Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Otology

Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours

Authors: Frank Michael Digeser, Anne Hast, Thomas Wesarg, Horst Hessel, Ulrich Hoppe

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Music perception is considered unsatisfactory for most cochlear implant (CI) users. Usually, rhythm identification is adequate while pitch and melody recognition are rather limited. The aim of this study was to investigate whether insufficient contour information in the low-frequency range is one cause that contributes to the poor melody recognition results in CI users. For this purpose, the recognition of familiar melodies was tested with three differently expanded pitch contours. Ten cochlear implant subjects and five normal-hearing (NH) volunteers were investigated. Each subject chose ten out of a possible set of 23 well-known nursery songs without verbal cues. The songs were played in the original version and with three different pitch-contour expansions. All versions were tested with and without rhythm and in random order. CI subjects exhibited best results when melodies were presented with expanded pitch contours, although no clear preference for a specific contour modification was observed. Normal-hearing subjects exhibited poorer results for expanded pitch contours, especially when testing without rhythm. Both NH and CI-user groups exhibited large inter-individual differences, and melody recognition with rhythm was always better than melody recognition without rhythm. Insufficient contour information in the low-frequency range is confirmed as one contributing cause for the poor melody recognition results in CI users. Therefore, other efforts to improve low-frequency pitch discrimination, e.g., a more sophisticated design of the electrode array, a focus of the electrical stimulation pattern or an improved signal processing scheme could potentially improve melody recognition as well.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Kang R, Nimmons GL, Drennan W, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Nie K, Won JH, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubinstein J (2009) Development and validation of the university of Washington clinical assessment of music perception test. Ear Hear 30:411–418PubMedCrossRef Kang R, Nimmons GL, Drennan W, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Nie K, Won JH, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubinstein J (2009) Development and validation of the university of Washington clinical assessment of music perception test. Ear Hear 30:411–418PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Singh S, Kong YY, Zeng FG (2009) Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicicty, and number of electrodes. Ear Hear 30:160–168PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kong YY, Zeng FG (2009) Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicicty, and number of electrodes. Ear Hear 30:160–168PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG (2004) Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 25(2):173–185PubMedCrossRef Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG (2004) Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 25(2):173–185PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference McDermott HJ, McKay CM (1997) Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 101(3):1622–1630PubMedCrossRef McDermott HJ, McKay CM (1997) Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 101(3):1622–1630PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson JF, Witt S, Stordahl J (2002) Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int 3(1):29–53PubMedCrossRef Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson JF, Witt S, Stordahl J (2002) Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int 3(1):29–53PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mirza S, Douglas SA, Lindsey P, Hildreth T, Hawthorne M (2003) Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int 4(2):85–95PubMedCrossRef Mirza S, Douglas SA, Lindsey P, Hildreth T, Hawthorne M (2003) Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int 4(2):85–95PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Pijl S (1997) Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects. Ear Hear 18:364–372PubMed Pijl S (1997) Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects. Ear Hear 18:364–372PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC (2008) Music perception by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal battery for evaluation of amusia. Ear Hear 29:618–626PubMedCrossRef Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC (2008) Music perception by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal battery for evaluation of amusia. Ear Hear 29:618–626PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fujita S, Ito J (1999) Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108:634–640PubMed Fujita S, Ito J (1999) Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108:634–640PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hiki S, Fukuda Y (2000) Pitch perception through the cochlear implant for speech and music. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 57:12–14PubMed Hiki S, Fukuda Y (2000) Pitch perception through the cochlear implant for speech and music. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 57:12–14PubMed
13.
