Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Meningioma | Research article

Time optimization of gadobutrol-enhanced brain MRI for metastases and primary tumors using a dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging

Authors: Jeemin Seo, Changmok Lim, Kye Young Lee, Young-Cho Koh, Won-Jin Moon

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent advances in rapid imaging techniques necessitate the reconsideration of the optimal imaging delay time for contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. The aim of our study was to determine the optimal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging delay time from the obtained time-signal intensity curve (TIC) using gadobutrol in patients with brain metastases, primary brain tumors, and meningiomas.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 78 patients with brain metastases (n = 39), primary brain tumors (n = 22), or meningiomas (n = 17) who underwent 7-min dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging with single-dose gadobutrol. Based on the time-to-peak (TTP) derived from the TIC, we selected four different time points for analysis. Lesion conspicuity, enhanced rate (ER) and contrast rate (CR) of 116 index lesions were evaluated. Statistical comparisons were made for the four different time points using the Friedman test.

Results

Maximum TTP (305.20 ± 63.47 s) was similar across all three groups (p = 0.342). Lesion conspicuity, CR and ER increased over time in all index lesions; however, no significant difference between the 5- and 7-min images was observed. The longest diameter in all groups differed significantly among time points (p < 0.001); the perpendicular diameter did not differ between the 5- and 7-min images.

