Published in:
01-11-2020 | Commentary
Medical research and reproductive medicine in an ethical context: a critical commentary on the paper dealing with uterine lavage published by Munné et al.
Authors:
Maximilian Murtinger, Barbara Wirleitner, Libor Hradecký, Giorgio Comploj, Jasmin Okhowat, Dietmar Spitzer, Jürgen Stadler, Robert Haidbauer, Maximilian Schuff, Selma Yildirim, Therese Soepenberg, Kerstin Eibner, Friedrich Gagsteiger
Published in:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
|
Issue 11/2020
Login to get access
Abstract
A recent study published in Human Reproduction claimed that uterine lavage offers a non-surgical, minimally invasive strategy for the recovery of human embryos from fertile women who do not want or need IVF for medical reasons but who desire preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for embryos. To prove this hypothesis, the researchers recruited dozens of young Mexican women. The prospective oocyte donors underwent ovarian stimulation to induce the production of multiple mature oocytes. Subsequently, these women were inseminated by donor semen. A few days later, the developing embryos were collected by uterine lavage (uterine flushing) and subjected to genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Oocyte donors with persistently elevated hCG levels, indicating the implantation of one or more embryos after uterine lavage, had to undergo uterine curettage and/or treatment with methotrexate. A critical opinion paper discussing the aforementioned study was published by De Santis and colleagues and has raised critical issues that are largely technical in nature. However, this opinion paper neglects—from our point of view—critical issues of the Mexican study regarding ethical principles and moral standards in human research. These aspects are summarized below.