Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Article

Meta-analysis of the association between progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer

Authors: Costel Chirila, Dawn Odom, Giovanna Devercelli, Shahnaz Khan, Bintu N. Sherif, James A. Kaye, István Molnár, Beth Sherrill

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The validity of progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) trials has been studied, primarily in first-line treatment. The relationship between PFS and OS has not been well studied in later lines of treatment.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review of mCRC phase 2 and 3 clinical trials that reported OS and PFS (or time-to-progression [TTP]) data. Correlation between endpoints (either PFS alone or PFS aggregated with TTP [PFS_TTP]) was estimated within treatment arms. Treatment effect was the ratio of the median time to OS, PFS, or PFS_TTP in the “control” versus “experimental” arm. We conducted meta-regression analyses and performed receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

We analyzed data from 62 articles (23,527 patients). A high positive correlation was found between median PFS_TTP and median OS within treatment arms (r = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82–0.91) and also between the median OS and median PFS (r = 0.89, 95% CI, 0.83–0.93)]. R 2 was 0.48 for PFS_TTP and 0.59 for PFS; R 2 for PFS_TTP was higher for first-line (R 2 = 0.54) than second-line studies (R 2 = 0.38). The ROC analysis is presented as a conceptual tool for evaluating the performance of PFS as a surrogate for OS at various thresholds.

Conclusions

The correlation of PFS, alone or aggregated with TTP, with OS in clinical trials of patients with mCRC is robust across lines of therapy and provides a useful means of predicting improvements in OS using PFS data.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson JR, Williams G, Pazdur R (2003) End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs. J Clin Oncol 21:1404–1411PubMedCrossRef Johnson JR, Williams G, Pazdur R (2003) End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs. J Clin Oncol 21:1404–1411PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fleming TR, Rothmann MD, Lu HL (2009) Issues in using progression-free survival when evaluating oncology products. J Clin Oncol 27:2874–2880PubMedCrossRef Fleming TR, Rothmann MD, Lu HL (2009) Issues in using progression-free survival when evaluating oncology products. J Clin Oncol 27:2874–2880PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Saad ED, Katz A, Hoff PM, Buyse M (2010) Progression-free survival as surrogate and as true end point: insights from the breast and colorectal cancer literature. Ann Oncol 21:7–12PubMedCrossRef Saad ED, Katz A, Hoff PM, Buyse M (2010) Progression-free survival as surrogate and as true end point: insights from the breast and colorectal cancer literature. Ann Oncol 21:7–12PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Prentice RL (1989) Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med 8:431–440PubMedCrossRef Prentice RL (1989) Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med 8:431–440PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Freedman LS, Graubard BI, Schatzkin A (1992) Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Stat Med 11:167–178PubMedCrossRef Freedman LS, Graubard BI, Schatzkin A (1992) Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Stat Med 11:167–178PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Buyse M, Molenberghs G (1998) Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments. Biometrics 54:1014–1029PubMedCrossRef Buyse M, Molenberghs G (1998) Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments. Biometrics 54:1014–1029PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shi Q, Sargent D (2009) Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials. Int J Clin Oncol 14:102–111PubMedCrossRef Shi Q, Sargent D (2009) Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials. Int J Clin Oncol 14:102–111PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Buyse M, Molenberghs G, Burzykowski T, Renard D, Geys H (2000) The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments. Biostatistics 1:49–67PubMedCrossRef Buyse M, Molenberghs G, Burzykowski T, Renard D, Geys H (2000) The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments. Biostatistics 1:49–67PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Louvet C, de Gramont A, Tournigand C, Artru P, Maindrault-Goebel F, Krulik M (2001) Correlation between progression free survival and response rate in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 91:2033–2038PubMedCrossRef Louvet C, de Gramont A, Tournigand C, Artru P, Maindrault-Goebel F, Krulik M (2001) Correlation between progression free survival and response rate in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 91:2033–2038PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tang PA, Bentzen SM, Chen EX, Siu LL (2007) Surrogate end points for median overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature-based analysis from 39 randomized controlled trials of first-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4562–4568PubMedCrossRef Tang PA, Bentzen SM, Chen EX, Siu LL (2007) Surrogate end points for median overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature-based analysis from 39 randomized controlled trials of first-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4562–4568PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Buyse M, Burzykowsky T, Caroll K et al (2007) Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5218–5224PubMedCrossRef Buyse M, Burzykowsky T, Caroll K et al (2007) Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5218–5224PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Buyse M, Thirion P, Carlson RW, Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Piedbois P (2000) Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Lancet 356:373–378PubMedCrossRef Buyse M, Thirion P, Carlson RW, Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Piedbois P (2000) Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Lancet 356:373–378PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Johnson KR, Ringland C, Stokes BJ et al (2006) Response rate or time to progression as predictors of survival in trials of metastatic colorectal cancer or non–small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 7:741–746PubMedCrossRef Johnson KR, Ringland C, Stokes BJ et al (2006) Response rate or time to progression as predictors of survival in trials of metastatic colorectal cancer or non–small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 7:741–746PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Haller DG et al (2005) Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 23:8664–8670PubMedCrossRef Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Haller DG et al (2005) Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 23:8664–8670PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sherrill B, Amonkar M, Wu Y et al (2008) Relationship between effects on time-to-disease progression and overall survival in studies of metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 99:1572–1578PubMedCrossRef Sherrill B, Amonkar M, Wu Y et al (2008) Relationship between effects on time-to-disease progression and overall survival in studies of metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 99:1572–1578PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2005) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Wiley, Chichester Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2005) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Wiley, Chichester
17.
go back to reference Kabbinavar F, Hurwitz HI, Fehrenbacher L et al (2003) Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:60–65PubMedCrossRef Kabbinavar F, Hurwitz HI, Fehrenbacher L et al (2003) Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:60–65PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Underhill C, Goldstein D, Gorbounova VA et al (2007) A randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed plus irinotecan (ALIRI) versus leucovorin-modulated 5-FU plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncology 73:9–20PubMedCrossRef Underhill C, Goldstein D, Gorbounova VA et al (2007) A randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed plus irinotecan (ALIRI) versus leucovorin-modulated 5-FU plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncology 73:9–20PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S et al (2007) Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:1658–1664PubMedCrossRef Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S et al (2007) Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:1658–1664PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hecht JR, Mitchell E, Chidiac T et al (2009) A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:672–680PubMedCrossRef Hecht JR, Mitchell E, Chidiac T et al (2009) A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:672–680PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E et al (2007) Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC-C Study. J Clin Oncol 25:4779–4786PubMedCrossRef Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E et al (2007) Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC-C Study. J Clin Oncol 25:4779–4786PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kemeny N, Garay CA, Gurtler J et al (2004) Randomized multicenter phase II trial of bolus plus infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin compared with fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin as third-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:4753–4761PubMedCrossRef Kemeny N, Garay CA, Gurtler J et al (2004) Randomized multicenter phase II trial of bolus plus infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin compared with fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin as third-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:4753–4761PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tsujino K, Kawaguchi T, Kubo A et al (2009) Response rate is associated with prolonged survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. J Thorac Oncol 4:994–1001PubMedCrossRef Tsujino K, Kawaguchi T, Kubo A et al (2009) Response rate is associated with prolonged survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. J Thorac Oncol 4:994–1001PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Meta-analysis of the association between progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer
Authors
Costel Chirila
Dawn Odom
Giovanna Devercelli
Shahnaz Khan
Bintu N. Sherif
James A. Kaye
István Molnár
Beth Sherrill
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1349-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2012 Go to the issue