Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2020

01-12-2020 | Melanoma | Melanoma

Melanomas of Unknown Primary May Have a Distinct Molecular Classification to Explain Differences in Patient Outcomes

Author: Georgia M. Beasley, MD, MHSc

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Although metastatic melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is relatively uncommon, clinicians who routinely treat melanoma patients will encounter and manage patients with MUP, as approximately 3–8% of all metastatic melanoma patients will present  with MUP. Historically, the management of patients with MUP has been similar to the management of patients with metastatic melanoma and a known primary (MKP). However, biologic observations differentiating MUP and MKP have been consistently reported, including better survival for patients with MUP than for MKP patients with the same corresponding tumor stage.1,2 Furthermore, patients with MUP may have a better response to immune checkpoint therapy than patients with MKP.3
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bae JM, Choi YY, Kim DS, et al. Metastatic melanomas of unknown primary show better prognosis than those of known primary: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:59–70.CrossRef Bae JM, Choi YY, Kim DS, et al. Metastatic melanomas of unknown primary show better prognosis than those of known primary: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:59–70.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lee CC, Faries MB, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Improved survival for stage IV melanoma from an unknown primary site. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3489–95.CrossRef Lee CC, Faries MB, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Improved survival for stage IV melanoma from an unknown primary site. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3489–95.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gambichler T, Chatzipantazi M, Schröter U, Stockfleth E, Gedik C. Patients with melanoma of unknown primary show better outcome under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy than patients with known primary: preliminary results. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:e1677139.CrossRef Gambichler T, Chatzipantazi M, Schröter U, Stockfleth E, Gedik C. Patients with melanoma of unknown primary show better outcome under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy than patients with known primary: preliminary results. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:e1677139.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pires da Silva I, Wang KYX, Wilmott JS, et al. Distinct molecular profiles and immunotherapy treatment outcomes of V600E and V600K BRAF-mutant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:1272–9. Pires da Silva I, Wang KYX, Wilmott JS, et al. Distinct molecular profiles and immunotherapy treatment outcomes of V600E and V600K BRAF-mutant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:1272–9.
6.
go back to reference Horn S, Figl A, Rachakonda PS, et al. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science. 2013;339:959–61.CrossRef Horn S, Figl A, Rachakonda PS, et al. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science. 2013;339:959–61.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Melanomas of Unknown Primary May Have a Distinct Molecular Classification to Explain Differences in Patient Outcomes
Author
Georgia M. Beasley, MD, MHSc
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keywords
Melanoma
Melanoma
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09114-0

Other articles of this Issue 13/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2020 Go to the issue