go back to reference Loeb GE (2005) Are cochlear implant patients suffering from perceptual dissonance? Ear Hear 26:435–450PubMedCrossRef Loeb GE (2005) Are cochlear implant patients suffering from perceptual dissonance? Ear Hear 26:435–450PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Milczynski M, Wouters J, van Wieringen A (2009) Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing. J Acoust Soc Am 125:2260–2271PubMedCrossRef Milczynski M, Wouters J, van Wieringen A (2009) Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing. J Acoust Soc Am 125:2260–2271PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Laneau J, Wouters J (2004) Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 116(6):3606–3619PubMedCrossRef Laneau J, Wouters J (2004) Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 116(6):3606–3619PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kwon BJ, van den Honert C (2006) Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 120(v1):EL1–EL6PubMedCrossRef Kwon BJ, van den Honert C (2006) Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 120(v1):EL1–EL6PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L (2005) Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 118(2):623–626PubMedCrossRef Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L (2005) Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 118(2):623–626PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Baumann U, Nobbe A (2004) Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Ear Hear 25:275–283PubMedCrossRef Baumann U, Nobbe A (2004) Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Ear Hear 25:275–283PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Houtsma AJM, Smurzynski J (1990) Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 87:304–310CrossRef Houtsma AJM, Smurzynski J (1990) Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 87:304–310CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Levitin DJ (1999) Memory for musical attributes. In: Cook PR (ed) Music, cognition and computerized sound: an introduction to psychoacoustics. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 209–227 Levitin DJ (1999) Memory for musical attributes. In: Cook PR (ed) Music, cognition and computerized sound: an introduction to psychoacoustics. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 209–227
22.
go back to reference Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, Calmels MN, Verges S, Lugardon S, Andrieu S, Deguine O, Fraysse B (2003) Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 123:826–835PubMedCrossRef Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, Calmels MN, Verges S, Lugardon S, Andrieu S, Deguine O, Fraysse B (2003) Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 123:826–835PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Koelsch S, Wittfoth M, Wolf A, Müller J, Hahne A (2004) Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related study. Clin Neurophysiol 115:966–972PubMedCrossRef Koelsch S, Wittfoth M, Wolf A, Müller J, Hahne A (2004) Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related study. Clin Neurophysiol 115:966–972PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Edworthy J (1985) Interval and contour in melody processing. Music Percept 2:375–388CrossRef Edworthy J (1985) Interval and contour in melody processing. Music Percept 2:375–388CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schubert E, Stevens C (2006) The effect of implied harmony, contour and musical expertise on judgments of similarity of familiar melodies. J New Music Res 35:161–174CrossRef Schubert E, Stevens C (2006) The effect of implied harmony, contour and musical expertise on judgments of similarity of familiar melodies. J New Music Res 35:161–174CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Welker RL (1982) Abstraction of themes from melodic variations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:435–447PubMedCrossRef Welker RL (1982) Abstraction of themes from melodic variations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:435–447PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dowling WJ, Bartlett JC (1981) The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies. Psychomusicology 1:30–49CrossRef Dowling WJ, Bartlett JC (1981) The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies. Psychomusicology 1:30–49CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Trehub SE, Morrongiello BA, Thorpe LA (1985) Children’s perception of familiar melodies: the role of intervals, contour, and key. Psychomusicology 5:39–49CrossRef Trehub SE, Morrongiello BA, Thorpe LA (1985) Children’s perception of familiar melodies: the role of intervals, contour, and key. Psychomusicology 5:39–49CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Laneau J, Wouters J, Moonen M (2006) Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 11:38–52PubMedCrossRef Laneau J, Wouters J, Moonen M (2006) Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 11:38–52PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Xu L, Zhou N, Chen X, Li Y, Schultz HM, Zhao X, Han D (2009) Vocal singing by prelingually-deafned children with cochlear implants. Hear Res 255(1–2):129–134PubMedCrossRef Xu L, Zhou N, Chen X, Li Y, Schultz HM, Zhao X, Han D (2009) Vocal singing by prelingually-deafned children with cochlear implants. Hear Res 255(1–2):129–134PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Cianfrone F, Paludetti G (2011) Improving melody recognition in cochlear implants recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:27–39PubMedCrossRef di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Cianfrone F, Paludetti G (2011) Improving melody recognition in cochlear implants recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:27–39PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28:75–79CrossRef Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28:75–79CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Spahr AJ, Litvak LM, Dorman MF, Bohanan AR, Mishra LN (2008) Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef Spahr AJ, Litvak LM, Dorman MF, Bohanan AR, Mishra LN (2008) Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours
Authors
Frank Michael Digeser
Anne Hast
Thomas Wesarg
Horst Hessel
Ulrich Hoppe
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1885-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2012 Go to the issue