Conclusions

Maximum contrast enhancement and lesion conspicuity was achieved 5–7 min after a single gadobutrol injection for brain metastases detection and for primary brain tumor/meningioma evaluation. Acquiring images 5 min after gadobutrol injection is the optimal timing for brain tumor detection during MRI work-up.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Choi JW, Moon W-J. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: current updates. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20:66.CrossRef Choi JW, Moon W-J. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: current updates. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20:66.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim ES, Chang JH, Choi HS, Kim J, Lee SK. Diagnostic yield of double-dose gadobutrol in the detection of brain metastasis: intraindividual comparison with double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1055–8.CrossRef Kim ES, Chang JH, Choi HS, Kim J, Lee SK. Diagnostic yield of double-dose gadobutrol in the detection of brain metastasis: intraindividual comparison with double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1055–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Attenberger UI, Runge VM, Jackson CB, et al. Comparative evaluation of lesion enhancement using 1 M gadobutrol vs. 2 conventional gadolinium chelates, all at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, in a rat brain tumor model at 3 T. Invest Radiol 2009;44:251–6. Attenberger UI, Runge VM, Jackson CB, et al. Comparative evaluation of lesion enhancement using 1 M gadobutrol vs. 2 conventional gadolinium chelates, all at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, in a rat brain tumor model at 3 T. Invest Radiol 2009;44:251–6.
4.
go back to reference Artzi M, Bressler I, Ben BD. Differentiation between glioblastoma, brain metastasis and subtypes using radiomics analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50:519–28.CrossRef Artzi M, Bressler I, Ben BD. Differentiation between glioblastoma, brain metastasis and subtypes using radiomics analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50:519–28.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee MD, Baird GL, Bell LC, Quarles CC, Boxerman JL. Utility of percentage signal recovery and baseline signal in DSC-MRI optimized for relative CBV measurement for differentiating glioblastoma, lymphoma, metastasis, and meningioma. Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1445–50.PubMedPubMedCentral Lee MD, Baird GL, Bell LC, Quarles CC, Boxerman JL. Utility of percentage signal recovery and baseline signal in DSC-MRI optimized for relative CBV measurement for differentiating glioblastoma, lymphoma, metastasis, and meningioma. Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1445–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Park JE, Kim HS. Current applications and future perspectives of brain tumor imaging. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2020;81:467–87.CrossRef Park JE, Kim HS. Current applications and future perspectives of brain tumor imaging. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2020;81:467–87.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sartoretti E, Sartoretti T, Binkert C, et al. Reduction of procedure times in routine clinical practice with compressed SENSE magnetic resonance imaging technique. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0214887.CrossRef Sartoretti E, Sartoretti T, Binkert C, et al. Reduction of procedure times in routine clinical practice with compressed SENSE magnetic resonance imaging technique. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0214887.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yuh WT, Tali ET, Nguyen HD, Simonson TM, Mayr NA, Fisher DJ. The effect of contrast dose, imaging time, and lesion size in the MR detection of intracerebral metastasis. Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:373–80.PubMedPubMedCentral Yuh WT, Tali ET, Nguyen HD, Simonson TM, Mayr NA, Fisher DJ. The effect of contrast dose, imaging time, and lesion size in the MR detection of intracerebral metastasis. Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:373–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Anzalone N, Gerevini S, Scotti R, Vezzulli P, Picozzi P. Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:933–40.CrossRef Anzalone N, Gerevini S, Scotti R, Vezzulli P, Picozzi P. Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:933–40.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jeon J, Choi J, Roh H, Moon W-J. Effect of imaging time in the magnetic resonance detection of intracerebral metastases using single dose gadobutrol. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:145–50.CrossRef Jeon J, Choi J, Roh H, Moon W-J. Effect of imaging time in the magnetic resonance detection of intracerebral metastases using single dose gadobutrol. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:145–50.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Suh CH, Kim HS, Choi YJ, Kim N, Kim SJ. Prediction of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastomas using the initial and final area under the curves ratio derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:2278–86.CrossRef Suh CH, Kim HS, Choi YJ, Kim N, Kim SJ. Prediction of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastomas using the initial and final area under the curves ratio derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:2278–86.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Furutani K, Harada M, Mawlan M, Nishitani H. Difference in enhancement between spin echo and 3-dimensional fast spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in steady state magnetic resonance imaging of brain metastasis at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32:313–9.CrossRef Furutani K, Harada M, Mawlan M, Nishitani H. Difference in enhancement between spin echo and 3-dimensional fast spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in steady state magnetic resonance imaging of brain metastasis at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32:313–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, et al. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e270–8.CrossRef Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, et al. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e270–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Maravilla KR, Maldjian JA, Schmalfuss IM, et al. Contrast enhancement of central nervous system lesions: multicenter intraindividual crossover comparative study of two MR contrast agents. Radiology. 2006;240:389–400.CrossRef Maravilla KR, Maldjian JA, Schmalfuss IM, et al. Contrast enhancement of central nervous system lesions: multicenter intraindividual crossover comparative study of two MR contrast agents. Radiology. 2006;240:389–400.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jung BC, Arevalo-Perez J, Lyo JK, et al. Comparison of glioblastomas and brain metastases using dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI. J Neuroimaging. 2016;26:240–6.CrossRef Jung BC, Arevalo-Perez J, Lyo JK, et al. Comparison of glioblastomas and brain metastases using dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI. J Neuroimaging. 2016;26:240–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Engelhorn T, Schwarz MA, Eyupoglu IY, Kloska SP, Struffert T, Doerfler A. Dynamic contrast enhancement of experimental glioma: an intra-individual comparative study to assess the optimal time delay. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:188–93.CrossRef Engelhorn T, Schwarz MA, Eyupoglu IY, Kloska SP, Struffert T, Doerfler A. Dynamic contrast enhancement of experimental glioma: an intra-individual comparative study to assess the optimal time delay. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:188–93.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kuchcinski G, Le Rhun E, Cortot AB, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging pharmacokinetic parameters as predictors of treatment response of brain metastases in patients with lung cancer. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:3733–43.CrossRef Kuchcinski G, Le Rhun E, Cortot AB, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging pharmacokinetic parameters as predictors of treatment response of brain metastases in patients with lung cancer. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:3733–43.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Xi YB, Kang XW, Wang N, et al. Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from high-grade glioma and brain metastasis using arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019;112:59–64.CrossRef Xi YB, Kang XW, Wang N, et al. Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from high-grade glioma and brain metastasis using arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019;112:59–64.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Traylor JI, Bastos DCA, Fuentes D, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with brain metastases undergoing laser interstitial thermal therapy: a pilot study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1451–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Traylor JI, Bastos DCA, Fuentes D, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with brain metastases undergoing laser interstitial thermal therapy: a pilot study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1451–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Goncalves Filho ALM, Longo MGF, Conklin J, et al. MRI highly accelerated wave-CAIPI T1-SPACE versus standard T1-SPACE to detect brain gadolinium-enhancing lesions at 3T. J Neuroimaging. 2021;31:893–901.CrossRef Goncalves Filho ALM, Longo MGF, Conklin J, et al. MRI highly accelerated wave-CAIPI T1-SPACE versus standard T1-SPACE to detect brain gadolinium-enhancing lesions at 3T. J Neuroimaging. 2021;31:893–901.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Engelhardt A. Detection of acid mucopolysaccharides in human brain tumors by histochemical methods. Acta Neuropathol. 1980;49:199–203.CrossRef Engelhardt A. Detection of acid mucopolysaccharides in human brain tumors by histochemical methods. Acta Neuropathol. 1980;49:199–203.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cohen-Inbar O, Xu Z, Dodson B, et al. Time-delayed contrast-enhanced MRI improves detection of brain metastases: a prospective validation of diagnostic yield. J Neurooncol. 2016;130:485–94.CrossRef Cohen-Inbar O, Xu Z, Dodson B, et al. Time-delayed contrast-enhanced MRI improves detection of brain metastases: a prospective validation of diagnostic yield. J Neurooncol. 2016;130:485–94.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kushnirsky M, Nguyen V, Katz JS, et al. Time-delayed contrast-enhanced MRI improves detection of brain metastases and apparent treatment volumes. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:489–95.CrossRef Kushnirsky M, Nguyen V, Katz JS, et al. Time-delayed contrast-enhanced MRI improves detection of brain metastases and apparent treatment volumes. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:489–95.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Togao O, Hiwatashi A, Yamashita K, Kikuchi K, Yoshiura T, Honda H. Additional MR contrast dosage for radiologists’ diagnostic performance in detecting brain metastases: a systematic observer study at 3 T. Jpn J Radiol. 2014;32:537–44.CrossRef Togao O, Hiwatashi A, Yamashita K, Kikuchi K, Yoshiura T, Honda H. Additional MR contrast dosage for radiologists’ diagnostic performance in detecting brain metastases: a systematic observer study at 3 T. Jpn J Radiol. 2014;32:537–44.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Packer RJ, Schiff D. Neuro-oncology. Wiley; 2012. Packer RJ, Schiff D. Neuro-oncology. Wiley; 2012.
26.
go back to reference Rosenberg GA. Neurological diseases in relation to the blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1139–51.CrossRef Rosenberg GA. Neurological diseases in relation to the blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1139–51.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, et al. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:E270–8.CrossRef Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, et al. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:E270–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Park JE, Kim JY, Kim HS, Shim WH. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhancement parameters between gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine in posttreatment glioma: a prospective intraindividual study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:2041–8.CrossRef Park JE, Kim JY, Kim HS, Shim WH. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhancement parameters between gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine in posttreatment glioma: a prospective intraindividual study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:2041–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Time optimization of gadobutrol-enhanced brain MRI for metastases and primary tumors using a dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging
Authors
Jeemin Seo
Changmok Lim
Kye Young Lee
Young-Cho Koh
Won-Jin Moon
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00909-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2022 Go to the issue