit LHM, Duijsens GHNM, de Vries B, Siesling S, Lobbes MBI. wt al, Risk of regional recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer patients: a Dutch cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016;156:465–72.CrossRef van Roozendaal LM, Smit LHM, Duijsens GHNM, de Vries B, Siesling S, Lobbes MBI. wt al, Risk of regional recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer patients: a Dutch cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016;156:465–72.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Axillary nodal involvement by primary tumor features in early breast cancer: an analysis of 2600 patients
Authors
M. C. De Santis
E. La Rocca
E. Meneghini
G. Bregni
G. Di Lorenzo
G. Galli
M. Di Nicola
S. Folli
M. Gennaro
G. Pruneri
B. Paolini
M. G. Daidone
F. De Braud
G. Apolone
M. Sant
S. Di Cosimo
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02188-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Clinical and Translational Oncology 5/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine