Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Knee Revision Surgery

Metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty revision: complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature

Authors: Andrea Zanirato, Luca Cavagnaro, Marco Basso, Stefano Divano, Lamberto Felli, Matteo Formica

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty revision (TKAr) is increasing of relevance in orthopaedic surgeon daily practice and will become more and more relevant in the future. The aim of this study is to summarize indications, complications, clinical and radiological mid-term results of metaphyseal sleeves in management of bone defects in TKAr.

Methods

A systematic review of English literature was performed on Medline. Retrospective or prospective studies with 2 years of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Rates of intraoperative fractures, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), reoperations and re-revisions were extrapolated by the papers.

Results

13 articles with a level of evidence of IV were included in the systematic review. 1079 TKAr (1554 sleeves) with a mean FU of 4.0 ± 1.1 years were analysed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Sleeves allowed a stable metaphyseal fixation and osseointegration with an implant and sleeves aseptic survival rate of 97.7 and 99.2%, respectively. The incidence of PJI was 2.7 ± 2.4%. The estimated rate of reoperations and re-revisions were 14.2 ± 9.2 and 7.1 ± 4.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

Metaphyseal sleeves represent a viable option in management of types IIb and III AORI bone defects in TKAr. Further high-quality log-term studies would better clarify complications, clinical and radiological results of this promising technique in total knee arthroplasty revision.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780PubMed Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780PubMed
2.
go back to reference National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland (2015) 13th Annual Report 2015 National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland (2015) 13th Annual Report 2015
3.
go back to reference Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E et al. (2017) Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed 88(2-S): 98–111PubMed Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E et al. (2017) Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed 88(2-S): 98–111PubMed
4.
go back to reference Chalmers BP, Desy NM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Taunton MJ (2017) Survivorship metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(5):1565–1570CrossRefPubMed Chalmers BP, Desy NM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Taunton MJ (2017) Survivorship metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(5):1565–1570CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dalury DF, Barrett WP (2016) The use of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee 23(3):545–548CrossRefPubMed Dalury DF, Barrett WP (2016) The use of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee 23(3):545–548CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Alexander GE, Bernasek TL, Crank RL, Haidukewych GJ (2013) Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty Apr 28(4):604–607CrossRefPubMed Alexander GE, Bernasek TL, Crank RL, Haidukewych GJ (2013) Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty Apr 28(4):604–607CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Huang R, Barrazueta G, Ong A, Orozco F, Jafari M, Coyle C, Austin M (2014) Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up. Orthopedics Sep 37(9):e804-9 Huang R, Barrazueta G, Ong A, Orozco F, Jafari M, Coyle C, Austin M (2014) Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up. Orthopedics Sep 37(9):e804-9
9.
go back to reference Agarwal S, Azam A, Morgan-Jones R (2013) Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95-B(12):1640–1644CrossRefPubMed Agarwal S, Azam A, Morgan-Jones R (2013) Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95-B(12):1640–1644CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Barnett SL, Mayer RR, Gondusky JS, Choi L, Patel JJ, Gorab RS (2014) Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results. J Arthroplasty Jun 29(6):1219–1224CrossRefPubMed Barnett SL, Mayer RR, Gondusky JS, Choi L, Patel JJ, Gorab RS (2014) Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results. J Arthroplasty Jun 29(6):1219–1224CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bugler KE, Maheshwari R, Ahmed I, Brenkel IJ, Walmsley PJ (2015) Metaphyseal sleeves for revision total knee arthroplasty: good short-term outcomes. Arthroplasty 30(11):1990–1994CrossRef Bugler KE, Maheshwari R, Ahmed I, Brenkel IJ, Walmsley PJ (2015) Metaphyseal sleeves for revision total knee arthroplasty: good short-term outcomes. Arthroplasty 30(11):1990–1994CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gøttsche D, Lind T, Christiansen T, Schrøder HM (2016) Cementless metaphyseal sleeves without stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(12):1761–1766CrossRefPubMed Gøttsche D, Lind T, Christiansen T, Schrøder HM (2016) Cementless metaphyseal sleeves without stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(12):1761–1766CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Graichen H, Scior W, Strauch M (2015) Direct, cementless, metaphyseal fixation in knee revision arthroplasty with sleeves-short-term results. J Arthroplasty 30(12):2256–2259CrossRefPubMed Graichen H, Scior W, Strauch M (2015) Direct, cementless, metaphyseal fixation in knee revision arthroplasty with sleeves-short-term results. J Arthroplasty 30(12):2256–2259CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jones RE, Barrack RL, Skedros J (2001) Modular, mobile-bearing hinge total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res Nov;(392):306–314 Jones RE, Barrack RL, Skedros J (2001) Modular, mobile-bearing hinge total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res Nov;(392):306–314
16.
go back to reference Martin-Hernandez C, Floria-Arnal LJ, Muniesa-Herrero MP et al (2017) Mid-term results for metaphyseal sleeves in revision knee surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(12):3779–3785CrossRefPubMed Martin-Hernandez C, Floria-Arnal LJ, Muniesa-Herrero MP et al (2017) Mid-term results for metaphyseal sleeves in revision knee surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(12):3779–3785CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Watters TS, Martin JR, Levy DL, Yang CC, Kim RH, Dennis DA (2017) Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA. J Arthroplasty S0883-5403(17):3468–3473CrossRef Watters TS, Martin JR, Levy DL, Yang CC, Kim RH, Dennis DA (2017) Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA. J Arthroplasty S0883-5403(17):3468–3473CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Insta Course Lect 46:227–236 Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Insta Course Lect 46:227–236
19.
go back to reference Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107e28 Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107e28
20.
go back to reference Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12 Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12
21.
go back to reference Formica M, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Zanirato A, Palermo A, Felli L (2017) What is the fate of the neck after a collum femoris preserving prosthesis? A nineteen years single center experience. Int Orthop 41(7):1329–1335CrossRefPubMed Formica M, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Zanirato A, Palermo A, Felli L (2017) What is the fate of the neck after a collum femoris preserving prosthesis? A nineteen years single center experience. Int Orthop 41(7):1329–1335CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sanguineti F, Mangano T, Formica M, Franchin F (2014) Total knee arthroplasty with rotating-hinge endo-model prosthesis: clinical results in complex primary and revision surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(11):1601–1607CrossRefPubMed Sanguineti F, Mangano T, Formica M, Franchin F (2014) Total knee arthroplasty with rotating-hinge endo-model prosthesis: clinical results in complex primary and revision surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(11):1601–1607CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cavagnaro L, Formica M, Basso M, Zanirato A, Divano S, Felli L (2017) Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 102(1):1–9 Cavagnaro L, Formica M, Basso M, Zanirato A, Divano S, Felli L (2017) Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 102(1):1–9
24.
go back to reference Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik S, Graichen H, Haddad F (2015) A zonal fixation classification in revision total knee arthroplasty: a methodology to aid reconstruction, fixation and implant survival. Bone Joint J (accepted for publication) Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik S, Graichen H, Haddad F (2015) A zonal fixation classification in revision total knee arthroplasty: a methodology to aid reconstruction, fixation and implant survival. Bone Joint J (accepted for publication)
25.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Olekson C et al (2003) Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:217CrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Olekson C et al (2003) Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:217CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C et al (2001) Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty 16:107CrossRefPubMed Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C et al (2001) Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty 16:107CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Rorabeck C, Burt M et al (1999) Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:216CrossRef Barrack RL, Rorabeck C, Burt M et al (1999) Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:216CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Stanley T, Burt M et al (2004) The effect of stem design on end-of stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:119CrossRefPubMed Barrack RL, Stanley T, Burt M et al (2004) The effect of stem design on end-of stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:119CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty revision: complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature
Authors
Andrea Zanirato
Luca Cavagnaro
Marco Basso
Stefano Divano
Lamberto Felli
Matteo Formica
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2967-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 7/2018 Go to the issue